Trump can’t pay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to that tweet, Trump has two loans against Trump Tower NY.

He is a walking national security risk.

He is a walking threat to Joe Biden and democrats don’t want him running for president. Everyone can see through this nonsense. People are going to vote for him, and he’s going to win. Our country is a nightmare under Barack Obama’s third term.

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley believes the financial predicament is a form of “mob justice” that could ultimately find its way to the Supreme Court:

His position is in order to get any other judge to look at what I’ve done to you, you’ve got to come up with basically a half a billion dollars just to appeal. It’s like a judge saying, “I’m going to take your house away, but you can appeal my decision. You just have to sell your house in order to do it.” …[M]any people look at this as a type of almost mob justice.

And this could end up going beyond the New York system. They [Trump’s team] could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions, for example, on punitive damages, and so that points damages can become so high they deny someone due process of law. This is falling into that extreme category, in my view. I find it appalling.

“It shocks the conscience that you have to pony up this type of money just to get someone to look at what you believe, and I believe, is an excessive ruling by this judge,” Turley concluded.

Does Letitia think Hunter Biden’s artworks are worth a few million dollars?

[Anonymous]

Grant Cardone is less than pleased with the ruling against former President Donald Trump, in which Trump has been ordered to pay $355 million in penalties plus interest. If Trump were to pay the full amount of the penalty today, it would cost him roughly $450 million.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Grant Cardone said, "Dear Cardone Capital team, Immediately discontinue ALL underwriting on New York City real estate. The risk outweigh the opportunities at this time. Recent political decisions will continue to deteriorate price and benefit states that don't have these challenges. Focus on Texas & Florida."

Cardone's comments echo what Kevin O'Leary said in a recent interview, calling the decision to fine Trump "unjust," "appalling," and "Un-American."

“That fact that he was found guilty, you might as well find guilty every real estate developer on Earth,” O'Leary said.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul has tried to calm the fear that has come from the ruling, insisting that "law-abiding, rule-following New Yorkers who are businesspeople have nothing to worry about because they're very different from Donald Trump and his behavior," according to the New York Post.

O'Leary believes that the ruling against Trump will likely be overturned on appeal, but the consequences of the decision may hurt New York going forward.



https://finance.yahoo.com/news/grant-cardone-team-immediately-discontinue-173431156.html

Democrats are terrified of Trump winning in November. They are coordinating a freak show through the courts to prevent a free and fair election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Also for the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts

Good! Those two organizations molested thousands of people and ruined lives!

Totally, but they ended it! I just want to know why that’s okay. Shouldn’t victims still benefit? Why was it only one year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Also for the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts

Good! Those two organizations molested thousands of people and ruined lives!

Totally, but they ended it! I just want to know why that’s okay. Shouldn’t victims still benefit? Why was it only one year?

I’m going to assume lobbying by those organizations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM just realized it didn’t have enough Trump threads!

A lot of people aren’t used to having ex-presidents with such long records of criminality, so you must excuse them. I mean usually a president is someone you could look to for inspiration. In this case, you got this spray-tanned piece of sht who has lied about just about everything and cheated anyone who has ever been close, so you know, right? Makes sense to have a few posts.

Somebody in the New York legislature passed a bill with Trump in mind, said for one year the statute of limitations on long ago sexual assault will be waived. Then suddenly E Jean refiles. It seems like they got the target first and then they manipulated or redefined the laws to make sure that he could be prosecuted.

When in doubt always go for conspiratorial thinking first, I see.

A new law in New York is behind the civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, and survivors hope the spotlight put on it by this week’s verdict against the former president means more people might use it.
The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place, even if it’s outside the statute of limitations. But that window expires in six months.

The law has a one-year window through late November.


Within hours of the law going into effect in late November, Carroll filed a battery and defamation civil suit against Trump.

The Adult Survivors Act Has Expired In New York State

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaswigdor/2023/12/05/the-adult-survivors-act-has-expired-in-new-york-state/?sh=48cb75f14ce5

With the expiration of the law, individuals can no longer file new lawsuits under the provisions of the Adult Survivors Act.

How is this a conspiracy if it’s true?

Why has NY let it expire? Why not just keep it in place?

Also for the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts

Good! Those two organizations molested thousands of people and ruined lives!

Totally, but they ended it! I just want to know why that’s okay. Shouldn’t victims still benefit? Why was it only one year?

I’m going to assume lobbying by those organizations.

Wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that tweet, Trump has two loans against Trump Tower NY.

He is a walking national security risk.

He is a walking threat to Joe Biden and democrats don’t want him running for president. Everyone can see through this nonsense. People are going to vote for him, and he’s going to win. Our country is a nightmare under Barack Obama’s third term.

Not really. Trump will have to get the Haley voters to come home in big numbers to have a chance, and that's not going to happen. Anyway, we'll see if the corrupt judiciary he's put in place come to his rescue once again to save him from his criminality, but the clock is ticking. Hopefully, they'll finally let justice prevail by punishing him for his crimes and corruption.

[Anonymous]

Fraud is fraud.

It just shows how corrupt real estate is, if "Mr. Wonderful" is complaining so loudly. If he is a crook throw the book at him as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that tweet, Trump has two loans against Trump Tower NY.

He is a walking national security risk.

He is a walking threat to Joe Biden and democrats don’t want him running for president. Everyone can see through this nonsense. People are going to vote for him, and he’s going to win. Our country is a nightmare under Barack Obama’s third term.

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley believes the financial predicament is a form of “mob justice” that could ultimately find its way to the Supreme Court:

His position is in order to get any other judge to look at what I’ve done to you, you’ve got to come up with basically a half a billion dollars just to appeal. It’s like a judge saying, “I’m going to take your house away, but you can appeal my decision. You just have to sell your house in order to do it.” …[M]any people look at this as a type of almost mob justice.

And this could end up going beyond the New York system. They [Trump’s team] could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions, for example, on punitive damages, and so that points damages can become so high they deny someone due process of law. This is falling into that extreme category, in my view. I find it appalling.

“It shocks the conscience that you have to pony up this type of money just to get someone to look at what you believe, and I believe, is an excessive ruling by this judge,” Turley concluded.

Does Letitia think Hunter Biden’s artworks are worth a few million dollars?

Biden already beat Trump. He will do it again. Trump is a loser. He committed crimes and should face trials. Trump is also a huge pu**y. If he did the crime, he should face the consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that tweet, Trump has two loans against Trump Tower NY.

He is a walking national security risk.

He is a walking threat to Joe Biden and democrats don’t want him running for president. Everyone can see through this nonsense. People are going to vote for him, and he’s going to win. Our country is a nightmare under Barack Obama’s third term.

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley believes the financial predicament is a form of “mob justice” that could ultimately find its way to the Supreme Court:

His position is in order to get any other judge to look at what I’ve done to you, you’ve got to come up with basically a half a billion dollars just to appeal. It’s like a judge saying, “I’m going to take your house away, but you can appeal my decision. You just have to sell your house in order to do it.” …[M]any people look at this as a type of almost mob justice.

And this could end up going beyond the New York system. They [Trump’s team] could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions, for example, on punitive damages, and so that points damages can become so high they deny someone due process of law. This is falling into that extreme category, in my view. I find it appalling.

“It shocks the conscience that you have to pony up this type of money just to get someone to look at what you believe, and I believe, is an excessive ruling by this judge,” Turley concluded.

Does Letitia think Hunter Biden’s artworks are worth a few million dollars?

Biden already beat Trump. He will do it again. Trump is a loser. He committed crimes and should face trials. Trump is also a huge pu**y. If he did the crime, he should face the consequences.

But it’s so much easier to blame the DEEP STATE! Seriously, Trump is broke, he’s a loser and will keep losing. I’m thrilled to see GOP stay on the Titanic and go down with him. So. Much. Losing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that tweet, Trump has two loans against Trump Tower NY.

He is a walking national security risk.

He is a walking threat to Joe Biden and democrats don’t want him running for president. Everyone can see through this nonsense. People are going to vote for him, and he’s going to win. Our country is a nightmare under Barack Obama’s third term.

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley believes the financial predicament is a form of “mob justice” that could ultimately find its way to the Supreme Court:

His position is in order to get any other judge to look at what I’ve done to you, you’ve got to come up with basically a half a billion dollars just to appeal. It’s like a judge saying, “I’m going to take your house away, but you can appeal my decision. You just have to sell your house in order to do it.” …[M]any people look at this as a type of almost mob justice.

And this could end up going beyond the New York system. They [Trump’s team] could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions, for example, on punitive damages, and so that points damages can become so high they deny someone due process of law. This is falling into that extreme category, in my view. I find it appalling.

“It shocks the conscience that you have to pony up this type of money just to get someone to look at what you believe, and I believe, is an excessive ruling by this judge,” Turley concluded.

Does Letitia think Hunter Biden’s artworks are worth a few million dollars?

I remember when you guys claimed these cases were a democratic op to boost trump over desantis.

[Anonymous]

I don't know anything about the law. For those familiar with it, is Trump likely to get the 450 million judgement lowered?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would be funny to watch a reality TV series where Trump went broke because of all his properties being seized and he had to shack up in a trailer with one of his supporters in the hills of Kentucky. The show would basically document his obvious disdain for the lifestyle and highlight his narcissism. Basically he’d have to like chop wood in the winter, or touch cow udders for milk, and complain like the germaphobe he is on camera the whole time. Netflix get on this!

Spin-off from the Paris Hilton-Nicole Richie show! Love it!

[Anonymous]

I love it when MAGA people post bitter screeds about the injustice of it all, but don't want to dig into their wallets anymore to give Trump a dime.

Hypocrites.

You should be donating every penny of your money to this worthy cause! Until you do, don't you dare post your two-faced drivel on here.

Every time you post, we'll ask you if you gave Trump your life savings. AS YOU SHOULD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know anything about the law. For those familiar with it, is Trump likely to get the 450 million judgement lowered?

Why? Can he go back in time and not do all the cheating and lying? Consequence time for the con artist.

[Anonymous]

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley

Yeah, stopped reading right there.