Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tmz.com/2025/02/06/taylor-swift-blake-lively-manipulated-lawsuit-justin-baldoni-meeting-legal-war/

Knew it. Taylor not worried because her intentions were to help hype up a friend.

https://x.com/TMZ/status/1887580449939333382?t=1ZXlqJ_lhVZP7BUDb89BLA&s=19

the source says, "Taylor is also learning Blake has been inappropriately leveraging her name for a long time, like telling a young actress that Taylor 'cast her,' which simply did not happen.

This friendship is done.

It might not be according to another source close to the situation...

"Another source close to the situation says Taylor was pissed about the extent to which she was involved, and specifically she was angry about the 'dragons' remark … but Blake has since apologized, they had a good cry and hugged it out."

Link?

Tmz article. You have to scroll. It wouldn't work on mobile so I had to force it to full page.
https://www.tmz.com/2025/02/06/taylor-swift-blake-lively-manipulated-lawsuit-justin-baldoni-meeting-legal-war/

[Anonymous]

Taylor is stupid if she still trusts blake.

[Anonymous]

Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

[Anonymous]

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/taylor-swift-had-no-creative-involvement-in-it-ends-with-us/?taid=67a5331788e6430001b652a3&utm_campaign=true_anthem_usweekly&utm_content=manual&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

New article! If TMZ updates their post with a denial then I will change my mind but I think this is tree. She tends spam different outlets like this. Now it says Taylor and Blake are still friends but also says “Dragging Taylor into it is unnecessary and misrepresents what really happened.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

She can add plaintiffs. That's what joiners are for. Are they claiming Slate was the other party that complained? I could have sworn it was said a another lower rank actress did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

That guy should talk to her lawyer, because he said he was considering adding a defendant, not an additional plaintiff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

She can add plaintiffs. That's what joiners are for. Are they claiming Slate was the other party that complained? I could have sworn it was said an another lower rank actress did.

There has been no other complaints identified, by Slate or anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

That guy should talk to her lawyer, because he said he was considering adding a defendant, not an additional plaintiff.

Could he be hiding that info if he wanted to? Not playing contrarian actually asking if that is a thing that could happen.

[Anonymous]

I bet Blake will not be in Taylor’s Super Bowl box this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

That guy should talk to her lawyer, because he said he was considering adding a defendant, not an additional plaintiff.

Could he be hiding that info if he wanted to? Not playing contrarian actually asking if that is a thing that could happen.

Generally you don’t say things to a judge that aren’t true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

That guy should talk to her lawyer, because he said he was considering adding a defendant, not an additional plaintiff.

Could he be hiding that info if he wanted to? Not playing contrarian actually asking if that is a thing that could happen.

Makes little sense to hide it from the judge. He could've kept it vauge and said he was adding more parties without specifically saying defendants

[Anonymous]

Looks like Taylor is focusing on other friendships.

https://pagesix.com/2025/02/06/celebrity-news/inside-taylor-swift-and-selena-gomezs-giggly-pre-super-bowl-girls-night-out/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some dude on TikTok claims he got tea that Blake wants to add Jenny Slate as a plaintiff. But that’s incorrect because Blake won’t be able to add plaintiffs, correct?

That guy should talk to her lawyer, because he said he was considering adding a defendant, not an additional plaintiff.

Could he be hiding that info if he wanted to? Not playing contrarian actually asking if that is a thing that could happen.

Makes little sense to hide it from the judge. He could've kept it vauge and said he was adding more parties without specifically saying defendants

Got it. Thanks, love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet Blake will not be in Taylor’s Super Bowl box this year.

Safe bet!

[Anonymous]

Taylor must be absolutely fuming if she’s releasing PR stories about her and Selena going out and I am here for it.