Please post McMansion pictures here!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I'd take this in a heartbeat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a beauty
Yep, thats the whole yard and it's right on a busy road

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/thecourtyard/just%20up%20the%20pike/Big-AssMcMansionOnRandolph.jpg

This is very close to the intersection of Randolph and New Hampshire in Colesville, isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd take this in a heartbeat.

Me too. (The simple fact that it has functional, architecturally correct shutters puts it outside the McMansion category).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd take this in a heartbeat.

Me too. (The simple fact that it has functional, architecturally correct shutters puts it outside the McMansion category).

LOL BIG GIANT BOX

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd take this in a heartbeat.

Although the house is handsome, the amount of land is disproportionate, as is the size of the front portico/porch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is this a duplex?!

Either that or this family has some strange need for two mailboxes, two garages and two front doors (one on either side of the house).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not entirely on Street Maps, but the beginning of the neighborhood is:

http://goo.gl/maps/9VxLt

I drive past it every day from Wilson Lane. Notice how close each house it. I think you can reach from one kitchen to the other to borrow a cup of sugar.

If you check out the aerial view, it's pretty clear where mcmansion ville starts and ends...

[Anonymous]

e

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd take this in a heartbeat.

Although the house is handsome, the amount of land is disproportionate, as is the size of the front portico/porch.

My parents live in a town with a lot of "old money" and there are whole neighborhoods of gorgeous 100-year-old victorians around this size on smaller plots of land.

Are those houses mcmansions too??!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

big, over the top, and mansion, yes... mcmansion, no... reason? It's actually scaled somewhat properly, uses expensive materials (surprised the hoodrats didn't try to steal the copper off of it (but this nw hood probably has full-time private security), and 50 years from now with some real trees and landscaping, it might be more comparable to the 1932 house that was improperly posted... now don't get me wrong, I don't like this house at all, but it's in a much higher league than those beauties in arlington...

[Anonymous]

If you're asking yourself "Is this a McMansion?", first consider that McDonalds didn't exist before the mid-50s, and it didn't have its modern reputation til much later. Tacking "Mc" onto something to denote "cheap, ubiquitous, reliable low quality" probably didn't start til the late 70s or so.

Therefore, no house built before 1955 (and I would argue 1975) can possibly be called a McMansion.

[Anonymous]

http://sandyspringbuilders.com/plan-your-home/lots-and-homes-sale/4404-w-street-nw-washington-dc-foxhallphillips-park

This entire neighborhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://sandyspringbuilders.com/plan-your-home/lots-and-homes-sale/4404-w-street-nw-washington-dc-foxhallphillips-park

This entire neighborhood.

winner

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://sandyspringbuilders.com/plan-your-home/lots-and-homes-sale/4404-w-street-nw-washington-dc-foxhallphillips-park

This entire neighborhood.

winner

Totally. I can't believe it took 13 pages for someone to point these homes out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We have a winner!

Definitely the winner!

It looks like a walrus.