School Calendar 2023-2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like blue but with some amendments?
Did they approve for 3 years?

Amended blue for 3 years was approved but watch out on years 2 and 3. They may make some tweaks including for Super Tuesday if needed.

Amended how?

TBD but they’re not set in stone. They discussed that they could make some changes if needed.

Oh sorry it’s posted here in the comments somewhere - the amended blue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of frustrating as teachers to be done Wednesday but have to be there through the end of week.

I love you teachers. But dang. Every discussion revolves around you all. And you have that Wednesday because they aren’t bringing you back on a Friday in august.

[Anonymous]

Minus the early start it’s not a horrible calendar for me! I am excited about the longer spring break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Reid would like a 3-year calendar approved tonight, so my approval rating of her just plummeted.

IDK. There is no perfect calendar that will make everyone happy and adopting a calemder is a time suck that makes everyone angry. There is something to be said for no having to deal with in for the next 2 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of frustrating as teachers to be done Wednesday but have to be there through the end of week.

I love you teachers. But dang. Every discussion revolves around you all. And you have that Wednesday because they aren’t bringing you back on a Friday in august.

I would have preferred that Friday in August. It has been one of the few unencumbered days I can use to prepare for the start of school.

[Anonymous]

I’m not against a 3 year calendar - it is so frustrating to go thru this every year. And they wait entirely too long to approve IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of frustrating as teachers to be done Wednesday but have to be there through the end of week.

I love you teachers. But dang. Every discussion revolves around you all. And you have that Wednesday because they aren’t bringing you back on a Friday in august.

It seems to me there are plenty of comments throughout threads about cheap flights, availability of family vacation time, and the difficulty of finding daycare or signing up for camps to balance things out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Reid would like a 3-year calendar approved tonight, so my approval rating of her just plummeted.

IDK. There is no perfect calendar that will make everyone happy and adopting a calemder is a time suck that makes everyone angry. There is something to be said for no having to deal with in for the next 2 years.

Didn’t the majority of the community say they preferred a multi-year calendar approval?

[Anonymous]

While they adopted the amended undercover/secret (according to LJ Cohen) blue calendar for 3 years, I think the only things you might want to count on for 24-25 and 25-26 is the start date was my own personal takeaway from their conversation.

What did come up in discussion was that the calendar is an operational function of FCPS and should not be under the umbrella of the SB. (Finally! Something I agree with them on!)

Many of the SB members that voted no and fell on their swords last night because of it said it was because they met and heard from so many families/teachers in their district that the original blue calendar worked best, that is what they were supposed to be voting for, #of 5 consecutive weeks were now lessened, teacher workdays blah blah blah, but we have to walk away with a calendar tonight. Despite this—they still voted no. No compromise. A lot of cutting off of their nose to spite their face type of stuff.

Agree that Meren is not my fave…at all…but last night she either wanted to get to bed or she realized she needed to flip in order to flip in order to get the number of votes needed to approve a calendar in February.

[Anonymous]

I totally agree with 7:44.

[Anonymous]

What is really behind why the folks that voted no oppose the updated version? Is it really just about that stupid extra day in June for teachers?

It’s obviously better since it gets us out earlier, drops the observance day for Veterans Day which was not needed and fixes that dumb 2 day week after spring break in the earlier version. And complaining about “5 day weeks” was the only way for parents to voice disagreement in the survey with the new religious holidays. No one was willing to say the obvious - a big part of the results on “5 day weeks” is a proxy for discontent with the new religious holidays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of frustrating as teachers to be done Wednesday but have to be there through the end of week.

I love you teachers. But dang. Every discussion revolves around you all. And you have that Wednesday because they aren’t bringing you back on a Friday in august.

It seems to me there are plenty of comments throughout threads about cheap flights, availability of family vacation time, and the difficulty of finding daycare or signing up for camps to balance things out.

I'm talking about the school board meeting. Many members main concern ( and it is understandable) was what the teachers wanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of frustrating as teachers to be done Wednesday but have to be there through the end of week.

I love you teachers. But dang. Every discussion revolves around you all. And you have that Wednesday because they aren’t bringing you back on a Friday in august.

Don’t try to blame this sh*t on us.

[Anonymous]

What is "Religious and Cultural Observance(s) - Evening Only" mean? Does it affect after school or anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While they adopted the amended undercover/secret (according to LJ Cohen) blue calendar for 3 years, I think the only things you might want to count on for 24-25 and 25-26 is the start date was my own personal takeaway from their conversation.

What did come up in discussion was that the calendar is an operational function of FCPS and should not be under the umbrella of the SB. (Finally! Something I agree with them on!)

Many of the SB members that voted no and fell on their swords last night because of it said it was because they met and heard from so many families/teachers in their district that the original blue calendar worked best, that is what they were supposed to be voting for, #of 5 consecutive weeks were now lessened, teacher workdays blah blah blah, but we have to walk away with a calendar tonight. Despite this—they still voted no. No compromise. A lot of cutting off of their nose to spite their face type of stuff.

Agree that Meren is not my fave…at all…but last night she either wanted to get to bed or she realized she needed to flip in order to flip in order to get the number of votes needed to approve a calendar in February.

Is it possible that people liked the original blue calendar compared to the other colors - because this amended blue calendar wasn't put forward as an option? Saying "my constituents like the original one so I can't vote for this one" when they haven't talked to constituents about this one and they may like it better is a pretty weak argument.

So is 23/24 set in stone and they may revisit out years? Or are they talking about additional discussion about 23/24?