Um, I was making fun of the suggestion earlier in this thread that they build a school there. So follow along, simmer down and stop calling me "lady!" |
Thank you, I accept your apology. Going forward, you should feel free to concern yourself with things that "pertain to your children's education" so long as you promise to remember that other kids matter too. Also, I don't get the big deal with busing. Just drive your kids if it bothers you so much. Almost all the parents in my school's walking zone drive their kids to school anyway, because they work and don't have time to walk their kids to school and then walk home. But then again I rode a bus over an hour each way to and from school every day growing up. It was a lot of fun and I got to hang out with my friends, so I don't see it as a cause for getting out the pitchforks. |
AMEN!! +1,000,000 |
| Very well said and gives me hope there are level-headed people posting here to balance the heat! AMEN seconded!!! |
Actually, I think no kid who is within walking distance of their school should be put on a bus to another school. It's bad for the environment, and a waste of taxpayer money. There are ways this can be done even with the ridiculous base assumptions that have accompanied this process. Of course it would be a lot easier if APS had put everything on the table, but that would be far too sensible. |
There's nothing wrong with buses when needed but it's a waste of money, bad for the environment and for traffic to bus kids to a distant school, who in some cases can see the school from their house and will be bused a couple miles away (e.g. Taylor can walk across a ballfield to the school and not even cross a street). If there were no feasible solution that would prevent this, fine. But there are a number of workable solutions that would ensure no current walkers become busers, and it's unclear why those options are not on the table. |