Why do schools narrow endowment in the way colleges do in the US to just the managed $$? Stanford, for example, could sell housing or buildings not even on its main campus for massive $$. Asset base provides a more accurate view. |
+1 |
Why is Duke included in this |
|
Only:
Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT UPenn CalTech Duke |
| good luck full paying for degrees like english communication at whatever schools |
Most kids from aren’t UMC families aren’t going to elite schools to study that. Only the rich kids go to elite schools for that, and the few regular kids who study it probably try their hand at a few pre-professional pathways as well |
Take out Duke and switch Penn to Wharton, then good list |
|
Any school my child got into and wanted to go to. College is important. I went to a top college. My wife went to a top college. We see tons of people personally and professionally who didn’t. I hope my children get into great schools, but if they don’t, I still want them going to college.
|
| Did any of the people posting this go to these schools? What sort of deluded thinking is this? Your kid can only go to these 7 or so schools? So, no college is better than paying for a college that isn’t an Ivy? Insane. |
Maybe they’ll only go to schools that offer merit? That’s a PRETTY big difference between Yale and Gettysburg. |
You could use a few “English communication” classes yourself |
| Off the top of my head, the top 30 or so LACs and the top 20 or so national universities. But what my kid had to say could potentially change that. |
Moneybags |
From what I've seen over my lifetime, a better ROI is likely when the fit is right. |
| Some schools, that aren’t even in the top 20, have many full pay students. There must be a reason! |