Biden Insiders Confess He Was Severely Cognitively Impaired

[Anonymous]

And they got mad at President Jed Bartlett for hiding his medical problems too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we talking about this now? We have bigger problems.

It's apparently never the right time to talk about Democrat failures. We got shouted down during his administration. Then shouted down during the campaign. Then shouted down during Kamala's campaign. Now, years out from the next election with plenty of time to assess the mistakes of the previous administration in order to make a better showing next time, it's still apparently not okay to discuss the fact that these people lied to us on a daily basis for months maybe even years.

Trump is a disaster. The Democrats are our only real alternative. If we can't hold them accountable, then we may as well accept that our government no longer belongs to us. We get whoever and whatever the elites decide is good for them and good enough for us.

If you refuse to make your own party accountable to you, it's not your party. You're just cosigning whatever they tell you to.

The only way to make democrats accountable is to refuse to vote them in. The alternative sucks but it’s still better than modern day democrats.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was so worried we would nominate him again! What a relief! Good thing the current occupant of the White House is a stable genius surrounded by only the best and brightest and is leading our country to new heights!

Leave it to Democrats to find a nominee worse than Joe Biden! Congratulations!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we talking about this now? We have bigger problems.

It's apparently never the right time to talk about Democrat failures. We got shouted down during his administration. Then shouted down during the campaign. Then shouted down during Kamala's campaign. Now, years out from the next election with plenty of time to assess the mistakes of the previous administration in order to make a better showing next time, it's still apparently not okay to discuss the fact that these people lied to us on a daily basis for months maybe even years.

Trump is a disaster. The Democrats are our only real alternative. If we can't hold them accountable, then we may as well accept that our government no longer belongs to us. We get whoever and whatever the elites decide is good for them and good enough for us.

If you refuse to make your own party accountable to you, it's not your party. You're just cosigning whatever they tell you to.

The only way to make democrats accountable is to refuse to vote them in. The alternative sucks but it’s still better than modern day democrats.

You voted Dementia Don into office and are showing absolutely zero accountability for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was so worried we would nominate him again! What a relief! Good thing the current occupant of the White House is a stable genius surrounded by only the best and brightest and is leading our country to new heights!

Leave it to Democrats to find a nominee worse than Joe Biden! Congratulations!

The nominee worse than Joe Biden was Donald Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In any state of cognitive powers (which is totally Trumper bunk), Biden always upheld the Constitution and didn't act like the other 2 branches of government didn't exist.

No threats posted online to judges you disagree with. And Biden never acted like he was a Russian agent. Never confused who our ALLIES were.

In any age he was better than Trump, the dictator

No they posted the threats right outside their houses, with protests by Friends of Jane. An assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh.

There was never an assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh. Why does this trope continued to be repeated?

A guy had a mental breakdown in Chevy Chase MD...at no time was Kavanugh's life in danger and there was never an overt threat in any manner.

He had on him the Gretchen Whitmer kidnap kit.

[Anonymous]

Okay but what impact does that have on anything now?

While conservatives would love to distract from Trump's failings by going back to a focus on Biden (again), he's irrelevant. Biden wasn't on the ballot or a candidate for the presidency, and now we have Trump to deal with.

To be honest, Trump's economic policy (tariffs and unnecessary trade war with strongest allies), having his Nat Sec discuss classified info on insecure signal, DOGE's behavior (delete archives of all women and POC, fire veterans, fire thousands from health related agencies, cut all services) seems worse than cognitive impaired - Trump's behavior and actions in just 2-3 months in office seem unwise, dumb and against the interests of any moral country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was so worried we would nominate him again! What a relief! Good thing the current occupant of the White House is a stable genius surrounded by only the best and brightest and is leading our country to new heights!

Leave it to Democrats to find a nominee worse than Joe Biden! Congratulations!

The nominee worse than Joe Biden was Donald Trump.

And yet, your side lost. You should reflect on that. Can’t even beat DT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reagan was diagnosed with Alzheimer's his entire last term as president. I have no doubt that as soon as trump is dead there will be a book by every member of his cabinet that Trump had Alzheimer's.

There is an age minimum for President, House members and Senate members. We need an age maximum and it should be that no one over age 70 is eligible for president, vice president, House or Senate.

Not true.

His son Ron said he had Alzheimer's in the White House.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/17/ronald-reagan-alzheimers-president-son

Oh, well if Ron Jr. said so…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was so worried we would nominate him again! What a relief! Good thing the current occupant of the White House is a stable genius surrounded by only the best and brightest and is leading our country to new heights!

Leave it to Democrats to find a nominee worse than Joe Biden! Congratulations!

The nominee worse than Joe Biden was Donald Trump.

And yet, your side lost. You should reflect on that. Can’t even beat DT.

Uh, he did beat DT. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we talking about this now? We have bigger problems.

It's apparently never the right time to talk about Democrat failures. We got shouted down during his administration. Then shouted down during the campaign. Then shouted down during Kamala's campaign. Now, years out from the next election with plenty of time to assess the mistakes of the previous administration in order to make a better showing next time, it's still apparently not okay to discuss the fact that these people lied to us on a daily basis for months maybe even years.

Trump is a disaster. The Democrats are our only real alternative. If we can't hold them accountable, then we may as well accept that our government no longer belongs to us. We get whoever and whatever the elites decide is good for them and good enough for us.

If you refuse to make your own party accountable to you, it's not your party. You're just cosigning whatever they tell you to.

The only way to make democrats accountable is to refuse to vote them in. The alternative sucks but it’s still better than modern day democrats.

I think the last 2 months have more than adequately proved you wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll take Biden and my old 401k back in a heartbeat.

+1000! It is not even a close.

But but but...what about what about!!!???

Trump BAD, Dems GOOD.

Are you capable of anything else? Do you really think the Biden Administration is the best we can do? Do you really believe there can be no legitimate criticism of Democrats just because Trump sucks?

Yes, Trump sucks. We get it. But Democrats are going to have to come with something better than "Trump sucks" if they intend to keep him from destroying everything. For whatever reason, people chose that guy over our candidate. Maybe let's stop being childish and consider the many legitimate reasons why people are rejecting our party.

Not really. He can just keep tanking 401(k)s, denying old people social security payments and calling them frauds when they complain, and letting children die of measles.

Enjoy that bed you made republicans.
Sorry you didn’t like her laugh.
No ones job to save you from yourself, aren’t you the party of individual responsibility?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In any state of cognitive powers (which is totally Trumper bunk), Biden always upheld the Constitution and didn't act like the other 2 branches of government didn't exist.

You don't remember that he signed an order to forgive student loans--while admitting it was unconstitutional?

Also, Trump seems to be reclaiming Article II powers seized by the other branches. This has been done before by past presidents. That's upholding the Constitution. It will be up to the Supreme Court to decide if he's right or wrong. In the case of Biden claiming the power to forgive student loans, he never had it in the first place, but was casting about aimlessly to try and keep a campaign promise.

Tell us these great Presidents

I know you'll pull out some names but your side always leaves out something.

Try to keep it in the 20th century if you can

Certainly.

President Biden (successful) - Collins v. Yellen - The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 violated the separation of powers by creating a single director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, removable by the President only “for cause.” On the day of the decision, President Joe Biden moved forward with replacing FHFA director, Mark A. Calabria, who had been appointed under Donald Trump, "with an appointee who reflects the Administration's values".

President Obama (successful) - Zivotofsky v. Kerry - Under the Reception Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, only the President may grant formal recognition to a foreign sovereign, and Congress may not pass a law under its own authority to grant formal recognition or require the President to override a prior official determination of recognition. It was an improper act for Congress to “aggrandiz[e] its power at the expense of another branch” by requiring the President to contradict an earlier recognition determination in an official document issued by the Executive Branch. Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U. S. 868, 878 (1991) . To allow Congress to control the President’s communication in the context of a formal recognition determination is to allow Congress to exercise that exclusive power itself. As a result, the statute is unconstitutional. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion.

President Obama (failed) - NLRB v. Canning - The Recess Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers the President to fill any existing vacancy during any recess—intra-session or inter-session—of sufficient length, but three days is not sufficient length. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Breyer, writing for the Court, stated, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business."

President Reagan (successful) - Bowsher v. Synar - The court held that the Comptroller General's role in exercising executive functions under the Act's deficit reduction process violated the constitutionally imposed doctrine of separation of powers because the Comptroller General is removable only by a congressional joint resolution or by impeachment, and Congress may not retain the power of removal over an officer performing executive powers. To permit the execution of the laws to be vested in an officer answerable only to Congress would, in practical terms, reserve in Congress control of the execution of the laws. The structure of the Constitution does not permit Congress to execute the laws; it follows that Congress cannot grant to an officer under its control what it does not possess.

Which one of those involves completely disrupting the rule of law?

What does "disrupting the rule of law" mean? The President believes he is properly exercising his Article II powers, which would seem to be upholding the rule of law. It is up to the Supreme Court to decide whether he is right.

Nobody who has even a sliver of knowledge of the U.S. Constitution will believe this completely specious argument.

What specious argument? You mean the same argument that past Presidents have used to reclaim their Article II powers from the Legislative Branch? Please provide your 100% infallible argument that President Trump is acting outside his constitutional authority. If this were the case, impeachment and removal from office would be a slam dunk. But it's not, and you know it.

lol please give us your “100% infallible argument” that Trump is not trampling on fundamental constitutional principles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we talking about this now? We have bigger problems.

It's apparently never the right time to talk about Democrat failures. We got shouted down during his administration. Then shouted down during the campaign. Then shouted down during Kamala's campaign. Now, years out from the next election with plenty of time to assess the mistakes of the previous administration in order to make a better showing next time, it's still apparently not okay to discuss the fact that these people lied to us on a daily basis for months maybe even years.

Trump is a disaster. The Democrats are our only real alternative. If we can't hold them accountable, then we may as well accept that our government no longer belongs to us. We get whoever and whatever the elites decide is good for them and good enough for us.

If you refuse to make your own party accountable to you, it's not your party. You're just cosigning whatever they tell you to.

The only way to make democrats accountable is to refuse to vote them in. The alternative sucks but it’s still better than modern day democrats.

Thoughts and prayers dude, thoughts and prayers.

[Anonymous]

Found the republicans on dcum. I've been wondering why you all were awol on the other threads. Waiting to talk about the train ride to the port while the titanic you're on now sinks.