Loudoun Soccer Showcase

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

Well, since you want to be like that. Let me give you my two cents.

VDA out possessed, out shot, out defended and all around out played FCV on that particular day. There wasn’t a person that watched that game that didn’t walk away saying VDA was the better team ... on that day. And yes, many people not associated with either team were watching...to include Loudoun players and parents. Does FCV have good players. Sure. So does VDA and that’s why the game is played. The truth of the matter is that it could have easily been 3-0 in favor of VDA if the opportunities were finished...but it could have never been the other way around because FCV had one legit (maybe 2) shots on goal. Every other opportunity was set pieces. Which FCV excels at. The one goal they scored was on a set piece outside the box on a handball call. It was a quality shot by a good player. Wasn’t surprised.

The three goals called back were due to reckless play (fouls) on set pieces. All of which were properly called. And yes, the game was properly officiated.

1. You cannot head the ball out of the goalies hands.
2. You can not slam the goalie and force her to drop the ball (foul)
3. You can not run at the goalie full speed and slam her into the back of the net (Foul - extremely reckless and should have been carded)

Again. FCV is a good team with good players. The fact that you can’t acknowledge that VDA has talent as well is ridiculous. The team that played better did not win. I’m sure Christian told the girls such.

[Anonymous]

Unsure how the PP stretched from 2004 VDA to asking what a team two years younger would do (2006s)...? Game was between two good 2004 teams and doubtful of a younger team just barnstorming an otherwise very talented '04 FCV team. Stay humble

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unsure how the PP stretched from 2004 VDA to asking what a team two years younger would do (2006s)...? Game was between two good 2004 teams and doubtful of a younger team just barnstorming an otherwise very talented '04 FCV team. Stay humble

The last four or so post have been about the 2004s....no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unsure how the PP stretched from 2004 VDA to asking what a team two years younger would do (2006s)...? Game was between two good 2004 teams and doubtful of a younger team just barnstorming an otherwise very talented '04 FCV team. Stay humble

The last four or so post have been about the 2004s....no?

Yes, they were, I'm asking why was some 2006 team brought in to discuss beating a good FCV 2004 team? That was my question...

[Anonymous]

It’s almost the 1 anniversary of Loudoun’s heist stealing money mostly from low income families. But at least they’re creating champions for life though 🤑

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost the 1 anniversary of Loudoun’s heist stealing money mostly from low income families. But at least they’re creating champions for life though 🤑

If you close your eyes, click your heels, and repeat this three times, Loudoun will disappear and people will care about your club.

[Anonymous]

“There’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV”

Yes there is...Metro United

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unsure how the PP stretched from 2004 VDA to asking what a team two years younger would do (2006s)...? Game was between two good 2004 teams and doubtful of a younger team just barnstorming an otherwise very talented '04 FCV team. Stay humble

The last four or so post have been about the 2004s....no?

Yes, they were, I'm asking why was some 2006 team brought in to discuss beating a good FCV 2004 team? That was my question...

An FCV parent, I suspect, got confused about the age group being discussed (2006-07) and began talking about 2004 when no one was discussing it. The conversation shifted from there. Happens all the time here because people react before reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“There’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV”

Yes there is...Metro United

Where is Metro based out of??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“There’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV, there’s no place like FCV”

Yes there is...Metro United

Where is Metro based out of??

Great Falls, VA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

post the film? you can say this over and over again because there is no way for anyone to "watch the film"!!
Sock Puppet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

Well, since you want to be like that. Let me give you my two cents.

VDA out possessed, out shot, out defended and all around out played FCV on that particular day. There wasn’t a person that watched that game that didn’t walk away saying VDA was the better team ... on that day. And yes, many people not associated with either team were watching...to include Loudoun players and parents. Does FCV have good players. Sure. So does VDA and that’s why the game is played. The truth of the matter is that it could have easily been 3-0 in favor of VDA if the opportunities were finished...but it could have never been the other way around because FCV had one legit (maybe 2) shots on goal. Every other opportunity was set pieces. Which FCV excels at. The one goal they scored was on a set piece outside the box on a handball call. It was a quality shot by a good player. Wasn’t surprised.

The three goals called back were due to reckless play (fouls) on set pieces. All of which were properly called. And yes, the game was properly officiated.

1. You cannot head the ball out of the goalies hands.
2. You can not slam the goalie and force her to drop the ball (foul)
3. You can not run at the goalie full speed and slam her into the back of the net (Foul - extremely reckless and should have been carded)

Again. FCV is a good team with good players. The fact that you can’t acknowledge that VDA has talent as well is ridiculous. The team that played better did not win. I’m sure Christian told the girls such.



You don't know Christian! And I think I actually heard Bobby's "coaching" from my house!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

post the film? you can say this over and over again because there is no way for anyone to "watch the film"!!
Sock Puppet




I have the film and paid for downloads. So no problem, tell me how to post here and I will most definitely post them for all to see that the poster is completely accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?

I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.

All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.

Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.

post the film? you can say this over and over again because there is no way for anyone to "watch the film"!!
Sock Puppet

I have the film and paid for downloads. So no problem, tell me how to post here and I will most definitely post them for all to see that the poster is completely accurate.

It's called YouTube.