Spirit Coach

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow a back talker?


Back talking a coach, a parent, a teacher, etc is a sign of disrespect and a red flag.

The fact that you don’t see that as an issue explains why we are where we are.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow a back talker?


*Back talked the coaches like they were not on her level

Yeah, back talking is bad when her level is NWSL. Want to talk about market level sans endorsements? Sans USWNT which is driven on societal virtue signaling? Just check out her salary without the USSF subsidy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow a back talker?


*Back talked the coaches like they were not on her level

Yeah, back talking is bad when her level is NWSL. Want to talk about market level sans endorsements? Sans USWNT which is driven on societal virtue signaling? Just check out her salary without the USSF subsidy.


Back talking on any level is bad because it undermines the authority of the coach….if the coach allows it. If he doesn’t allow it, it causes conflict which plays out like cancer. This is why college coaches pay attention to the personality of the recruit.

At the NWSL level they are suppose to take a professional approach.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I watched Pugh at a training session. Her attitude was awful. Back talked the coaches like they were not on her level.


This is accurate. Also never comfortable with her celebrity. Maturity sucked as did work ethic
Anonymous
Back talking a coach is good. They need it. They often at all levels but certainly that level do not know it all. Now you get fired if you do it if you are not a star. Ever watch Tom Brady. He has yelled at every coach he has except BB.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Back talking a coach is good. They need it. They often at all levels but certainly that level do not know it all. Now you get fired if you do it if you are not a star. Ever watch Tom Brady. He has yelled at every coach he has except BB.


Back talking and bringing passion is good and most coaches don’t mind - it’s when a player is not coachable that is causes an issue. Really? Tom Brady? We are talking about small time / up and coming young professionals not hall of fame
Anonymous
Back talking is totally fine in pro sports. Most of you dont understand its a totally different environment. As long as you can keep it within the team there is usually mutual respect. Its ok if two teammates fistfight each other as long as left within the team. For those of you who dont know. This type of thing happens at EVERY pro sports team.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I read a post above about Pugh being uncoachable. That was partially the case. She lacked the pedigree (readinees) that Rodman has to be away from home, independently to work on her craft. The entire organization had high hopes for her. Remember she wanted Europe over the NWSL and US Soccer convinced her to compete locally in the NWSL. She had an injury history from overuse in her youth and was a bit physically fragile. The WS traded her for picks at the draft and it was a brilliant stroke of gamesmanship. At the draft RB said that he really really liked Mallory and wanted to do everything he could to help her stay but there was a deal on the table that had a chance to improve the club immediately that could not be passed up. I mentioned to RB "it's always better to lose a player a year early, than a year late as you will get max value in trades,etc - it's what many MLB GM's do" He agreed with the perspective. (NO I AM NOT PART OF WS but I did attend the draft).

Irony is that after the trade, she started to fall out of favor on the USWNT, and then Gotham and pursuing endorsements and became less about hard-work, grit and soccer. (Ex: check her instagram vs the other players on the USWNT). She's capable but needs to grow up a bit.

All that happened after the trade showed RB and LB they were right.

Now....was RB harsh on MP? Perhaps? But when you have a superstar not giving a star effort...why caudle?

2 cents...


And the first-round pick it got from Pugh this year turned out to be Rodman.
Anonymous
Back talking is ok when the player has a valid point. Else it is a waste of everyone’s time and is whining. My guess is Pugh had not point which is why her career has tanked.
Anonymous
You understand she is doing well for Chicago and now is the ripe old age of 23.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You understand she is doing well for Chicago and now is the ripe old age of 23.


“Doing well” vs. being the next big USWNT superstar is tanking IMHO. I didn’t say she sucked, just that she’s dropped from the precipice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He will have a home at Bethesda Soccer.


Mom or Dad of kid who cries every game or couldn't make a team?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You understand she is doing well for Chicago and now is the ripe old age of 23.


“Doing well” vs. being the next big USWNT superstar is tanking IMHO. I didn’t say she sucked, just that she’s dropped from the precipice.


DP. There is no shame in needing time to mature and get your body healthy. She is playing well now and still has time for the USWNT. I wish her the best.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You understand she is doing well for Chicago and now is the ripe old age of 23.


“Doing well” vs. being the next big USWNT superstar is tanking IMHO. I didn’t say she sucked, just that she’s dropped from the precipice.


DP. There is no shame in needing time to mature and get your body healthy. She is playing well now and still has time for the USWNT. I wish her the best.


It’s a big jump from travel soccer to the pro’s. Big difference between playing against 17 year olds vs grown women.
Anonymous
Pugh was the youngest American to score in the Olympics in 2016 at the age of 18.

It's not that she needs time to mature, it's that she has regressed in her place with the national team and with the expectations of her being a future leader of the squad. She still has time, but it's fair to point out her form has dropped and her attitude has been factor noted at club and by Vlato.
post reply Forum Index » Soccer
Message Quick Reply
Go to: