Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, I agree - it seems like they wanted to signal that the recommendations matter for the early part of the process, but I just don't see how that is possible given the GPA threshold criteria. Like, it can't be both. Unless there's a circumstance where they decide that a kid who'd qualify by GPA doesn't make it to interview because of a bad rec. Or vice versa. But... I just don't see it actually happening that way.
It does makes sense to use the recs to help assess/score within the kids who make the GPA cutoff.
Considering grades and letters of rec before interviewing ultimately gives more weight to the interview & essays. If they consider GPA (10 points) and recs (30 points) before interviewing & interview only students with the highest combined scores, the result is likely to be very narrow range. As a result, most of the 40 possible points will not matter in the end because everyone in the interview pool also has those points. For example, if the range for interviewees is 35-40/40 points, 35 of the points are irrelevant for comparing the students, only the last 5 will ultimately matter. So while the highest possible score is nominally 100, in reality it is 65, almost all of which will be determined by the essay & interview.