Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A GOP strategist on CNN was saying that Garland needs to indict Trump or resign, because the extraordinary step of searching a former President's home was too great not to have good reason to indict.

I could see his point, and I do believe Garland made the same calculation, but isn't the entire point of a warrant when you have reason enough to search, but are looking for the evidence to indict? So if the evidence isn't there, well you can't go on to that step, can you?

But the point was brought home that Garland is definitely risking a LOT. He can't do otherwise. It's a tough spot to be in.

What does the GOP strategist think about the FBI Director announcing a few weeks before a Presidential election that one nominee is under investigation and the eventually admitting there was nothing there; and meanwhile the other nominee also was being investigated but the FBI Director did not reveal that? That seems much worse than okaying the execution of a grand jury search warrant supported by evidence that a disgruntled former government employee with a documented history as a petulant security threat has taken Top Secret government files.

Scott Jennings is McConnell’s amoral errand boy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A GOP strategist on CNN was saying that Garland needs to indict Trump or resign, because the extraordinary step of searching a former President's home was too great not to have good reason to indict.

I could see his point, and I do believe Garland made the same calculation, but isn't the entire point of a warrant when you have reason enough to search, but are looking for the evidence to indict? So if the evidence isn't there, well you can't go on to that step, can you?

But the point was brought home that Garland is definitely risking a LOT. He can't do otherwise. It's a tough spot to be in.

What does the GOP strategist think about the FBI Director announcing a few weeks before a Presidential election that one nominee is under investigation and the eventually admitting there was nothing there; and meanwhile the other nominee also was being investigated but the FBI Director did not reveal that? That seems much worse than okaying the execution of a grand jury search warrant supported by evidence that a disgruntled former government employee with a documented history as a petulant security threat has taken Top Secret government files.

That GOP strategist probably just smiles smugly at that.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Putin cultivating Trump as an asset might still be paying off for Russia.

Makes you wonder about all the recent Russian murder-suicides . .

Holy cow. There was a crazy series of Russian deaths for a while. Was that during Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The feds have told Trump’s attorneys that they have found documents covered by attorney client privilege. What happens with those materials now?

How would the FBI plant attorney client privileged material?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a tough spot. Iff a citizen is illegally storing nuclear secrets at their house, you take steps to secure them regardless of what the person’s last job might have been.

This. They had to get the warrant, and they had to retrieve the material. Part of me wonders if they’ll ever have strong enough case to press charges—He will deny and lie and if they can’t prove he knew the documents were in his possession, it will be difficult to charge him—but they secured the material and that’s what matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a tough spot. Iff a citizen is illegally storing nuclear secrets at their house, you take steps to secure them regardless of what the person’s last job might have been.

This. They had to get the warrant, and they had to retrieve the material. Part of me wonders if they’ll ever have strong enough case to press charges—He will deny and lie and if they can’t prove he knew the documents were in his possession, it will be difficult to charge him—but they secured the material and that’s what matters.

Unless his fingerprints are on the documents/boxes.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Have we talked about Rand Paul yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have we talked about Rand Paul yet?

Yes but the guy’s a traitor. That the media just lets all this stuff slide is still astonishing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why? Because it has value.

Trump only sees dollar signs.

[Anonymous]

Can PP who referenced the murder suicides in Russia post a link? Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can PP who referenced the murder suicides in Russia post a link? Thanks.

DP, but here.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8790242/russian-oligarchs-suicides-ukraine/amp/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a tough spot. Iff a citizen is illegally storing nuclear secrets at their house, you take steps to secure them regardless of what the person’s last job might have been.

This. They had to get the warrant, and they had to retrieve the material. Part of me wonders if they’ll ever have strong enough case to press charges—He will deny and lie and if they can’t prove he knew the documents were in his possession, it will be difficult to charge him—but they secured the material and that’s what matters.

Unless his fingerprints are on the documents/boxes.

Maybe. It would be better if there is video of him handling the documents and testimony from witnesses who tie him to them.

Anyway, it just makes me suspicious that he is the one who made this a story by announcing the “raid”. And now I see everyone putting their eggs in one basket again, and it’s concerning. He has done many illegal, and dangerous things I’m sure. Justice needs to be done, but it needs to be done perfectly. Garland has to pitch a perfect game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can PP who referenced the murder suicides in Russia post a link? Thanks.

DP, but here.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8790242/russian-oligarchs-suicides-ukraine/amp/

Weren't there even more though, in the past few years?