Russia fires missiles into Poland
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Zelensky and his Azog Battalion are not on my team. Also - lol at all the posters who spent the entire Trump Administration calling the Jew Steven Miller a “nazi” and “fascist” suddenly claiming that Zelensky’s Jewishness means he can’t be a nazi when he’s literally leading a self-described nazi battalion lol |
Anonymous
We didn't vote for Putin. That's your guy whose in bed with Putin. And also, you are a horrible human. |
Anonymous
^PP would be fine with Putin pulling the strings in the US via Trump. That is clear. |
Anonymous
I recall Miller being called a huge hypocrite. I never called him a Nazi. However, it still doesn't change the fact that Putin's excuse for invading Ukraine of getting rid of the neoNazis is BS. Russia has neoNazis. Why doesn't he get rid of them at home? I bet there are some neoNazi Russian soldiers. |
Anonymous
PP you just replied to. Actually I've posted numerous times that nations will try to minimize this because whatever it is, it's pretty sure to be an accident. At most, it will trigger article 4. You need to learn to respond to excitable people without exaggerating your own posts. Stop being a pro-Russian troll whining about neoNazis. Nothing excuses Russian invasion, so discussing white supremacy is off-topic on thread pertaining to the war in Ukraine. Go start your own thread about neoNazis and I'll contribute about the skinheads in my country, France. Focus on what's likely: it's a Russian missile accidentally sent across the border, or it's a Ukrainian interception of a Russian missile accidentally sent across the border. Neither of which should trigger any sort of militarized NATO response. Eastern Europe will continue to prepare militarily as a show of strength, but Putin has no intention of invading them. All this is for show. What matters is the question: will Russia run out of missiles before Ukraine's infrastructure collapses completely, or the reverse? That will determine the course of the war, and timing of possible acts of desperation, such as nuclear plant sabotage, tactical weapon, dam explosions, chemical weapon, etc. |
Anonymous
All they have is an equally cantankerous one-eyed cat. |
Anonymous
|
DP. Ask yourself, if this had happened to Germany or the U.S., what would the NATO reaction be? The same standard should be applied to Poland. Russia should not benefit in any way from this action. If there is no response, no retaliation; mark my words, the Russian government will perceive this as weakness. It's a prison mentality - might makes right. For all intents and purposes, the Russian civilization has already fallen.
"The ISIS-style video shows a man with his head tied to a block of cement. " "Behind him, a man in camouflage clothing smashes a sledgehammer into Nuzhin’s neck and head, causing Nuzhin to collapse to the floor. The executioner then slams another blow onto his head." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/14/family-expresses-horror-at-video-of-killing-of-russian-wagner-group-defector These are not acts of a modern nation. These are the acts of monsters in human skin. There is no reform, no forgiveness, no sympathy deserved. There is no reason to argue with the pro-Russian posters on this thread. It's not worth the waste of breath. The pro-Russians on this thread are just as culpable, just as the Nazi party was culpable for carrying out Hitler's orders. |
Anonymous
It’s not an act of a nation so let’s not pretend like it is. There a no proof it was performed by the state. But this sudden onset of fastidiousness is rather charming when it comes from a nation that for decades supported AlSaud, who DID cut limbs off people in public. Were you posting lamentations then too? |
Anonymous
You are ungrateful. |
Anonymous
The manufactured appeals to “shock” and “horror” at violent acts taking place in a war zone are rich, coming from a country that burned and nuked millions of civilian men, women, and children in Japan during WW2; to say nothing of the atrocities that the U.S. had committed in the many military conflicts it has gotten itself involved in since then. Nobody is buying it. What is of paramount importance is keeping America out of this war in Ukraine and avoiding war with a major nuclear power like Russia. |
Anonymous
I’m of the view that Putin, who surrounds himself with a bunch of lackeys, believed he could irreparably fracture a weakened NATO alliance with a swift defeat of Ukraine and installing a puppet regime. He soon found out that he had overplayed his hand when his forces could not establish air superiority and the army lacked the logistic infrastructure to move fuel and other supplies to the front lines across a broad expanse with limited roads. Part of his strategic was that Poland would need to reassess its alignment once NATO was more or less neutralized as would the Baltics, with Finland officially remaining non-allied. Now he has been exposed — and doubled down on the annexed areas of Ukraine with a referendum — with an army comprised in part of mobilized civilians armed with rusty rifles and backed up with mothballed 60 year old T62 tanks. The fight is an existential one for Ukraine, and to a lesser degree, NATO insofar as it destabilizes democracy in Europe (if not globally as the result of interrupted grain shipments). Putin won’t intentionally sabotage any nuclear facilities or resort to tactical nuclear or chemical weapons, but it can’t be ruled out in the case of an ascendant player like Prighozhin. Putin is rational snd strategic, albeit not in the sense to which we are accustomed in the West. He capitalizes in weakness and indecisiveness. He learned all-too-quickly that Biden was neither weak nor indecisive. Biden is no Trump. And Boris was already standing on shaky ground. He was able to assess Macron and Scholz pretty accurately. He’s now trapped, having lost the Kerch Strait Bridge, and desperately hoping to defend critical rail supply lines to Crimea before the full onset of winter. Perhaps he envisions another siege of Stalingrad from which he magically arises victorious? That necessarily has to be his focus, including preserving as much of his military equipment and conscripted professional warfighters such as Spetsnaz and Marines. In the meantime, he needs to solve the problem of mobilizing industry and obtaining critical components for modern weapons and combinations systems from the likes of India and China. |
Anonymous
I’d be grateful if they’d spent less time posting and more with their unfortunate feline. |
Anonymous
Yeah, that's all cool until your kids get drafted to fight WWIII in a distant land you really know nothing about |
Anonymous
Just because you keep posting the same nonsense over and over doesn’t make it any more logical or compelling. |