IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

Parnas has been deposed previously and has publicly stated he is happy to testify in closed or open conditions.

I remember a time when Parnes was chastised by the left and dcum when he teamed up with Rudy during Trumps first term.

Seriously, everytime there is new evidence and we get one step closer to the truth of the Biden Crime family, the protectors move the goalpost, state an alternative facts and flip it towards shaky evidence on Republicans.

The truth is the best sunlight, regardless to what we are seeing in our banana republic.

We already have the truth about those criminals. It just keeps piling on, with more and more evidence. We have more than enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

I don't even understand the nature of the question. Zlochevsky was the head of Burisma that the corrupt prosecutor, Shokin, was refusing to investigate.

The global community, backed by the GOP senate at the time, and headed by Biden in his role as VP, to get Shokin removed BECAUSE HE WASN'T INVESTIGATING THE CORRUPTION AT BURISMA.

So what difference does it make what Zlochevsky has to say? Why would the Biden's be bribing him when he was the one who was allegedly corrupt and needed to be investigated?

Someone didnt read the 1023. In it the CHS said that Zlochevsky wanted to buy an american energy company, but knew it wouldnt get past the regulators and NYSE. The CHS claims Zlochecsky only hired Biden Inc for its influence to stop Shokin. He didnt want to pay the $10 million, but knew it was a price to deal with the US. He has receipts (text messages and emails) to back it up as described in the 1023

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

I don't even understand the nature of the question. Zlochevsky was the head of Burisma that the corrupt prosecutor, Shokin, was refusing to investigate.

The global community, backed by the GOP senate at the time, and headed by Biden in his role as VP, to get Shokin removed BECAUSE HE WASN'T INVESTIGATING THE CORRUPTION AT BURISMA.

So what difference does it make what Zlochevsky has to say? Why would the Biden's be bribing him when he was the one who was allegedly corrupt and needed to be investigated?

Someone didnt read the 1023. In it the CHS said that Zlochevsky wanted to buy an american energy company, but knew it wouldnt get past the regulators and NYSE. The CHS claims Zlochecsky only hired Biden Inc for its influence to stop Shokin. He didnt want to pay the $10 million, but knew it was a price to deal with the US. He has receipts (text messages and emails) to back it up as described in the 1023

So you are believing the criminal, particularly in light of zero money trail or other forensic evidence to back the claim. You understand a 1023 is an uncorrburated, raw data report, right? Not unlike the Steel Dossier that was also chastized because it was a collection of unverified information. Yet you get mad about one and put full faith in the other?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

I don't even understand the nature of the question. Zlochevsky was the head of Burisma that the corrupt prosecutor, Shokin, was refusing to investigate.

The global community, backed by the GOP senate at the time, and headed by Biden in his role as VP, to get Shokin removed BECAUSE HE WASN'T INVESTIGATING THE CORRUPTION AT BURISMA.

So what difference does it make what Zlochevsky has to say? Why would the Biden's be bribing him when he was the one who was allegedly corrupt and needed to be investigated?

Someone didnt read the 1023. In it the CHS said that Zlochevsky wanted to buy an american energy company, but knew it wouldnt get past the regulators and NYSE. The CHS claims Zlochecsky only hired Biden Inc for its influence to stop Shokin. He didnt want to pay the $10 million, but knew it was a price to deal with the US. He has receipts (text messages and emails) to back it up as described in the 1023

So you are believing the criminal, particularly in light of zero money trail or other forensic evidence to back the claim. You understand a 1023 is an uncorrburated, raw data report, right? Not unlike the Steel Dossier that was also chastized because it was a collection of unverified information. Yet you get mad about one and put full faith in the other?

The question is.....

Given this was from a highly credible CHS, what did the FBI do with the information?

And, he was highly credible, according to both Republicans and Democrats....

It all comes from a confidential FBI source — previously described by both Republicans and Democrats briefed on the matter as credible — who had spoken to Zlochevsky and other Burisma executives over a few occasions. The source could not give an opinion on the veracity of Zlochevsky’s statements about Hunter Biden.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4108735-republicans-release-fbi-form-alleging-unverified-biden-burisma-allegations/

[Anonymous]

The FBI, led by a Trump appointee and is mostly comprised of right wingers. It is a good question. They probably investigated the claims, found nothing and moved on.

Surely if the FBI under Wray, a republican, had found something, they would have acted on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

I don't even understand the nature of the question. Zlochevsky was the head of Burisma that the corrupt prosecutor, Shokin, was refusing to investigate.

The global community, backed by the GOP senate at the time, and headed by Biden in his role as VP, to get Shokin removed BECAUSE HE WASN'T INVESTIGATING THE CORRUPTION AT BURISMA.

So what difference does it make what Zlochevsky has to say? Why would the Biden's be bribing him when he was the one who was allegedly corrupt and needed to be investigated?

Someone didnt read the 1023. In it the CHS said that Zlochevsky wanted to buy an american energy company, but knew it wouldnt get past the regulators and NYSE. The CHS claims Zlochecsky only hired Biden Inc for its influence to stop Shokin. He didnt want to pay the $10 million, but knew it was a price to deal with the US. He has receipts (text messages and emails) to back it up as described in the 1023

So you are believing the criminal, particularly in light of zero money trail or other forensic evidence to back the claim. You understand a 1023 is an uncorrburated, raw data report, right? Not unlike the Steel Dossier that was also chastized because it was a collection of unverified information. Yet you get mad about one and put full faith in the other?

The question is.....

Given this was from a highly credible CHS, what did the FBI do with the information?

And, he was highly credible, according to both Republicans and Democrats....

It all comes from a confidential FBI source — previously described by both Republicans and Democrats briefed on the matter as credible — who had spoken to Zlochevsky and other Burisma executives over a few occasions. The source could not give an opinion on the veracity of Zlochevsky’s statements about Hunter Biden.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4108735-republicans-release-fbi-form-alleging-unverified-biden-burisma-allegations/

Question, if there were actual evidence, don't you think the House GOP would have made it public by now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the FD-1023 the head of Burisma was forced to pay the $10 million. He didnt want to as well

According to sworn testimony, there was never a 10 million dollar bribe. Are you going to spam every thread with this nonsense?

By who and cite source?

The former head of Burisma as well as others around him, as well as Lev Parnas as a PP has noted.

Seriously you are being duped. It is a bad look. I hope you aren't spouting this nonsense to humans in real life.

Was Zlochevsky deposed by the DoJ? Where's the transcript? Can't wait for Lev Parnes to testify under oath as well.

Seriously youre being duped. The whistleblower is a known paid CHS. The FBI and DoJ are corrupt, have a bad track record ever since they were caught in 2017 for influencing the 2016 election.

I don't even understand the nature of the question. Zlochevsky was the head of Burisma that the corrupt prosecutor, Shokin, was refusing to investigate.

The global community, backed by the GOP senate at the time, and headed by Biden in his role as VP, to get Shokin removed BECAUSE HE WASN'T INVESTIGATING THE CORRUPTION AT BURISMA.

So what difference does it make what Zlochevsky has to say? Why would the Biden's be bribing him when he was the one who was allegedly corrupt and needed to be investigated?

Someone didnt read the 1023. In it the CHS said that Zlochevsky wanted to buy an american energy company, but knew it wouldnt get past the regulators and NYSE. The CHS claims Zlochecsky only hired Biden Inc for its influence to stop Shokin. He didnt want to pay the $10 million, but knew it was a price to deal with the US. He has receipts (text messages and emails) to back it up as described in the 1023

So you are believing the criminal, particularly in light of zero money trail or other forensic evidence to back the claim. You understand a 1023 is an uncorrburated, raw data report, right? Not unlike the Steel Dossier that was also chastized because it was a collection of unverified information. Yet you get mad about one and put full faith in the other?

The question is.....

Given this was from a highly credible CHS, what did the FBI do with the information?

And, he was highly credible, according to both Republicans and Democrats....

It all comes from a confidential FBI source — previously described by both Republicans and Democrats briefed on the matter as credible — who had spoken to Zlochevsky and other Burisma executives over a few occasions. The source could not give an opinion on the veracity of Zlochevsky’s statements about Hunter Biden.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4108735-republicans-release-fbi-form-alleging-unverified-biden-burisma-allegations/

Question, if there were actual evidence, don't you think the House GOP would have made it public by now?

There obviously is no evidence. This is a transparent effort to try to create equivalency between Biden and Trump, and they are ramping up now because Trump is about to be indicted for a third time. No one is buying it except the idiot Trumpers.

[Anonymous]

From the FD-1023...

Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky told an FBI informant, a US businessman, that Hunter Biden "was stupid and his dog was smarter," but that he needed to keep him on the Burisma board "to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From the FD-1023...

Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky told an FBI informant, a US businessman, that Hunter Biden "was stupid and his dog was smarter," but that he needed to keep him on the Burisma board "to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems"

Well, then I guess they didn't get their money's worth, LOL.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the FD-1023...

Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky told an FBI informant, a US businessman, that Hunter Biden "was stupid and his dog was smarter," but that he needed to keep him on the Burisma board "to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems"

Well, then I guess they didn't get their money's worth, LOL.

Too many to pay within Biden Inc...

Hunter Biden's daughter Naomi (as an adult) met overseas with Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky's daughter Karina. The two attended Burisma board meetings with their fathers. Naomi Biden now works at Arnold & Porter LLP. IRS agents testified they were prevented from interviewing her in tax fraud case.

Nothing to see here... indict Trump!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the FD-1023...

Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky told an FBI informant, a US businessman, that Hunter Biden "was stupid and his dog was smarter," but that he needed to keep him on the Burisma board "to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems"

Well, then I guess they didn't get their money's worth, LOL.

Too many to pay within Biden Inc...

Hunter Biden's daughter Naomi (as an adult) met overseas with Burisma oligarch Zlochevsky's daughter Karina. The two attended Burisma board meetings with their fathers. Naomi Biden now works at Arnold & Porter LLP. IRS agents testified they were prevented from interviewing her in tax fraud case.

Nothing to see here... indict Trump!

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile in the msm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile in the msm

Why won’t they report my fake story? Waaaaah!!!’