Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Go to your local library and pick out novels. Select some classics. Why are some of you parents relying entirely on schools to do that? Prior to Christmas break, I had several classics ready. The school didn’t ask that I do that. Take responsibility instead of pouting and complaining.
It’s one thing to provide classics to your kids—I do, although they definitely prefer the YA stuff. What I’d like to see is a teacher guiding them through more difficult works of literature, leading discussions and assigning written analyses. They’re not going to do all that for me.
When my child’s public middle school assigned no books to read in 7th grade, I did two things: had my kids read outside of school and then moved all the younger kids to private school, where books are assigned in middle school. I imagine that other PPs whose kids weren’t assigned books did something similar.
But that only solved the problem for my own children who have parents that speak English, that can assign books outside, and that are able to afford private school. What about the kids who don’t? Why are you and other PPs okay with just writing off their educations? It is mind boggling to me that so many people in this thread are perfectly okay with the vast educational inequality here. Surely we can all agree that it’s not great that kids lucky enough to attend private schools or certain public schools learn the critical skills associated with reading a book (and excerpts do not teach the same skills) while other kids don’t get to access those skills. Why is this a remotely controversial position? I feel like posters are trying to be willfully blind about just how behind some public schools are, and it doesn’t make sense.