Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers

I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.

I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).

I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.

Suspect it's just more of the crap that happened with the J6 hearings when something was claimed to be "anonymous whistleblower" or "Secret Service denies it" that's trashtalking but when it comes time to step up and lay their hands on a bible, swear to tell the truth under penalty of perjury and repeat claims being made they suddenly become shy and are nowhere to be found.

Without sworn testimony broadcast on C-SPAN I don't believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still throwing ketchup-covered spaghetti at the wall to see what'll stick, are you Rs.

What's going to stick are the charges of treason.

Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Let's protect the whistleblowers and listen to what they have to say.

Yep, dem here, I welcome their sworn testimony. Bring it on!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers

I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.

I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).

I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.

Suspect it's just more of the crap that happened with the J6 hearings when something was claimed to be "anonymous whistleblower" or "Secret Service denies it" that's trashtalking but when it comes time to step up and lay their hands on a bible, swear to tell the truth under penalty of perjury and repeat claims being made they suddenly become shy and are nowhere to be found.

Without sworn testimony broadcast on C-SPAN I don't believe it.

Certainly. Privately it's "You want to get there? Calling your bluff, Punk", and publicly it's "Whistleblowers should be afforded every protection under the law; we welcome their testimony."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

Yeeeeahhh, we've seen that playbook before.

Testify under oath, m----f---ers. Then we will listen to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

I watched the entire 6 minute clip that contained Jim Jordan’s claim that 14 FBI agents have approached his office as whistleblowers. It’s not 14 since the MAL raid. He says it’s becoming a well worn path over things like parents being treated as terrorists for the way they behaved at school board meetings and all kinds of things. The vast majority of the complaining in that clip is about Jim Comey.

Ahhh, so it's more attempts at obfuscation. If there are actual complaints about this matter, hear them out. Do it all by the books. Trump and the GOP aren't going to be able to whine it all away this time.

[Anonymous]

Being a disgruntled MAGA fascist in the FBI does not make you a whistleblower. A whistleblower is someone with insider evidence of illegal actions who files the documented evidence under seal to a federal court or OIG so that the whistleblower’s identity is protected and the allegation is not made public before it is reviewed and verified.

Anyone who takes their complaint to Jim Jordan is not a legit whistleblower. A whistleblower needs a lawyer not a clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers

I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.

I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).

I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.

Suspect it's just more of the crap that happened with the J6 hearings when something was claimed to be "anonymous whistleblower" or "Secret Service denies it" that's trashtalking but when it comes time to step up and lay their hands on a bible, swear to tell the truth under penalty of perjury and repeat claims being made they suddenly become shy and are nowhere to be found.

Without sworn testimony broadcast on C-SPAN I don't believe it.

Certainly. Privately it's "You want to get there? Calling your bluff, Punk", and publicly it's "Whistleblowers should be afforded every protection under the law; we welcome their testimony."

Sure, absolutely! Bring it on.

[Anonymous]

Have the Repubs gotten their stories straight about the raid yet?

[Anonymous]

If you were a whistleblower who wanted to go on the record (for investigators, not necessarily publicly), would you go to Jim Jordan? I’m not a fed, so I don’t know the procedure, but aren’t there IGs for this type of thing? Isn’t Jordan just calling people “whistle blowers” for complaining to him that they disagree with their bosses and want Congress to turn up the heat? Has Jordan launched an investigation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Tucker Carlson is just so amused by President Trump’s having these kinds of conversations with Kid Rock. Wonder how he would have felt about President Obama having the same interactions with Oprah?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have the Repubs gotten their stories straight about the raid yet?

No, the mother ship is under attack from multiple fronts, so they haven't been able to beam out instructions to the collective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the Repubs gotten their stories straight about the raid yet?

No, the mother ship is under attack from multiple fronts, so they haven't been able to beam out instructions to the collective.