Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

Just following the GOP playbook - and I say that it is about time.

You mean the established Clinton playbook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

Oh, I forgot to say that the idea of either party hand-choosing a candidate for the people of a state is appalling and should alarm anyone who believes in fairness of our elections.

But this is very similar to what Clinton did to Sanders - what the DNC allowed to happen.

They can't "hand pick" a candidate. If Moore wants to continue running, there is nothing they can do. And they also could not stop multiple would be write in candidates. However right in campaigns tend to be expensive (you need to let everyone know to vote for you, you won't get ANY votes from people seeing your name on the ballot) and they can decide whom, if any, to contribute party funds to.

What reform would prevent a party from deciding what to do with its funds?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

Just following the GOP playbook - and I say that it is about time.

You mean the established Clinton playbook.

I know. Clinton had the gall to quote Trump's own words against him.

[Anonymous]

Well, apparently Gloria Allred has found someone else. Guess that makes it true?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When was the most recent allegation?

When the WaPo published the story and WSJ followed up. But stay tuned. There’s more to come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The girls were legal. Furthermore, someone who is concerned enough to actually ask the parent (customary then) does not square with a man who would deliberately abuse a girl behind her mother's back.

Yet he denied ALL their statements, and many of his defenders have attacked one of the "legal" girls for being a Dem.

There are currently two defenses going around - A. Its all lies B. Well its true he dated teenagers, legally, but the molesting the 14 year old thing is false.

These stories are mutually contradictory. They detract from each other.

Not just a Dem. A dem with ties to Biden and Clinton, who also works on Jones' campaign AND is an activist to boot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently Gloria Allred has found someone else. Guess that makes it true?????

If it's Allred, I'd say it's bought and paid for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The girls were legal. Furthermore, someone who is concerned enough to actually ask the parent (customary then) does not square with a man who would deliberately abuse a girl behind her mother's back.

Yet he denied ALL their statements, and many of his defenders have attacked one of the "legal" girls for being a Dem.

There are currently two defenses going around - A. Its all lies B. Well its true he dated teenagers, legally, but the molesting the 14 year old thing is false.

These stories are mutually contradictory. They detract from each other.

Not just a Dem. A dem with ties to Biden and Clinton, who also works on Jones' campaign AND is an activist to boot

Yeah, I mean I can't imagine that an early experience with Moore could influence a young woman to become a feminist and activist.

But so are you saying they are all lies? If so why go on about them being "legal". And if she is an activist trying to bring him down, why not say he touched her - why say it went no further than kissing, and leave the worse allegations to someone "unreliable"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

Oh, I forgot to say that the idea of either party hand-choosing a candidate for the people of a state is appalling and should alarm anyone who believes in fairness of our elections.

But this is very similar to what Clinton did to Sanders - what the DNC allowed to happen.

They can't "hand pick" a candidate. If Moore wants to continue running, there is nothing they can do. And they also could not stop multiple would be write in candidates. However right in campaigns tend to be expensive (you need to let everyone know to vote for you, you won't get ANY votes from people seeing your name on the ballot) and they can decide whom, if any, to contribute party funds to.

What reform would prevent a party from deciding what to do with its funds?

Seems McConnell says he can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:McConnell knows there are more under-aged girls who were molested by Moore. Why do you think they pushed for Luther Strange so hard?

The GOP isn't dumb. They have plenty of money and opposition researchers to vet candidates.

I have heard this also from a friend on the Hill - that the GOP knows more about this issue than is publicly known.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McConnell knows there are more under-aged girls who were molested by Moore. Why do you think they pushed for Luther Strange so hard?

The GOP isn't dumb. They have plenty of money and opposition researchers to vet candidates.

I have heard this also from a friend on the Hill - that the GOP knows more about this issue than is publicly known.

Of course they do....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

So you're having difficulty reconcile the fact that Moore is a pedophile? Or you think all four public victims are lying? Or what he did was totally okay and you'd be fine with your 14 year old going on date with a 32 year old? I mean, which is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McConnell knows there are more under-aged girls who were molested by Moore. Why do you think they pushed for Luther Strange so hard?

The GOP isn't dumb. They have plenty of money and opposition researchers to vet candidates.

I have heard this also from a friend on the Hill - that the GOP knows more about this issue than is publicly known.

They pushed for Luther Strange because he's an establishment candidate they can control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IF this works, the MSM and DNC have their template for the next few years: SMEAR and CHARACTER ASSASINATION CAMPAIGNS galore against any opponent, truthful or not.

What does the DNC have to do with this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McConnell knows there are more under-aged girls who were molested by Moore. Why do you think they pushed for Luther Strange so hard?

The GOP isn't dumb. They have plenty of money and opposition researchers to vet candidates.

I have heard this also from a friend on the Hill - that the GOP knows more about this issue than is publicly known.

I doubt it stops at molestation.