|
Private practice, especially with high overhead costs in this urban environment (rent, staff, etc), are not able to be sustainable if you take insurance.
Insurance only works for large corporations who use PCPs office to refer to the hospital and specialists that generate profits and so the PCPs are "loss leaders". If you want to see a doc who takes insurance, they usually have a panel of 3,000! Concierge has about 500-600 and that is still a lot of work. But at least they can devote more time and brain power to you. This country (Medicare, and thus insurance) doesn't value or reimburse primary care or preventative medicine. They pay for procedures and medications (some). |
| Yea when you allow insurances to have so much control + you allow politicians to feed you feel good stories (by dems which floods the market with too many patients and incentivizes volume) = shit service. Docs are pushing back. |
Sounds like we need more PCPs employed by health systems, then. The private practice system is broken. |
Large health systems treat pcps like crap. They measure them on productivity and force them to see patients every 15 minutes (then patients complain they are being rushed) and will place random patients on their schedules. For some it’s either leave medicine or go concierge just to maintain some autonomy and dignity in the practice of medicine. |
How does insuring thousands more who previously had no way of affording health insurance have anything to do with low reimbursements to PCPs. That was happening long before ACA which is not related. |
You should try it. You will get less than 15 min. Can’t get ahold of anyone. Docs are burning out and leaving. Mostly young docs or NPs and PAs who don’t really know how to practice medicine because they don’t have enough training. But those attached to hospitals can charge a “facilities fee” which you may have seen on your EOB. That helps them pay all the administrators. It’s crazy. Hospitals with clinics make crazy $$$. Just not the doctors. They make nothing and work like hamsters on a wheel….lots of admin work. Very little quality time with patients. Not sustainable if you actually care about people. |
+1 |
I’m the PP who posted about her friend the internist who transitioned to concierge. This PP is correct and clearly has some insider knowledge about how large health systems work. Hopkins, Inova, GW, and especially, especially MedStar. (I also work in healthcare but am not an MD in primary care) My friend used to work with one of the health systems I listed and grew depressed. Clinically, medicated depressed. Patients SHOULD be angry about the state of affairs but I wish they would stop directing their ire at “docs”. (Side note: so disrespectful. Clearly a flex to take ‘em down a notch. Do you call your kids’ teachers “teach” ? Or your clergyman “hey preach” ? ) As PP says, the problem starts with Medicare and private insurance. If you dislike having 8 minute appointments during which ol’ Doc spends 7 minutes charting bullshit metrics for the feds instead of looking at you in the eye … blame Medicare regs and BCBS Aetna UHC and MedStar et al. Ol’ Doc hates it as much as you do, guaranteed. |
| Concierge gets me an email for urgent things even on weekends and an appointment in a day or so. Take insurance? 3 months. |
Most concierge doctors take insurance. |
That's when I went concierge -- when the first available physical with my doctor was 6 months out. |
Interesting. My concierge doctor does not bill insurance, and she caps her practice at 400 or so. She spends about 30 mins with patients for follow ups. The physical was at least an hour and a half. She has a waiting list. |
Are you in the DMV? Most of them here already are. And workload is unsustainable for them and bad for patient care. |
Having recently moved, I was concerned about this, but was able to get an appointment quickly with an APN who is genuinely excellent, and seamlessly set up necessary referrals/labs. There are challenges to this new approach (longer wait times), but I was very pleasantly surprised at the upsides. The staff is less stressed because the workload is more balanced and coordinated, having all of the info in one place is a safety and stress benefit for patients, and overall, the experience felt somewhat concierge-like, even in a huge health system. Meanwhile, trying to coordinate dental health with several independent specialist providers has been much more stressful, with little to no electronic record management or autonomy on the patient side, occasionally very long wait times, and trying to discern what to do when the advice is conflicting (with second opinions often creating another round of the same process). So while most providers have been excellent, the sense of continuity and oversight has been more notable in the larger system. |
I'm not seeing an APN for my pcp. For multiple reasons. |