Chelsea Clinton's husband closing Greek-focused hf after losing 90% of investors asstes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Can you tell us what the firm's ROI is?

Huh? Does his attractiveness as a husband depend on his ROI?

Were you anesthetized prior to the lobotomy? See bolded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Seriously. What DID she see in him? Or did mama hillary just have her personal reasons for the union?

When did the Clintons first meet his parents anyway?

I give you a bit of hint: his Mom was a Congresswoman when Clinton was President. Chelsea has been friends with her future husband since she was a preteen. Are you the same obsessive nutbag who is constsntly posting about Ivanka?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Can you tell us what the firm's ROI is?

Huh? Does his attractiveness as a husband depend on his ROI?

Were you anesthetized prior to the lobotomy? See bolded.

I feel like you might need to calm down. Take deep breathes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Can you tell us what the firm's ROI is?

Huh? Does his attractiveness as a husband depend on his ROI?

Were you anesthetized prior to the lobotomy? See bolded.

I feel like you might need to calm down. Take deep breathes.

Tomorrow, after you get some rest, you can explain it all to me. Okay

[Anonymous]

In the quest for Jewish husbands, ivanka had much better taste than Chelsea. That reflects on their parents - Donald and ivana > billary.

What were they teaching Chelsea?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the quest for Jewish husbands, ivanka had much better taste than Chelsea. That reflects on their parents - Donald and ivana > billary.

What were they teaching Chelsea?

Bill and Hillary weren't teaching Chelsea much of anything, as they were mostly gone doing more important things. Either Chelsea raised herself or she had the nannies. Never heard about any family helping.

Michelle had it best having her mother do most of the parenting work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:40 million dollars he stole.

Of course, that is just a dent compared the the Bill and Hillary slush fund.

Or the millions Drumpf swindled out of working people with his University scam, or the contractors he's stiffed, or the people whose lives were ruined when they got stuck holding the bag from his many bankruptcies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.

Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.

Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mezvinsky is not disqualified from running a hedge fund because his MIL is running for President.

He WAS running a hedge fund because of who his in laws are...Get it?

No one would have put him in charge of their $ otherwise. These investors were currying favor with the Clintons by investing with little Markie.

He lost 90% of the assets and you didn't hear any of his clients suing. Even some of Madoff's victims got half of their money back. All his clients wanted were favors from Hillary. They don't care if all the money is lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mezvinsky is not disqualified from running a hedge fund because his MIL is running for President.

He WAS running a hedge fund because of who his in laws are...Get it?

No one would have put him in charge of their $ otherwise. These investors were currying favor with the Clintons by investing with little Markie.

He lost 90% of the assets and you didn't hear any of his clients suing. Even some of Madoff's victims got half of their money back. All his clients wanted were favors from Hillary. They don't care if all the money is lost.

Bingo! What a scam.

[Anonymous]

Same ridiculous poster agreeing with himself. The idea that Hillary was less involved in raising Chelsea than the Donald was with respect to his own kids, who were sent off to boarding school, is priceless. You are really too much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Same ridiculous poster agreeing with himself. The idea that Hillary was less involved in raising Chelsea than the Donald was with respect to his own kids, who were sent off to boarding school, is priceless. You are really too much.

One of the reasons smart parents turn out amazing children, is that they understand the critical importance the following three ingredients during early childhood: 1. Stability 2. Competence 3. Love.

I think Trump married women who understood this, and were willing to sacrifice their own careers to some degree. I have no idea who had been Chelsea's primary caregiver during her infancy and toddlerhood, except I doubt it was Bill, Hillary, or other family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Seriously. What DID she see in him? Or did mama hillary just have her personal reasons for the union?

When did the Clintons first meet his parents anyway?

I give you a bit of hint: his Mom was a Congresswoman when Clinton was President. Chelsea has been friends with her future husband since she was a preteen. Are you the same obsessive nutbag who is constsntly posting about Ivanka?

Probably an arranged marriage from the get-go. Win-win for the grandparents who all benefited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice choice Chelsea. No only do you pick a slimy guy from a slimy family, he's a fraud at what he does.

I thought Jewish men make the best husband's.

He's not good at his job. He doesn't seem particularly charming. And he's not very handsome. Seriously, I'd like to think I'd do better if I were dealt Chelsea's hand.

Seriously. What DID she see in him? Or did mama hillary just have her personal reasons for the union?

When did the Clintons first meet his parents anyway?

I give you a bit of hint: his Mom was a Congresswoman when Clinton was President. Chelsea has been friends with her future husband since she was a preteen. Are you the same obsessive nutbag who is constsntly posting about Ivanka?

Probably an arranged marriage from the get-go. Win-win for the grandparents who all benefited.

wow, I guess conspiracy theorists are bipartisan after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mezvinsky is not disqualified from running a hedge fund because his MIL is running for President.

He WAS running a hedge fund because of who his in laws are...Get it?

No one would have put him in charge of their $ otherwise. These investors were currying favor with the Clintons by investing with little Markie.

He lost 90% of the assets and you didn't hear any of his clients suing. Even some of Madoff's victims got half of their money back. All his clients wanted were favors from Hillary. They don't care if all the money is lost.

That he lost money makes the investment a bad investment. It doesn't make him a fraud, like Madoff.

It was, however, a very nice way to curry favor with the Clinton's.