^^
I also think that Cheney should be tried for war crimes. |
Interesting article on Japan and their position with not allowing Muslims:
http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-land-without-muslims/2013/05/19/0/ |
+3 Registered Independent who has voted Democrat almost every single election cycle. Now that my gay friends have their rights, I'm done too. Coming to this board and seeing the absolute nastiness, the classless name calling and lack of basic common sense from the left has cemented it! Keep it up DCUM, you are creating more Republican voters by the day! |
You guys should all vote for Trump. He is never nasty and never calls people names. |
G'bye. |
That is the worst response you've ever posted. I'm disappointed. And I'm going to +1 my post! |
“the only religion that acts like the mafia, that will fucking kill you if you say the wrong thing, draw the wrong picture or write the wrong book.”
can we not find some other people to lead? do we really want to follow Islam down the rabbit hole. |
Read my comments above, they answer your questions. I'm beginning to believe you are the bigot here. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You keep flip flopping between opining about individual belief levels and Religion itself. They are not the same thing. And to try to make a comparison between the two is idiotic. So I'll say this again, hopefully it sinks in this time. I'm only concerned about an individual putting religion above common sense, no matter the religion. Get it??????? If not, then start another thread that compares just religions and their political acceptance levels. Take the individual element out of it. |
Seems to me that for hundreds and hundreds of years, that too was the legacy of the Catholic church. |
Is it still that way today? And does it make it ok? |
This response really doesn't seem to fit the discussion it followed. Are you sure that you read my post? This conversation began with me asking for examples of polices that a Muslim President might espouse that were unacceptable. The example provided was a hypothetical restriction on eating pork. I asked if you have the same concern about a Jewish President. Both religions have the same restriction. It is not clear to me why you would not treat both hypothetical examples similarly. You say you are only concerned about an individual putting religion above common sense (I believe you mean common good). If that is the case, do you have this concern about members of all religions, or just those who practice Islam? If it is about members of all religions, we are on the same page. But, then I am not sure why you are debating me. |
I'm beginning to realize that you don't realize that your opinions are just that. You actually think you are 100% correct about everything you say. |
I guess when Christianity declares Jihad on America, we can make those judgment calls - which is what Carson was doing. Islam is indeed non-compatible with the Constitution. If it wasn't, they would not be trying to set up Sharia law here. |
|
I realized long ago that you don't know the meaning of "opinion". You seem to believe that if something is an "opinion", it is off-limits for discussion. If someone says, "In my opinion, all Klingons are low-life thugs", we are not required to simply smile and say, "I respect your opinion". We are free to say that your opinion is wrong because there are Klingons who are not low-life thugs. As Ben Carson wrote, "there are 1.4 billion Muslims in the world and to paint them with a single philosophical brush is just as absurd as trying to characterize the diverse thinking of billions of Christians around the world.". That is factual. Posters who are trying to do such painting are simply wrong. Whether it is their opinion that a diverse group can be painted with a single brush or they believe it is fact that this diverse group can be painted with a single brush is immaterial. They are wrong either way. It shouldn't take a brain surgeon to point that out. |