Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

It has been initially reported that he suffered from a psychosomatic illness. I think the reporting became more accurate as the details unfolded...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It has been initially reported that he suffered from a psychosomatic illness. I think the reporting became more accurate as the details unfolded...

shocking... The medical insight has now killed this thread. Kane may actually be manic OCD. Who knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So I feel like something is up with Kane. I mean he seems so genuine and kind and just a good person on air but it's really weird that 3 people left his show disgruntled.

Oh, FFS, they all thought that they could go somewhere else and make it big on their own. Guess what, they didn't, they are back in DC doing radio.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What German wings crash?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32604552

[Anonymous]

go kane! MY MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I feel like something is up with Kane. I mean he seems so genuine and kind and just a good person on air but it's really weird that 3 people left his show disgruntled.

Oh, FFS, they all thought that they could go somewhere else and make it big on their own. Guess what, they didn't, they are back in DC doing radio.

Yup... That doesn't change the fact that they probably left because of issues with Kane (if rumors are to be believed, which apparently holds true on DCUM).. .and guess what, they aren't working with Kane even though they are back in DC, and given the opportunity I doubt they would want to...at least from what they have hinted...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I feel like something is up with Kane. I mean he seems so genuine and kind and just a good person on air but it's really weird that 3 people left his show disgruntled.

I like Kane. Or at least I suppose I like the guy he pretends to be.

I feel it is important to remember that those 3 people left before Kane was diagnosed with his ADHD and OCD. I'm not saying they are a complete excuse and it could have been for totally different reasons. But perhaps some of the traits of those illnesses came through and without an explanation people thought he was just an asshole or intentionally rude/disrespectful. Again, I could be totally wrong. Maybe it has nothing to do with it. But I would be curious to see if someone who used to work with Kane came back and worked with him again and still had the same issues?

Lol they won't be coming back to work with Kane anytime soon...I.e never...you can't even diagnose ADHD in adults so I'm sure at least that much was already known and he just decided to publicize it now along with the OCD diagnosis.

You absolutely CAN diagnose ADHD in adults. It likely is something that an adult has had since childhood that went undiagnosed, but it can be diagnosed in adulthood.

That's strange... When we were studying for our board exams we were told it has to be diagnosed before a certain age otherwise it can't be medicated...maybe that has changed since ?

Did you take your boards in 1982? It can be medicated at any age, not just in childhood. Also, they've long realized that some people with ADHD (especially with inattentive type, which wasn't recognized in the early days of ADHD diagnosis; only hyperactivity was) are often able to compensate at earlier ages, and that it may not be until adulthood that symptoms become too difficult to manage and the person starts to seek help. This is especially true with women (who are more prone to inattentive; men are more prone to hyperactive), where as children they are regarded as daydreamers and perhaps a bit scattered, but aren't having behavioral problems. They naturally develop compensatory strategies that get through school, but as life becomes more complex (they begin a career, get married, have kids), their compensatory strategies are no longer enough to manage the increasing complexity of their lives and things start to fall apart.

[Anonymous]

If we all remember, Sarah left the show because she was trying to get her own talk show called "hey Frase". So she left, she never got the talk show and would tweet about how she's jobless and gonna be broke soon. I believe she tweeted at someone who said something about finding $1 hot
Dogs from a street vendor and she said "dollar hot dogs? I'll need that since I have no job". So no, she didn't make it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If we all remember, Sarah left the show because she was trying to get her own talk show called "hey Frase". So she left, she never got the talk show and would tweet about how she's jobless and gonna be broke soon. I believe she tweeted at someone who said something about finding $1 hot
Dogs from a street vendor and she said "dollar hot dogs? I'll need that since I have no job". So no, she didn't make it.

Nobody here said she made it... Who are you replying to lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I feel like something is up with Kane. I mean he seems so genuine and kind and just a good person on air but it's really weird that 3 people left his show disgruntled.

I like Kane. Or at least I suppose I like the guy he pretends to be.

I feel it is important to remember that those 3 people left before Kane was diagnosed with his ADHD and OCD. I'm not saying they are a complete excuse and it could have been for totally different reasons. But perhaps some of the traits of those illnesses came through and without an explanation people thought he was just an asshole or intentionally rude/disrespectful. Again, I could be totally wrong. Maybe it has nothing to do with it. But I would be curious to see if someone who used to work with Kane came back and worked with him again and still had the same issues?

Lol they won't be coming back to work with Kane anytime soon...I.e never...you can't even diagnose ADHD in adults so I'm sure at least that much was already known and he just decided to publicize it now along with the OCD diagnosis.

You absolutely CAN diagnose ADHD in adults. It likely is something that an adult has had since childhood that went undiagnosed, but it can be diagnosed in adulthood.

That's strange... When we were studying for our board exams we were told it has to be diagnosed before a certain age otherwise it can't be medicated...maybe that has changed since ?

Did you take your boards in 1982? It can be medicated at any age, not just in childhood. Also, they've long realized that some people with ADHD (especially with inattentive type, which wasn't recognized in the early days of ADHD diagnosis; only hyperactivity was) are often able to compensate at earlier ages, and that it may not be until adulthood that symptoms become too difficult to manage and the person starts to seek help. This is especially true with women (who are more prone to inattentive; men are more prone to hyperactive), where as children they are regarded as daydreamers and perhaps a bit scattered, but aren't having behavioral problems. They naturally develop compensatory strategies that get through school, but as life becomes more complex (they begin a career, get married, have kids), their compensatory strategies are no longer enough to manage the increasing complexity of their lives and things start to fall apart.

Sorry I meant that we were told that after a certain age they won't diagnose ADHD due to overlapping symptoms with many other mental disorders, and because of that that it isn't medicated, not that they are not responsive to it. Or is that also how you read my post? Either way I stand corrected, thank goodness there were no questions on it!

[Anonymous]

did anyone catch nat's instagram post earlier? the corner of her computer screen with her dog lying in the corner

i feel like she's trying to bait us with this blog post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I feel like something is up with Kane. I mean he seems so genuine and kind and just a good person on air but it's really weird that 3 people left his show disgruntled.

I like Kane. Or at least I suppose I like the guy he pretends to be.

I feel it is important to remember that those 3 people left before Kane was diagnosed with his ADHD and OCD. I'm not saying they are a complete excuse and it could have been for totally different reasons. But perhaps some of the traits of those illnesses came through and without an explanation people thought he was just an asshole or intentionally rude/disrespectful. Again, I could be totally wrong. Maybe it has nothing to do with it. But I would be curious to see if someone who used to work with Kane came back and worked with him again and still had the same issues?

Lol they won't be coming back to work with Kane anytime soon...I.e never...you can't even diagnose ADHD in adults so I'm sure at least that much was already known and he just decided to publicize it now along with the OCD diagnosis.

You absolutely CAN diagnose ADHD in adults. It likely is something that an adult has had since childhood that went undiagnosed, but it can be diagnosed in adulthood.

That's strange... When we were studying for our board exams we were told it has to be diagnosed before a certain age otherwise it can't be medicated...maybe that has changed since ?

Did you take your boards in 1982? It can be medicated at any age, not just in childhood. Also, they've long realized that some people with ADHD (especially with inattentive type, which wasn't recognized in the early days of ADHD diagnosis; only hyperactivity was) are often able to compensate at earlier ages, and that it may not be until adulthood that symptoms become too difficult to manage and the person starts to seek help. This is especially true with women (who are more prone to inattentive; men are more prone to hyperactive), where as children they are regarded as daydreamers and perhaps a bit scattered, but aren't having behavioral problems. They naturally develop compensatory strategies that get through school, but as life becomes more complex (they begin a career, get married, have kids), their compensatory strategies are no longer enough to manage the increasing complexity of their lives and things start to fall apart.

Sorry I meant that we were told that after a certain age they won't diagnose ADHD due to overlapping symptoms with many other mental disorders, and because of that that it isn't medicated, not that they are not responsive to it. Or is that also how you read my post? Either way I stand corrected, thank goodness there were no questions on it!

Depending on when you took your boards, it's entirely possible you were taught that based on what was known at the time. There was definitely a time where it was believed that if you didn't exhibit classic symptoms by a certain age (generally elementary age), it wasn't ADHD. That was back when ADHD was really understood to just be hyperactive boys (and the rare girl) who couldn't sit still and failed all their classes. As our understanding of ADHD and the different types evolved, doctors came to realize that this wasn't true, that there wasn't just one profile of a person with ADHD, and that some people were better at compensating (and thus hiding their symptoms) better than others. These changes in understanding have been filtering down, but even as recently as the last five years I've head GPs say that if a kid didn't fail classes in school or there weren't clear symptoms by the age of 7, it can't be ADHD. Fortunately as our understanding has evolved, experts in this area have become much better at identifying it in adults, and many of those adults respond incredibly well to medication.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:did anyone catch nat's instagram post earlier? the corner of her computer screen with her dog lying in the corner

i feel like she's trying to bait us with this blog post.

You need help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Depending on when you took your boards, it's entirely possible you were taught that based on what was known at the time. There was definitely a time where it was believed that if you didn't exhibit classic symptoms by a certain age (generally elementary age), it wasn't ADHD. That was back when ADHD was really understood to just be hyperactive boys (and the rare girl) who couldn't sit still and failed all their classes. As our understanding of ADHD and the different types evolved, doctors came to realize that this wasn't true, that there wasn't just one profile of a person with ADHD, and that some people were better at compensating (and thus hiding their symptoms) better than others. These changes in understanding have been filtering down, but even as recently as the last five years I've head GPs say that if a kid didn't fail classes in school or there weren't clear symptoms by the age of 7, it can't be ADHD. Fortunately as our understanding has evolved, experts in this area have become much better at identifying it in adults, and many of those adults respond incredibly well to medication.

Thx for taking the time to reply! Very informative, it's nice to see some quality posts on here

[Anonymous]

Stay on topic!