Best elementary schools in Fairfax

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the best elementary schools in Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) with their respective key statistics and average SOL scores for each:

Sangster Elementary
Enrollment: 899
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Wolftrap Elementary
Enrollment: 550
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.7%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Haycock Elementary
Enrollment: 829
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Colvin Run Elementary
Enrollment: 766
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.1%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Churchill Road Elementary
Enrollment: 600
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 3.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Forestville Elementary
Enrollment: 580
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.1
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.7%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Navy Elementary
Enrollment: 851
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Spring Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 948
Student-Teacher Ratio: 18.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.5%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Kent Gardens Elementary
Enrollment: 1,006
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.1%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Wakefield Forest Elementary
Enrollment: 648
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Waynewood Elementary
Enrollment: 726
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.8%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Poplar Tree Elementary
Enrollment: 721
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Chesterbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 537
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.6%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Westbriar Elementary
Enrollment: 847
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Flint Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 608
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.6%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Silverbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 814
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Great Falls Elementary
Enrollment: 517
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.4%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Canterbury Woods Elementary
Enrollment: 796
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.4%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Vienna Elementary
Enrollment: 377
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.3
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.3%
Average SOL Score: 93%

Cherry Run Elementary
Enrollment: 461
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 6.1%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Stenwood Elementary
Enrollment: 539
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.9
Economically Disadvantaged: 10.9%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Hunt Valley Elementary
Enrollment: 747
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.0%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Willow Springs Elementary
Enrollment: 859
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.2%
Average SOL Score: 85%

Keene Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 801
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 19.9%
Average SOL Score: 84%

Oak Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 657
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Fox Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 645
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.3%
Average SOL Score: 89%


The best??? All you’ve done is prove that children who come from upper middle class home where parents are college educated will score well on standardized tests. Doesn’t say a word about the learning experiences of the students. The kids at these schools would score exactly the same if they were placed in a Title 1 school.


You raise an important issue about the influence of socioeconomic status on education. However, the assertion that students would perform the same in Title 1 schools as in more affluent schools overlooks key challenges. Title 1 schools, which serve higher percentages of low-income families, often face additional hurdles such as higher student-to-teacher ratios and limited resources, which can impact the focus on and quality of education. Additionally, these schools frequently address more non-academic issues related to poverty, which can detract from learning. Research shows that poverty correlates with lower academic achievement due to factors like increased stress and reduced access to learning materials. Therefore, the environment and resources of a school significantly influence student performance.


Maybe trying learning about Title 1 before writing such drivel. The point of Title 1 is to provide funding for ADDITIONAL staffing and resources. Ask any teacher in FCPS who's worked in a Title 1 school versus a non-Title 1 school. Smaller classes, more content coaches, better technology, you name it. The families of the kids who are not in poverty realize what a prize they have.


The families I have known who had kids in Title 1 schools either moved, applied for a language immersion program, or made sure that their kid was accepted into AAP and moved to the Center. None of them stayed at the Title 1 school. All of them said that the teachers were great, the Principal's were invested in the school, and that they realized that their kid was going to get very little attention in the classroom. My sample size is small, I know three families who have discussed their choices. But most people who are at a Title 1 school are there because they wanted a bigger house but didn't have the money to buy one in a more expensive part of town with better schools. Then they played the "How do I get my kid into a better school."

Our base school was a language immersion program and a good number of the kids came from schools that were Title 1 or near Title 1 schools. Entire families came to our school. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why. The kids were great and hopefully they enjoyed the program but they were not there because their family loved the language, the parents wanted their kids at a better school and were willing to drive them to school every day.

And we chose to stay at our title 1 school with language immersion and local level IV AAP.


Yale or jail

Are you trying to be funny? My kid will end up in jail because they go to school with some poor kids? Let me guess you voted for the felon?


DP. I’ve heard this saying from several people zoned for certain schools. It certainly wasn’t an original saying from that poster.

You continue to have this faux outrage over tiny perceived slights, while all the time seeking to justify the SB sabotaging Fairfax families’ school pyramid choices with boundary changes. Really bizarre.

Sabotage? There is no guarantee school boundaries won’t change. You knew that when you bought a home. Get over it.


Dumb, because when I said to the OP that she should understand that the school board is about to F with boundaries and that certain people like you like to claim what you just did, that everyone should magically know the boundary situation, then the response I heard was: why do you always bring up boundary changes?

You can’t have it both ways. If people should have full info and know that the school board is about to sabotage their school pyramid choice, then you need to be okay with me or others telling them that. Otherwise, you can’t claim that they should’ve known better. And otherwise you just sound like a conniving SB shill who is pushing the school board’s equity agenda at the expense of county families.

Oh FFS lady. A conniving shill? Do you really go through life thinking everything is a damn conspiracy? When you (general you) buy a house, it’s not a guarantee the boundaries won’t change. Most people are not happy about it but boundary changes happen and it’s impossible for everyone to be happy. How do you suggest the School Board address it? And it’s ok to talk about boundary changes but can you limit it to one thread? Why interject it in every dang thread?


DP. I agree that some people looking at elementary schools in FCPS might not know about the ongoing study or that the current School Board consists primarily of party hacks who may change school boundaries even though current enrollments are flat and even projected to decline slightly in the coming years.

If you’re going to take the position that everyone should be on notice on potential changes I don’t know why you’d complain when someone tries to do just that - put people on notice so they approach a potential home eyes wide open. It makes one think that the folks who try to shut down such comments just want to stifle any discussion.

Having said that, within any pyramid, there are areas that are less likely to be affected by potential changes and areas more “at risk.”

There is a difference between saying “hey I recommend X but FYI the SB is looking to make potential boundary changes” vs going on rants about the equity/woke SB “sabotaging” boundaries and changing the thread discussion. No one stifling discussion .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the best elementary schools in Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) with their respective key statistics and average SOL scores for each:

Sangster Elementary
Enrollment: 899
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Wolftrap Elementary
Enrollment: 550
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.7%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Haycock Elementary
Enrollment: 829
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Colvin Run Elementary
Enrollment: 766
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.1%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Churchill Road Elementary
Enrollment: 600
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 3.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Forestville Elementary
Enrollment: 580
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.1
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.7%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Navy Elementary
Enrollment: 851
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Spring Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 948
Student-Teacher Ratio: 18.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.5%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Kent Gardens Elementary
Enrollment: 1,006
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.1%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Wakefield Forest Elementary
Enrollment: 648
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Waynewood Elementary
Enrollment: 726
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.8%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Poplar Tree Elementary
Enrollment: 721
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Chesterbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 537
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.6%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Westbriar Elementary
Enrollment: 847
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Flint Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 608
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.6%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Silverbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 814
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Great Falls Elementary
Enrollment: 517
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.4%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Canterbury Woods Elementary
Enrollment: 796
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.4%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Vienna Elementary
Enrollment: 377
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.3
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.3%
Average SOL Score: 93%

Cherry Run Elementary
Enrollment: 461
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 6.1%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Stenwood Elementary
Enrollment: 539
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.9
Economically Disadvantaged: 10.9%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Hunt Valley Elementary
Enrollment: 747
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.0%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Willow Springs Elementary
Enrollment: 859
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.2%
Average SOL Score: 85%

Keene Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 801
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 19.9%
Average SOL Score: 84%

Oak Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 657
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Fox Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 645
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.3%
Average SOL Score: 89%


The best??? All you’ve done is prove that children who come from upper middle class home where parents are college educated will score well on standardized tests. Doesn’t say a word about the learning experiences of the students. The kids at these schools would score exactly the same if they were placed in a Title 1 school.


You raise an important issue about the influence of socioeconomic status on education. However, the assertion that students would perform the same in Title 1 schools as in more affluent schools overlooks key challenges. Title 1 schools, which serve higher percentages of low-income families, often face additional hurdles such as higher student-to-teacher ratios and limited resources, which can impact the focus on and quality of education. Additionally, these schools frequently address more non-academic issues related to poverty, which can detract from learning. Research shows that poverty correlates with lower academic achievement due to factors like increased stress and reduced access to learning materials. Therefore, the environment and resources of a school significantly influence student performance.


Maybe trying learning about Title 1 before writing such drivel. The point of Title 1 is to provide funding for ADDITIONAL staffing and resources. Ask any teacher in FCPS who's worked in a Title 1 school versus a non-Title 1 school. Smaller classes, more content coaches, better technology, you name it. The families of the kids who are not in poverty realize what a prize they have.


The families I have known who had kids in Title 1 schools either moved, applied for a language immersion program, or made sure that their kid was accepted into AAP and moved to the Center. None of them stayed at the Title 1 school. All of them said that the teachers were great, the Principal's were invested in the school, and that they realized that their kid was going to get very little attention in the classroom. My sample size is small, I know three families who have discussed their choices. But most people who are at a Title 1 school are there because they wanted a bigger house but didn't have the money to buy one in a more expensive part of town with better schools. Then they played the "How do I get my kid into a better school."

Our base school was a language immersion program and a good number of the kids came from schools that were Title 1 or near Title 1 schools. Entire families came to our school. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why. The kids were great and hopefully they enjoyed the program but they were not there because their family loved the language, the parents wanted their kids at a better school and were willing to drive them to school every day.

And we chose to stay at our title 1 school with language immersion and local level IV AAP.


Yale or jail

Are you trying to be funny? My kid will end up in jail because they go to school with some poor kids? Let me guess you voted for the felon?


DP. I’ve heard this saying from several people zoned for certain schools. It certainly wasn’t an original saying from that poster.

You continue to have this faux outrage over tiny perceived slights, while all the time seeking to justify the SB sabotaging Fairfax families’ school pyramid choices with boundary changes. Really bizarre.

Sabotage? There is no guarantee school boundaries won’t change. You knew that when you bought a home. Get over it.


Dumb, because when I said to the OP that she should understand that the school board is about to F with boundaries and that certain people like you like to claim what you just did, that everyone should magically know the boundary situation, then the response I heard was: why do you always bring up boundary changes?

You can’t have it both ways. If people should have full info and know that the school board is about to sabotage their school pyramid choice, then you need to be okay with me or others telling them that. Otherwise, you can’t claim that they should’ve known better. And otherwise you just sound like a conniving SB shill who is pushing the school board’s equity agenda at the expense of county families.

Oh FFS lady. A conniving shill? Do you really go through life thinking everything is a damn conspiracy? When you (general you) buy a house, it’s not a guarantee the boundaries won’t change. Most people are not happy about it but boundary changes happen and it’s impossible for everyone to be happy. How do you suggest the School Board address it? And it’s ok to talk about boundary changes but can you limit it to one thread? Why interject it in every dang thread?


I never said conspiracy, but you prove my point with your request to limit it to “one thread”. If you truly believe that families want the boundary changes you wouldn’t be concerned with posters bringing it up. (For that matter the school board wouldn’t feel the need to stack the deck with hand-picked boundary review advisory committee members to carry their water.)

We all know it is going to be immensely unpopular to sabotage families’ decisions on schools. I believe it will significantly hamper the county’s ability to attract young families to the area -especially because they plan to do this every five years. The school board members didn’t run on this platform - I checked many campaign sites during the campaign and they never campaigned on it.

All I’m doing with my post is shining a light on their deceit and agenda. OP can do what she wants, choose FCPS or not, but at least she’ll have full information rather than get the bait and switch that you and your ilk prefer.

P.S. boundary changes happen for a reason, sure. But the board has not articulated any persuasive reason for the comprehensive review. The members bicker over which category should have highest priority, and they pass around junk studies from the UAE to the BRAC to supposedly justify some of the reasons, even though the study directly refutes the rationale for moves.

And to boot last week they came out with a CIP suffering the same deficiencies in projections that have lead us to significant capacity issues costing tax payers hundreds of millions of dollars.

Anyway, OP, buy in Fairfax at your own peril.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the best elementary schools in Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) with their respective key statistics and average SOL scores for each:

Sangster Elementary
Enrollment: 899
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Wolftrap Elementary
Enrollment: 550
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.7%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Haycock Elementary
Enrollment: 829
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Colvin Run Elementary
Enrollment: 766
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.1%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Churchill Road Elementary
Enrollment: 600
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 3.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Forestville Elementary
Enrollment: 580
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.1
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.7%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Navy Elementary
Enrollment: 851
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Spring Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 948
Student-Teacher Ratio: 18.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.5%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Kent Gardens Elementary
Enrollment: 1,006
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.1%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Wakefield Forest Elementary
Enrollment: 648
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Waynewood Elementary
Enrollment: 726
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.8%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Poplar Tree Elementary
Enrollment: 721
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Chesterbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 537
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.6%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Westbriar Elementary
Enrollment: 847
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Flint Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 608
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.6%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Silverbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 814
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Great Falls Elementary
Enrollment: 517
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.4%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Canterbury Woods Elementary
Enrollment: 796
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.4%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Vienna Elementary
Enrollment: 377
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.3
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.3%
Average SOL Score: 93%

Cherry Run Elementary
Enrollment: 461
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 6.1%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Stenwood Elementary
Enrollment: 539
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.9
Economically Disadvantaged: 10.9%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Hunt Valley Elementary
Enrollment: 747
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.0%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Willow Springs Elementary
Enrollment: 859
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.2%
Average SOL Score: 85%

Keene Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 801
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 19.9%
Average SOL Score: 84%

Oak Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 657
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Fox Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 645
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.3%
Average SOL Score: 89%


The best??? All you’ve done is prove that children who come from upper middle class home where parents are college educated will score well on standardized tests. Doesn’t say a word about the learning experiences of the students. The kids at these schools would score exactly the same if they were placed in a Title 1 school.


You raise an important issue about the influence of socioeconomic status on education. However, the assertion that students would perform the same in Title 1 schools as in more affluent schools overlooks key challenges. Title 1 schools, which serve higher percentages of low-income families, often face additional hurdles such as higher student-to-teacher ratios and limited resources, which can impact the focus on and quality of education. Additionally, these schools frequently address more non-academic issues related to poverty, which can detract from learning. Research shows that poverty correlates with lower academic achievement due to factors like increased stress and reduced access to learning materials. Therefore, the environment and resources of a school significantly influence student performance.


Maybe trying learning about Title 1 before writing such drivel. The point of Title 1 is to provide funding for ADDITIONAL staffing and resources. Ask any teacher in FCPS who's worked in a Title 1 school versus a non-Title 1 school. Smaller classes, more content coaches, better technology, you name it. The families of the kids who are not in poverty realize what a prize they have.


The families I have known who had kids in Title 1 schools either moved, applied for a language immersion program, or made sure that their kid was accepted into AAP and moved to the Center. None of them stayed at the Title 1 school. All of them said that the teachers were great, the Principal's were invested in the school, and that they realized that their kid was going to get very little attention in the classroom. My sample size is small, I know three families who have discussed their choices. But most people who are at a Title 1 school are there because they wanted a bigger house but didn't have the money to buy one in a more expensive part of town with better schools. Then they played the "How do I get my kid into a better school."

Our base school was a language immersion program and a good number of the kids came from schools that were Title 1 or near Title 1 schools. Entire families came to our school. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why. The kids were great and hopefully they enjoyed the program but they were not there because their family loved the language, the parents wanted their kids at a better school and were willing to drive them to school every day.

And we chose to stay at our title 1 school with language immersion and local level IV AAP.


Yale or jail

Are you trying to be funny? My kid will end up in jail because they go to school with some poor kids? Let me guess you voted for the felon?


DP. I’ve heard this saying from several people zoned for certain schools. It certainly wasn’t an original saying from that poster.

You continue to have this faux outrage over tiny perceived slights, while all the time seeking to justify the SB sabotaging Fairfax families’ school pyramid choices with boundary changes. Really bizarre.

Sabotage? There is no guarantee school boundaries won’t change. You knew that when you bought a home. Get over it.


Dumb, because when I said to the OP that she should understand that the school board is about to F with boundaries and that certain people like you like to claim what you just did, that everyone should magically know the boundary situation, then the response I heard was: why do you always bring up boundary changes?

You can’t have it both ways. If people should have full info and know that the school board is about to sabotage their school pyramid choice, then you need to be okay with me or others telling them that. Otherwise, you can’t claim that they should’ve known better. And otherwise you just sound like a conniving SB shill who is pushing the school board’s equity agenda at the expense of county families.

Oh FFS lady. A conniving shill? Do you really go through life thinking everything is a damn conspiracy? When you (general you) buy a house, it’s not a guarantee the boundaries won’t change. Most people are not happy about it but boundary changes happen and it’s impossible for everyone to be happy. How do you suggest the School Board address it? And it’s ok to talk about boundary changes but can you limit it to one thread? Why interject it in every dang thread?


DP. I agree that some people looking at elementary schools in FCPS might not know about the ongoing study or that the current School Board consists primarily of party hacks who may change school boundaries even though current enrollments are flat and even projected to decline slightly in the coming years.

If you’re going to take the position that everyone should be on notice on potential changes I don’t know why you’d complain when someone tries to do just that - put people on notice so they approach a potential home eyes wide open. It makes one think that the folks who try to shut down such comments just want to stifle any discussion.

Having said that, within any pyramid, there are areas that are less likely to be affected by potential changes and areas more “at risk.”

There is a difference between saying “hey I recommend X but FYI the SB is looking to make potential boundary changes” vs going on rants about the equity/woke SB “sabotaging” boundaries and changing the thread discussion. No one stifling discussion .


DP. Equity is one of the four categories that they are looking at.

What term would you use to describe a situation where the school board disregards families’ choice about the school pyramid that they want for their kids. Would you prefer that we use the word subvert or undermine rather than sabotage to describe the school board’s plans? Open to suggestions for how you would properly frame the SB F’ing with its constituents’ decisions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here are the best elementary schools in Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) with their respective key statistics and average SOL scores for each:

Sangster Elementary
Enrollment: 899
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Wolftrap Elementary
Enrollment: 550
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.7%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Haycock Elementary
Enrollment: 829
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Colvin Run Elementary
Enrollment: 766
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.1%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Churchill Road Elementary
Enrollment: 600
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.7
Economically Disadvantaged: 3.0%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Forestville Elementary
Enrollment: 580
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.1
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.7%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Navy Elementary
Enrollment: 851
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Spring Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 948
Student-Teacher Ratio: 18.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.5%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Kent Gardens Elementary
Enrollment: 1,006
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 4.1%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Wakefield Forest Elementary
Enrollment: 648
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 7.9%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Waynewood Elementary
Enrollment: 726
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.8%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Poplar Tree Elementary
Enrollment: 721
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Chesterbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 537
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 2.6%
Average SOL Score: 92%

Westbriar Elementary
Enrollment: 847
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Flint Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 608
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.6%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Silverbrook Elementary
Enrollment: 814
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.8
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.2%
Average SOL Score: 89%

Great Falls Elementary
Enrollment: 517
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.6
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.4%
Average SOL Score: 91%

Canterbury Woods Elementary
Enrollment: 796
Student-Teacher Ratio: 16.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.4%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Vienna Elementary
Enrollment: 377
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.3
Economically Disadvantaged: 5.3%
Average SOL Score: 93%

Cherry Run Elementary
Enrollment: 461
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 6.1%
Average SOL Score: 90%

Stenwood Elementary
Enrollment: 539
Student-Teacher Ratio: 13.9
Economically Disadvantaged: 10.9%
Average SOL Score: 87%

Hunt Valley Elementary
Enrollment: 747
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.2
Economically Disadvantaged: 11.0%
Average SOL Score: 86%

Willow Springs Elementary
Enrollment: 859
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 14.2%
Average SOL Score: 85%

Keene Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 801
Student-Teacher Ratio: 17.4
Economically Disadvantaged: 19.9%
Average SOL Score: 84%

Oak Hill Elementary
Enrollment: 657
Student-Teacher Ratio: 14.5
Economically Disadvantaged: 8.4%
Average SOL Score: 88%

Fox Mill Elementary
Enrollment: 645
Student-Teacher Ratio: 15.0
Economically Disadvantaged: 9.3%
Average SOL Score: 89%


The best??? All you’ve done is prove that children who come from upper middle class home where parents are college educated will score well on standardized tests. Doesn’t say a word about the learning experiences of the students. The kids at these schools would score exactly the same if they were placed in a Title 1 school.


You raise an important issue about the influence of socioeconomic status on education. However, the assertion that students would perform the same in Title 1 schools as in more affluent schools overlooks key challenges. Title 1 schools, which serve higher percentages of low-income families, often face additional hurdles such as higher student-to-teacher ratios and limited resources, which can impact the focus on and quality of education. Additionally, these schools frequently address more non-academic issues related to poverty, which can detract from learning. Research shows that poverty correlates with lower academic achievement due to factors like increased stress and reduced access to learning materials. Therefore, the environment and resources of a school significantly influence student performance.


Maybe trying learning about Title 1 before writing such drivel. The point of Title 1 is to provide funding for ADDITIONAL staffing and resources. Ask any teacher in FCPS who's worked in a Title 1 school versus a non-Title 1 school. Smaller classes, more content coaches, better technology, you name it. The families of the kids who are not in poverty realize what a prize they have.


The families I have known who had kids in Title 1 schools either moved, applied for a language immersion program, or made sure that their kid was accepted into AAP and moved to the Center. None of them stayed at the Title 1 school. All of them said that the teachers were great, the Principal's were invested in the school, and that they realized that their kid was going to get very little attention in the classroom. My sample size is small, I know three families who have discussed their choices. But most people who are at a Title 1 school are there because they wanted a bigger house but didn't have the money to buy one in a more expensive part of town with better schools. Then they played the "How do I get my kid into a better school."

Our base school was a language immersion program and a good number of the kids came from schools that were Title 1 or near Title 1 schools. Entire families came to our school. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why. The kids were great and hopefully they enjoyed the program but they were not there because their family loved the language, the parents wanted their kids at a better school and were willing to drive them to school every day.

And we chose to stay at our title 1 school with language immersion and local level IV AAP.


Yale or jail

Are you trying to be funny? My kid will end up in jail because they go to school with some poor kids? Let me guess you voted for the felon?


DP. I’ve heard this saying from several people zoned for certain schools. It certainly wasn’t an original saying from that poster.

You continue to have this faux outrage over tiny perceived slights, while all the time seeking to justify the SB sabotaging Fairfax families’ school pyramid choices with boundary changes. Really bizarre.

Sabotage? There is no guarantee school boundaries won’t change. You knew that when you bought a home. Get over it.


Dumb, because when I said to the OP that she should understand that the school board is about to F with boundaries and that certain people like you like to claim what you just did, that everyone should magically know the boundary situation, then the response I heard was: why do you always bring up boundary changes?

You can’t have it both ways. If people should have full info and know that the school board is about to sabotage their school pyramid choice, then you need to be okay with me or others telling them that. Otherwise, you can’t claim that they should’ve known better. And otherwise you just sound like a conniving SB shill who is pushing the school board’s equity agenda at the expense of county families.

Oh FFS lady. A conniving shill? Do you really go through life thinking everything is a damn conspiracy? When you (general you) buy a house, it’s not a guarantee the boundaries won’t change. Most people are not happy about it but boundary changes happen and it’s impossible for everyone to be happy. How do you suggest the School Board address it? And it’s ok to talk about boundary changes but can you limit it to one thread? Why interject it in every dang thread?


It's good that any new person moving to the area understands that imminent boundary alterations can result in changes to the school.


Agreed, and I believe that anyone who says otherwise is just carrying the school board’s water, especially when they drudge out the tired line that everyone knows that they are under threat of redistricting when they buy in Fairfax. Such a ridiculous talking point.
Anonymous
Carrying the school board’s water
Subvert
Sabotaging
Stifle any discussion
These terms are just extra. Listen, I’m no fan of some the SB or FCPS policies but the language being used reminds me of the whole Open FCPS rhetoric of families/parents/kids being presented as victims of the evil, woke SB. And if anyone dares disagree, they get accused of being SB shills. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Venn Diagram of Open FCPS peeps and people harping about boundaries is a circle.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Carrying the school board’s water
Subvert
Sabotaging
Stifle any discussion
These terms are just extra. Listen, I’m no fan of some the SB or FCPS policies but the language being used reminds me of the whole Open FCPS rhetoric of families/parents/kids being presented as victims of the evil, woke SB. And if anyone dares disagree, they get accused of being SB shills. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Venn Diagram of Open FCPS peeps and people harping about boundaries is a circle.



I’ve literally never heard of open fcps. Just calling it like I see it.

For everyone saying that there is a safe distance from a school boundary that you won’t be changed, can you enlighten us what that distance is?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Carrying the school board’s water
Subvert
Sabotaging
Stifle any discussion
These terms are just extra. Listen, I’m no fan of some the SB or FCPS policies but the language being used reminds me of the whole Open FCPS rhetoric of families/parents/kids being presented as victims of the evil, woke SB. And if anyone dares disagree, they get accused of being SB shills. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Venn Diagram of Open FCPS peeps and people harping about boundaries is a circle.



People are frustrated because the School Board is largely composed of a bunch of political hacks who largely march in lock step and aren’t honest about their intentions. They or their defenders will claim a boundary study is necessary to save money but then turn around and propose to spend money on entirely unnecessary projects with no apparent sense of fiscal responsibility whatsoever.

I am sure there is some overlap between critics of the boundary study and the #OpenFCPS supporters, but it is anything but a complete overlap. In any event, the flight of families from
FCPS after schools were closed and the need for significant remediation for FCPS students (whose performance dropped more than the state average during that period) validates many of the concerns raised by that group.

Bottom line, though, is if someone is looking to buy or rent in Fairfax in 2025, and is concerned about schools, they should understand that boundaries are potentially in flux and that it is even now impossible to discern what will actually trigger a boundary change.
Anonymous
For me a good school is all about how well the admin staff communicate with families and retain staff. Does my kids feel safe there? Does the school have a diverse student population? You will find a lot of schools like this in the chantilly pyramid. Unfortunately, Chantilly will be one of those schools that will be affected by the boundary adjustment. We have a lot of good memories there. You can look at the school stats on their website to help you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For me a good school is all about how well the admin staff communicate with families and retain staff. Does my kids feel safe there? Does the school have a diverse student population? You will find a lot of schools like this in the chantilly pyramid. Unfortunately, Chantilly will be one of those schools that will be affected by the boundary adjustment. We have a lot of good memories there. You can look at the school stats on their website to help you.


Safety is the most important one for me. There is a big disparity among some FCPS schools. They used to track the incidences, but then the school board realized that those numbers don’t help in their equity efforts, so they stopped reporting the numbers- sweeping them under the rug.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For me a good school is all about how well the admin staff communicate with families and retain staff. Does my kids feel safe there? Does the school have a diverse student population? You will find a lot of schools like this in the chantilly pyramid. Unfortunately, Chantilly will be one of those schools that will be affected by the boundary adjustment. We have a lot of good memories there. You can look at the school stats on their website to help you.


Safety is the most important one for me. There is a big disparity among some FCPS schools. They used to track the incidences, but then the school board realized that those numbers don’t help in their equity efforts, so they stopped reporting the numbers- sweeping them under the rug.


Avoid Glasgow MS. Numbers don’t lie and neither do my firsthand experiences as a substitute.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:As a veteran elementary FCPS teacher and as a graduate of an FCPS high school in the 1980s, let me offer a point of view.

So much of what contributes to a good school is the principal. There is very little oversight of a principal other than test scores. Principals often do not choose to report things like bullying and violence in schools through official channels, because they will get a phone call from the central office asking them why they can’t control their school. So they underreport or let things slide.

The best way to counteract that is to contact the school board for explanations of why situations are not being handled.

In terms of instruction, elementary teachers had textbooks taken away and instructional policy is made by people at Gatehouse who haven’t been in a classroom in years and who want to cut costs. They jump on bandwagons like whole language and don’t know what they are talking about,

The way to counter that is to take excellent teachers out of the classroom for a year at a time, have them report to Gatehouse to organize and lead teacher training, and then put them back at their schools.

Behavior is out of control because so many kids need more restrictive placements for a while to get under control, but there aren’t enough placements for severely emotionally or behaviorally disabled kids in private placements because the county no longer contracts with schools that use restraint and seclusion, rather than being sure such use is closely supervised and documented. So, the pipeline has backed up.

Kids at Burke School are regularly out of control, assaulting teachers, so that many Burke teachers are suffering from concussions (THIS IS FACT) and the police are frequently called to the building. There are no seats for those kids in private placements, parents refuse to get treatment for their kids, and it’s a zoo.

As a result, kids who should be at Burke are at CSS programs, and kids in gen ed who should be in CSS are stuck trashing classrooms and assaulting peers and staff.

There are many, many students in Title I schools who can barely read in the fifth and sixth grades. That is also a fact. Again, principals are not well-supervised and I know some who have lied to central office about what academic interventions are in place.

It’s a horrifying problem. As parents, please help by contacting your school board members, who are not educators and don’t know what is going on until you tell them.

Thank you. Not only have our schools become zoos, they’ve become war zones. Classroom violence is skyrocketing because any consequence are banned by administrators. They should see how they like chairs thrown at THEM for just one day.
Anonymous
Since it’s hard to tell the potential of your child as an infant:

How did you and your husband rank on SATs? If not at the top 1 or 2 percentile, or at least 4 percentile, maybe it’s best not to have an AAP center as your base school.

What were the academic and extracurricular interests of you and your husband? Did you like math and science, or did you prefer literature and languages? If you loved learning languages, could consider an ES and MS with language immersion or a high school with IB rather than AP. Did you like sports? Theater?

Don’t pick very top schools if you and your spouse aren’t at the top compared to your own peers in this area. It’s easier to get into the same college from a lower-ranked school.

Be aware of the school boundaries and how they change as students progress. Do the students end up split from their peers as they go from ES to MS and from MS to HS?
Anonymous
Pretty simple. Avoid any school with above 25% FARMs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If I could do it all over again, I'd get a much cheaper home and save my money for private school. I don't think anything in FCPS is very good.


Pains me to say this, but long, long ago my late father scrimped, saved, researched and even visited schools to determine the best FCPS HS pyramids for his large family. Dad was proudly Jesuit-educated from elementary to masters and only briefly considered Catholic schools. He determined the area parochial schools were inferior to FCPS.

How the tide has turned. DH and I are FCPS alumni and so also educated DC in FCPS. We have seen firsthand how our schools have declined precipitously.

If we had to do all over, we’d have gone private.


+100
I could have written this. My parents also scrimped, saved, and researched in order to send my siblings and I to FCPS, which was (at the time) one of the very best school districts around. We lived in the least expensive house they could find in the best school district. The education we received really was world-class.

Our kids, also FCPS graduates, sadly did not receive the excellent education that I did. We would definitely have gone private had we only known - at least for elementary and middle. High school has actually been really good for my kids.


Weird. My kids have way more AP credits and options than I did in 1993. I am happy with it.
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: