Was your competitive kid get shut out from all top 40 schools?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My DS applied for computer science. He did not get in to any top 50 in early action round, and I got the impression from these type of forums that regular decision was even more competitive. However, one top 40 deferral turned into an acceptance, and he was also accepted regular decision at a top 50. I would not say that I was worried at the time of the early action round, because it may not have been top 50, but he was accepted for an honors program and a respectable computer science department where he could have been happy too.



CS is a much harder major to get into than basically any other major. When people talk about admissions to a given school, the acceptance rates for different majors can be night and day.



This. Threads like this one are so misleading, even pointless. People: do some arithmetic. The demand for spots in CS across the country, in state flagships and in top privates, is insane relative to the number of spots available. What is more, top 20 schools do not want a campus full of career-oriented programmers. They want dancers, comparative literature majors, physicists, yes even gender studies majors. My son's close friend has mediocre grades, a 1550 and no ECs. Applied as a music major -- he is not that good, to be honest -- and was admitted to a number of schools (like Vanderbilt) to which he would not have had a chance in hell to be admitted in a more competitive major. Universities want to be universities, not CS coding camps.

Try to understand how a university/college works, and understand the game you are playing. Act accordingly. And no, your high stats kid does not deserve to be at Cornell or Rice. They applied in an ultracompetitive field and lost the spot to someone with a better application.

Yep because the country needs more dancers with $300k in loans


The world actually does pay some dancers and needs them. It’s mean to them, but it doesn’t need them.

It doesn’t need a lot of bright but soul dead CS drones who have no interest in CS but major in it, anyway, because that’s the only way Mummy and Daddy would pay for college. Those kids are in trouble.


There is nowhere near the demand for the number of graduates with soft majors that are churned out every years. Unless the school is HYPSM, all a large english/dance/history department does is ensure employment for history professors and applicants for law schools (because the one thing we need is more lawyers). Meanwhile applicants are clearly telling schools that there is more demand for business, engineering, computer science because students know that they will need to earn a living especially if they graduate with massive debt


You have a deep misunderstanding about the relationship between major and jobs. The vast majority of people do not get jobs connected to their major--and often switch jobs many times in their lives. The college education develops broad skills, you become marketable in many fields by figuring out ways to apply those broad skills and deepen your expertise.


Major is really most important if a student isn't summa cum laude, doesn't have good summer internship experience, and/or graduates in a down market. It's hard to predict any of these things (a little easier to predict the second) so if possible, students should hedge if going the LA route and do a double major in Econ and something they love that isn't as "practical" (Art History) or they should major in something more practical such as Econ but take a bunch of classes in other areas that they are interested in. If your kid absolutely cannot imagine a scenario where they do not do a single major in Dance or Art History they better work those internships.


Econ isn't that practical. My advice is if you're not into a highly marketable major, to major in whatever you enjoy that you can get a good GPA in and then acquire a practical skill that is in demand in the moment, get an internship or volunteer using that practical skill, and then use that to get your first job. Worked for me, worked for my kids.


Telling someone to acquire a marketable skill through an internship is essentially telling them to have connections


I wrote get a practical skill and then get an internship. For instance, my kid who is a psychology major, taught herself R Programming for statistical analysis. It's a marketable skill that gave her an edge in getting an internship with no connections where she did a lot more quantitative analysis. That's what got her a job--but she wouldn't have gotten the internship without having taught herself R. My older kid did the same with GIS. It's not that hard to learn a specific program well and if it's newly in demand it can be the thing that pushes you over the edge in the competition for a spot. In my son's case, he learned GIS and then volunteered himself to professor's projects saying that he wanted to build his GIS skills and then got an internship outside of academia that used GIS. At any given moment, there's a new skill that's in demand that can get your foot in the door.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not mine but she has a couple of friends that did. All kids that were taking post MVC math, post AP science. One started a charity for SN kids in the sport she participates in. Another, was a TA for the neuroscience class this year, and had done research for 3 summers. All high test scores and GPAs. And they are coming from one of the top private schools in the US.


That is seen as a privilege in admissions.


Not sure that tracks. My child attends one of the top private schools in the country and more than half the senior class is attending top 40 schools and more than 20% are going to Ivies. There certainly weren’t any shutouts of students of the caliber mentioned here.


Really all of that is seen as having significant privilege. The neuroscience research, the charity, the private school—all require money, parental involvement, connections


This is school that costs less than $30K. The kid was a TA for the neuroscience class at the school.


I have never heard of a high school having TAs for courses. I don't think this is as impressive as you think it is. As for the neuro research, was it published? Did the person win any awards - state or national? Or did they hang out with their parents' friends' friend at a hospital and d*ck around in an unpaid internship for nine hours a week over three months during the summer to boost their science/premed credentials? Also, a top private school that costs less than $30K. Where do you live? I'm sending my kid to preK at a top US private school and it's 44K not including the 4K deposit. I'll move right now.
Being a TA is not impressive it just means the school you were at had limited upper science options. It would have been more impressive to be taking another high level science ( as in two at a time) course themselves, or taking one at local college.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Are you the poster from the other thread who claimed everyone is deciding between Brown and Princeton or Stanford and MIT?

My kid got into a target (T60 school) and was shut out from reaches (T20s). His school is actually #8 for his major, but he initially wanted something even better.

It's fine.


I doubt “top stats” kids are shut out of schools ranked 30-60, unless the admission rates are less than 20%

People complaining mean they were shut out of reach schools and yes that happens, that’s why they are reaches with less than 10-15% acceptance rates.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Could we stick with original question please?

Was your strong applicant shut out?

(I know all the rest about high grades/scores not being enough, legacy and money talking, private school being viewed as a privilege etc, etc, etc). That has ALL been hashed to death).

Was your kid shut out?

Thank you.


Yes, mine was; however, DC applied as a music major, which has an even lower admit rate than the overall admit rates at the schools. DC was waitlisted at one T40 school.



Where else did they apply? Interested in music


They did not apply to any conservatories — they wanted to double major, so they applied to Carnegie Mellon, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, and schools of that caliber. They got auditions at some of them, but were ultimately rejected (many of these schools choose just a few in each instrument, and if you have a popular instrument (i.e. is a soprano vocalist), then it’s even more competitive; this year, I think oboists were highly sought after). Northwestern, for example, has 400 undergrads in the entire school of music (i.e. across all instruments), so you can imagine how competitive it is. The only music schools my DC got into were their in-state music schools. This whole process made them rethink their future in music (the audition process is grueling in terms of travel, preparation, and missing school for he auditions when you kid is taking a million AP courses).


Thanks. Good luck to your child


Yes at a place like northwestern the oboe studio (and bassoon studio) will have approximately 10-12 undergrads total at most and another 5-7 grad students at Most! That means 3-4 slots for freshman at most, unless someone is beyond extremely talented. So they obviously get way more nightly qualified students than spaces auditioning. With only 2 bands and 1 orchestra (chamber orchestra rarely uses the winds/brass) there are only slots for 4-5 students in each group, and even that means not playing in every piece. So you not want them taking more students—or you kid won’t get playing opportunities. But then again it is a good introduction to the real music world after graduation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:is Top 40 a thing?

I see schools like URochester, UWisconsin, UTexas Austin, bunch of 2nd tier UC schools.


If you can't get into one of these schools, you are not really competitive.

If you get in, you can proudly say I got in to a T40 school.

You should see the qualifications of some of these kids you are calling “not competitive”.

”Top 40” is a manufactured ranking based on faulty criteria.

There are a lot of kids who worked extremely hard that are feeling “less than” because of the flawed perception that admission to certain schools is the only measure of success.


Yes! My kid sat took MVC (calc 3) and organic Chem at URochester with other freshman and over 50% of the students had ALReady taken those courses in GS, just did not have a way to get college credit. So they were retaking them. Some really smart kids at those schools—I’d say an avg of 89% in organic Chem tests (so no curve) is a group of really really smart people. Just as smart as those at ivies/t20 schools, just didn’t win lottery for those schools
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:is Top 40 a thing?

I see schools like URochester, UWisconsin, UTexas Austin, bunch of 2nd tier UC schools.


If you can't get into one of these schools, you are not really competitive.

If you get in, you can proudly say I got in to a T40 school.

You should see the qualifications of some of these kids you are calling “not competitive”.

”Top 40” is a manufactured ranking based on faulty criteria.

There are a lot of kids who worked extremely hard that are feeling “less than” because of the flawed perception that admission to certain schools is the only measure of success.


Yes! My kid sat took MVC (calc 3) and organic Chem at URochester with other freshman and over 50% of the students had ALReady taken those courses in GS, just did not have a way to get college credit. So they were retaking them. Some really smart kids at those schools—I’d say an avg of 89% in organic Chem tests (so no curve) is a group of really really smart people. Just as smart as those at ivies/t20 schools, just didn’t win lottery for those schools


I can totally see that. Being awesome at math and science not necessarily correlated with being “pointy” and interesting and unique and curated, as required by Ivies. These kids are just as smart, maybe even smarter, just don’t have the bells and whistles
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My top stats kid is going to a USNWR top 50 school (in the 40s). Didn’t you know 50 is the new 30?


Which "top 40" schools ? Top 40 National Universities ? Top 40 Nat'l Universities & LACs combined ? Top 40 business schools or engineering schools, etc. ? Top 40 schools with the lowest rates of admission ?


I am the previous poster. Top 40s national university. Here are the schools in the 40s and it is one of these: Boston University, U Illinois, William & Mary, Brandeis, Case Western, Georgia Tech, Northeastern, Tulane, Ohio State, University of Georgia.


Similar here. Unhooked UMC high stats kid, not tippy top attending T40 national school (not CS/Engineering): CMU, Emory, UNC, UVA, URochester, Brandeis, W&M + W&L, Grinnell
So W&M? Because Emory, CMU, and UVA are not T40.


+1

Anonymous
High stats kid

Rejected:
two T10
T20
T3 SLAC

WL:
two T25
T20 SLAC

Accepted
T25
T25 via alternative pathway
T40
three outside of T40

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid got locked out despite what looked like the whole package (stats / EC / class rigor). Not sure if the essays or recommendations were off. Kids getting in from the same school with less rigor and lower scores seem to generally have some hook (i.e. sports, URM, etc.). My kid was truthful on their application and wrote all their own essays. Will never know if something was off on the application or if just too many kids wth similar profile.



Are you implying that some kids got in who didn't write their own essays??


NP but I’m not implying that, I will say outright that some kids who got in didn’t write their own essays.


Of course not! They would not have been admitted with their own essays, and their parents know that!



A friend just casually mentioned they spent $5k on a college consultant. Part of their duties was to “help with essays.” I was shocked but guess I shouldn’t have been!


There are levels of "essay help". Our CC helped with brainstorming and editing. But they DID NOT write the essays. Our kids had to do the work themselves. I read essays from previous clients who obviously were amazing writers (my kids were good but not amazing) and the college counselor assured me that it was those kid's true voices. But it was helpful having someone help brainstorming so you use your own voice to write about your life the best you can. A good counselor only helps, but the kid does all the work.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid got locked out despite what looked like the whole package (stats / EC / class rigor). Not sure if the essays or recommendations were off. Kids getting in from the same school with less rigor and lower scores seem to generally have some hook (i.e. sports, URM, etc.). My kid was truthful on their application and wrote all their own essays. Will never know if something was off on the application or if just too many kids wth similar profile.



Are you implying that some kids got in who didn't write their own essays??


NP but I’m not implying that, I will say outright that some kids who got in didn’t write their own essays.


Of course not! They would not have been admitted with their own essays, and their parents know that!



A friend just casually mentioned they spent $5k on a college consultant. Part of their duties was to “help with essays.” I was shocked but guess I shouldn’t have been!


I should change professions.


Our College counselor was ~$5K for all of HS. We only used from Jan junior year onwards and still had 30+ hours of meetings with the CC. Had we used them from 9th grade onward, it would have been easily 100+ hours of use.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dont know if any are "Top 40" (number seems arbitrary).
Rejected: Harvard, Penn
Waitlist: NEU, UVA
Accepted: WM, CWRU, Lehigh, BU, UMD, UMN, OSU, Pitt


Poster above. AMAZINGLY collegevine.com was exactly right in predicting DS's outcomes. Rejected from reaches, waitlisted at 2 of 3 hard targets and accepted to 1 hard target and all targets and safeties.


Amazingly, if you do your list right, your kid will likely get rejected at their reaches, in at most of their targets and all of their safeties.

The people who end up "upset come April" are those that think their snowflake will actually get into all their reaches with single digit acceptance rates---fact is majority will not get into any no matter what your stats. You must build your reach, target and safety/likely list from acceptance rates. If you do that, your kid will have a good list of acceptances come April.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one is really applying to 40-50 schools, are they??


Of course not. OP's question is poorly phrased, but we know what is meant.


But it's silly, because if all they applied to were schools with single digit acceptance rates, yes of course their kid is likely to get rejected at all of them. But there are many schools in the 30-50 range with 20-30% acceptance rates where most kids "with stats for T20 schools" can get accepted if they show demonstrated interest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dont know if any are "Top 40" (number seems arbitrary).
Rejected: Harvard, Penn
Waitlist: NEU, UVA
Accepted: WM, CWRU, Lehigh, BU, UMD, UMN, OSU, Pitt


Poster above. AMAZINGLY collegevine.com was exactly right in predicting DS's outcomes. Rejected from reaches, waitlisted at 2 of 3 hard targets and accepted to 1 hard target and all targets and safeties.


Amazingly, if you do your list right, your kid will likely get rejected at their reaches, in at most of their targets and all of their safeties.

The people who end up "upset come April" are those that think their snowflake will actually get into all their reaches with single digit acceptance rates---fact is majority will not get into any no matter what your stats. You must build your reach, target and safety/likely list from acceptance rates. If you do that, your kid will have a good list of acceptances come April.



+1 people completely lose sight of this. Focus on finding safeties you can love because there's a good chance you'll end up choosing among those. DD had four safeties and people asked why bother with multiple safeties. Because then you have choices and preferences can evolve over senior year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My oldest is only 14 and not even in high school yet but I have heard of kids who seem perfect on paper get shut out.

I actually started a thread yesterday about parent involvement in starting non profits and businesses for their kids to look good for college admissions. I am not confident my kids can get admitted into a top college in today’s climate. It seems you need something unique and special. My kids are smart, play multiple sports well and are just your typical well redounded UMC kid. I’m still undecided if I want to jump through hoops to help my children have impressive sounding fluff for their college admissions or just let them be (likely not do anything especially impressive besides typical school clubs and sports).


The latter! Being a teenager is hard enough without having to start a non-profit and take 10 AP courses. Do people hear themselves? Our kids are not vessels for our own ambitions and status anxieties.

FWIW - we have one kid in college and two more in MS. They're gonna grow up normally, do what they want outside the classroom and they'll probably go to a state school.

+1000 for letting your kids select their own ECs in HS. Let your kid be themselves and do NOT force them to do activities just because "it will look good for college applications". Make similar choices for course selection as well. My own kid did not do any actives at school except Band. Instead they focused on 20+ hours of dance/week as that's what they loved. They also choose to take only 4 APs each during Junior and Senior year, with most of them being STEM focused. Sure they could have done APUSH or APEng (whatever its called). But that would have required 10-15 hours of extra homework to get an A/A- and would have made them miserable. Ultimately, my kid got into all reaches and safeties, got rejected at ED1(T10), accepted 1st year abroad at one reach and WL at another reach. My kid ultimately picked between 2 schools ranked 30-45 and BOTH would NOT give any credit for APUSH/AP Eng. So my kid was extremely happy they had not taken those, as the only reason they considered it was to get college credit. Ironically, they would have still had to taken the core curriculum at their respective university so those classes would not matter. Given my kid had covid as their middle two years of HS, their mental health mattered much more----not taking those allowed them to still get 4-5 hours of sleep each night and have a social life on weekends. Had we forced them to take those APs, my kid would have hated us. So we let them choose. And it worked out for the best.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious, based on another post that brought up the point that the posts on this board seemed to make a complete shift from "my high stats kid is getting shut out" to
"Should my kid attend Penn or Vanderbilt?" (or Tulane or Case? or...).

With all admits in, did your strong stats kid get shut out of all top 40 or top 50 colleges and universities?
I'm wondering what actually happened in the end.
I'm the parent of a junior.




One important question to ask about s choice of major.

CS is so competitive, for example, that, for most students, simply applying as a CS major or a premed is a sign of idiocy. The kid might have an an SAT score of 1580 but lacks the commonsense God gave a penguin.

The students who are born to be CS majors may have no choice; they are what they are.

But parents pushing the kids who don’t do this for fun to apply to top U.S. schools as CS majors might as well be hanging “I’m a dutiful drone” signs on the kids’ necks.

The path to success lies through figuring how to apply as a history or English major and figure out how to acquire the skills and student jobs needed to get a job with a humanities major, or how to sneak around course enrollment limits and pair the history major with a surprise second major in CS or actuarial math.


FYI---at many T30 schools, there is no "sneaking around course enrollment limits with a surprise second major in CS". It simply cannot be done. That is why if you truly are interested in CS you must apply as a CS major.
Or take the smarter path and find a school in the 30-60 range where majors are not Direct admit and anyone can self select a major. IMO, that is a much smarter path. All 3 of my kids did this---they wanted to be at schools where they didn't have to compete to get into their desired majors and could add minors/double majors without jumping thru hoops---already did the competition to get into college, but college does not have to continue to be so stressfull/competitive to major in what you want. For $80K/year, My kid should be able to major in whatever they want (with in the constraints of you need to take the 2-3 intro CS or whatever major courses and get a C/C+ or better in order to major).
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: