Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I need proof.

So you never believe any woman or girl who says she was molested or harassed because you need proof other than her word, which would be what in your view?

I feel sorry for any daughter or sister you have. Can just hear you telling them "sorry I need proof" if they came to you with a claim of sexual assault.

NP. I would encourage my daughter to go to the police right away. End of. The burden of proof usually sits with the victim.

When the accused is the District Attorney in a small town I'm sure that goes real well.

At least I would know that we did the right thing. The rest is on them.

[Anonymous]

The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"Only two accusers."


How many in your opinion would be enough?

The WAPO article counts four accusers--but, only one was assaulted according to the story. The others were over the age of consent (legally). The accuser today has also accused him of assault.

What PP meant was that it was not the number of accusers that people are talking about.

And, FWIW, the accusers should be believed--until proven otherwise. Right now, these are brand new accusations. If true, Moore IS a pedophile.

I just find it hard to believe that this was kept secret for so long. These women were not looking to get a job like those with Harvey Weinstein. Moore was not in a position of power over them for the last forty years. (He definitely was in a position of power when they were teens.) In small town Alabama, I just find it hard to believe that it did not go out the boundaries of Gadsden.

The other three women in the WAPO article are much more credible. But, they are not accusing him of assault.

Why do you assert that it did not? How do you suppose the reporter got wind of the story in the first place? Because people were talking about Moore's taste for young girls.

I believe that he liked younger legal girls, like a lot of men. But the Post could not convict him on that, so made one of them two years younger. And then when the people of Alabama questioned her story, they trotted out some has-been lawyer who Wikileaks has already exposed with another underage 'victim'. Forgive me for my cynicism.

You're not forgiven.

You fully believed in Pizzagate, didn't you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

Only if false. Unfortunately, the evidence is in that’s its true. Maybe Roy Moore would want to litigate the truthfulness of this claim? That would be a great idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

You'd have to first prove that it's libelous. Which you can't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

Only if false. Unfortunately, the evidence is in that’s its true. Maybe Roy Moore would want to litigate the truthfulness of this claim? That would be a great idea.

So you can prove he was/is a pedophile? Think before you answer because based on all information as presented you can't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why do you assert that it did not? How do you suppose the reporter got wind of the story in the first place? Because people were talking about Moore's taste for young girls.

No one is denying he dated teens. One of them worked on HRC's campaign. My guess is that she planted the seed to WAPO.

Gross. This should be disqualifying for a man who wants to be a senator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

Only if false. Unfortunately, the evidence is in that’s its true. Maybe Roy Moore would want to litigate the truthfulness of this claim? That would be a great idea.

So you can prove he was/is a pedophile? Think before you answer because based on all information as presented you can't.

That’s not the legal standard, but good try. Moore can sue all he wants. He won’t.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

I welcome conducting discovery as part of a libel suit.

[Anonymous]

Well I declare, look at that smartly dressed prosecutor I a pair of polyester slacks and neatly pressed dressed shirt walking through the local shopping mall in the early 80s (allegedly).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"Only two accusers."


How many in your opinion would be enough?

The WAPO article counts four accusers--but, only one was assaulted according to the story. The others were over the age of consent (legally). The accuser today has also accused him of assault.

What PP meant was that it was not the number of accusers that people are talking about.

And, FWIW, the accusers should be believed--until proven otherwise. Right now, these are brand new accusations. If true, Moore IS a pedophile.

I just find it hard to believe that this was kept secret for so long. These women were not looking to get a job like those with Harvey Weinstein. Moore was not in a position of power over them for the last forty years. (He definitely was in a position of power when they were teens.) In small town Alabama, I just find it hard to believe that it did not go out the boundaries of Gadsden.

The other three women in the WAPO article are much more credible. But, they are not accusing him of assault.

Why do you assert that it did not? How do you suppose the reporter got wind of the story in the first place? Because people were talking about Moore's taste for young girls.

I believe that he liked younger legal girls, like a lot of men. But the Post could not convict him on that, so made one of them two years younger. And then when the people of Alabama questioned her story, they trotted out some has-been lawyer who Wikileaks has already exposed with another underage 'victim'. Forgive me for my cynicism.

i agree. whenever gloria allred is involved it is politics. especially when her daughter defended weinstein. They are both lawyers, paid to lie.

[Anonymous]

Ol’ Strom would have been like, whoa dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is libelous.

Moderator. Moderator.

Report. Report.

Only if false. Unfortunately, the evidence is in that’s its true. Maybe Roy Moore would want to litigate the truthfulness of this claim? That would be a great idea.

So you can prove he was/is a pedophile? Think before you answer because based on all information as presented you can't.

NP. We know Moore has a terrible record on sexual abuse, including being the only dissenting voice on the rape of a 4 year old child. At the very least, he's a pedophile enabler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I need proof.

So you never believe any woman or girl who says she was molested or harassed because you need proof other than her word, which would be what in your view?

I feel sorry for any daughter or sister you have. Can just hear you telling them "sorry I need proof" if they came to you with a claim of sexual assault.

NP. I would encourage my daughter to go to the police right away. End of. The burden of proof usually sits with the victim.

When the accused is the District Attorney in a small town I'm sure that goes real well.

At least I would know that we did the right thing. The rest is on them.

And what if your daughter said no, she was too frightened and she didn't want to do it? Would you wash your hands, say well, sorry I can't believe you, and then donate money to her assailant when he ran for office?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I need proof.

So you never believe any woman or girl who says she was molested or harassed because you need proof other than her word, which would be what in your view?

I feel sorry for any daughter or sister you have. Can just hear you telling them "sorry I need proof" if they came to you with a claim of sexual assault.

NP. I would encourage my daughter to go to the police right away. End of. The burden of proof usually sits with the victim.

When the accused is the District Attorney in a small town I'm sure that goes real well.

At least I would know that we did the right thing. The rest is on them.

Until you are raped, or groped, by someone powerful you do not know what you would do. Buy, hey, see if you can get a job on Roy Moore's office and let us know. You are beyond stupid.