Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just looked it up and they’ve been together since like September? Jesus Christ people! Why is anyone talking marriage and babies at all for a 3 month relationship between celebrities?!

She’s on record of saying it’s July. But only clarifying since you went to the trouble of looking it up.

A case of which fabrication do you want to believe? Here are the scenarios Taylors team put forth: Travis asked for a bracelet and going to tour, that Travis asked her to a game, that Travis spoke about her on a pod cast. Taylor now says the podcast was early on and so they faked the game and bracelet giving for the public. When there are so many smoke and mirrors, it is hard to keep track.

They both said after the podcast she got in touch with him and they started dating before they went public at the end of September. Literally nothing else was ever put out. The only smoke and mirrors are in your head.

[Anonymous]

Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

A lot of people didn’t feel it was fake, but I’m sure your posts reign supreme.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

A lot of people didn’t feel it was fake, but I’m sure your posts reign supreme.

The public hard launch was definitely staged. The car ride? Come on.

They had fun with it and knew people would go bonkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

A lot of people didn’t feel it was fake, but I’m sure your posts reign supreme.

Everyone on Lipstick Alley has been calling it a fake op from the get-go. The ladies on there are pretty keen about this sort of thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

A lot of people didn’t feel it was fake, but I’m sure your posts reign supreme.

The public hard launch was definitely staged. The car ride? Come on.

They had fun with it and knew people would go bonkers.

Nobody really went bonkers. It was and is shoved down our throats. He is the most commercialized athlete of 2023. And Swift is on the cover of literally every magazine at my local grocery store. None of this is organic appeal, it is astroturfed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go back and read the first 5 pages of this thread. They staged their first public appearances to generate interest. Everyone thought it felt weird and fake. If you want to have a revisionist history, that’s fine but don’t insult me to prove your point.

A lot of people didn’t feel it was fake, but I’m sure your posts reign supreme.

Yes, yes they do. That is why they call me:

Anonymous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You purposely tried to choose busted photos. Here’s how Travis looked before his “glow up” and here’s the entire Kelce stock. If y’all think Swift is marrying into let alone reproducing with this stock you are cray cray

Truly do not see much difference in attractiveness.

Travis is a beard-fish. Just Google what he looks like without facial hair and you will see the difference

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You purposely tried to choose busted photos. Here’s how Travis looked before his “glow up” and here’s the entire Kelce stock. If y’all think Swift is marrying into let alone reproducing with this stock you are cray cray

Truly do not see much difference in attractiveness.

Travis is a beard-fish. Just Google what he looks like without facial hair and you will see the difference

DP - Travis isn’t pretty like Joe is, but who cares? He’s plenty attractive, facial hair or no. Besides, Joe Alwyn almost never sees the light of day, so his beauty is largely moot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aw Travis is a cutie. So is Joe. They both have a different vibe though. I am definitely more of the quiet joe typed

It’s cool that Joe wrote songs and music with her and agree he is cute. But if he doesn’t want a public relationship than Tay ain’t the girl for him. Seems like they got together when she was in the phase of hibernating and taking a break, and then the pandemic hit. but at some point that was not sustainable.

Yes so much better to go with a clout chaser…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You purposely tried to choose busted photos. Here’s how Travis looked before his “glow up” and here’s the entire Kelce stock. If y’all think Swift is marrying into let alone reproducing with this stock you are cray cray

Truly do not see much difference in attractiveness.

Travis is a beard-fish. Just Google what he looks like without facial hair and you will see the difference

DP - Travis isn’t pretty like Joe is, but who cares? He’s plenty attractive, facial hair or no. Besides, Joe Alwyn almost never sees the light of day, so his beauty is largely moot.

And just like that the goal post moves again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You purposely tried to choose busted photos. Here’s how Travis looked before his “glow up” and here’s the entire Kelce stock. If y’all think Swift is marrying into let alone reproducing with this stock you are cray cray

Truly do not see much difference in attractiveness.

Travis is a beard-fish. Just Google what he looks like without facial hair and you will see the difference

DP - Travis isn’t pretty like Joe is, but who cares? He’s plenty attractive, facial hair or no. Besides, Joe Alwyn almost never sees the light of day, so his beauty is largely moot.

NP. Joe Alwyn is like if mayonnaise was a person

[Anonymous]

Travis didn't get her the ring. Her friend and called out deumoxi using her real name lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You purposely tried to choose busted photos. Here’s how Travis looked before his “glow up” and here’s the entire Kelce stock. If y’all think Swift is marrying into let alone reproducing with this stock you are cray cray

Truly do not see much difference in attractiveness.

Travis is a beard-fish. Just Google what he looks like without facial hair and you will see the difference

DP - Travis isn’t pretty like Joe is, but who cares? He’s plenty attractive, facial hair or no. Besides, Joe Alwyn almost never sees the light of day, so his beauty is largely moot.

NP. Joe Alwyn is like if mayonnaise was a person

LOL

[Anonymous]

I wonder if she is preggers