Breaking: Cohen exploring possible plea deal to be reached as early as today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The President of the United States is implicated in high crimes and misdomeanors.

Will the Congress do a darned thing about it?

Of course not. But GOP if Trump-supporting congressman keep getting indicted at the current rate that could change!

[Anonymous]

It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

[Anonymous]

Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

Read up on the Sen John Edwards case law and then come back to reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1032080049980272640

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you show me that statute please? Isn't blackmail a crime? Can you show me for a fact that campaign funds were used?

Everything that is used for a political campaign is considered campaign funds. There is nothing on the money that reads "campaign funds".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

What do people not get? Of course they didn't pay for it out of campaign funds. If they did, and they declared it, it would be public and thus may have been damaging to the candidacy. The whole point is that they DIDN'T pay for it out of campaign funds, when in fact it was in support of the campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1032080049980272640

Yup. Tip of the iceberg. The Drip Drip Drip is about to become a deluge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1032080049980272640

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1032080049980272640

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my. Lanny davis just said on MSNBC that Cohen has evidence of Trump’s knowledge of computer crimes/hacking.

H

F

S

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1032080049980272640

Every time I think my eyes can’t open any wider while watching the news, I am shocked again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

Ummm. No. You are wrong. So sit there is your wrongness and be wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

Ummm. No. You are wrong. So sit there is your wrongness and be wrong.

+1. Michael Cohen just pleaded guilty to a felony tonight. How is Trump less guilty than Cohen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would only matter if the cash came from campaign funds, which FEC had already looked into and has said that the campaign has not violated any campaign finance laws. SO a big fat nothing burger with extra liberal tears.

Ummm. No. You are wrong. So sit there is your wrongness and be wrong.

+1. Michael Cohen just pleaded guilty to a felony tonight. How is Trump less guilty than Cohen?

Also in the indictment - the Trump Organization paid Cohen $420,000 for his $130,000 Stormy Daniels stunt, which opens up the possibility of indicting the Trump Organization.