It is indeed a white person thing. We have had to move a lot so our kids have been to three different elementary schools with very different demographics. One was majority middle class black families. One was like 50% white, 40% black, 10% hispanic, but mostly UMC families. And one was like 75% white and all UMC families plus a small school with a kind of crunchy philosophy (not technically Waldorf but like as much like Waldorf as you find in a public school). These schools exist along a continuum where there first school's approach to gender was like 1985 -- there were likely a few kids who will one day come out as gay, but not much gender bending at all and almost no discussion of it. And names were pretty traditional boy or girl names with a handful of truly unisex names thrown in (Jordan, Alex, Morgan, etc.). Second school talked about gender a lot, lots of the girls had "boy" names or masculine nicknames, lots of the parents were very intent on pushing girls away from feminine pursuits like dance or caring about clothes and towards sports and STEM careers (though parent of boys did not encourage their boys to pursue feminine activities either, so actually this school just felt very masculine in genera and there was a lot of pressure to do sports and love math/science and my ballet-loving girl definitely felt like the odd one out). Third school, fully 20% of those kids were non-binary and we got used to getting notices from the school that a child was going by a different name and/or pronouns moving forward. My kids went with the flow at all three schools and I'm glad they had those experiences, but have to admit as an adult, the experience gave me whiplash and was extremely eye opening about how other folks are parenting. It was a good experience for me, too, but definitely a steeper learning curve for me than for my kids. |
Some people's radar but knowing two over age 20 in the US is unusual! That name first appeared in the US top 1000 girl names in 2013, and prior to that the number of girls being given that name in a given year would have been less than a hundredth of a percent -- like fewer than a 100 babies with that name in any given year most years. It's crazy it's now ranked in the top 200. It shot up fast. I think Imogen is on this trajectory in the US. It's not yet a top 1000 name but I see it mentioned on baby naming sites a lot and it's been very popular in the UK for a long time, and the US has been borrowing heavily from popular UK names the last decade or so. But still currently very rare in the US. |
| Logan |