Latest CDC number 1 in 36 children diagnosed with autism

[Anonymous]

I went to school w so many asd kids who just weren’t dx. It’s not actually increasing just more dxd

[Anonymous]

Per the above

https://www.statnews.com/2023/03/23/autism-epidemic-cdc-numbers/

[Anonymous]

Yes, the numbers of autism, the incidence, is actually increasing.

https://www.science.org/content/article/autism-rates-are-it-really-rise

The possibility that autism numbers have jumped as children's' diagnoses are changed has been discussed, says Annette Estes, director of the University of Washington's Autism Center in Seattle. The Penn State study's use of the vast special education database makes a convincing case that is happening, she says. But it doesn't explain all of the increase. "People who are in the field are generally in consensus that the majority of the increase is due to progress in our ability to diagnose and identify people with autism in a broader spectrum than used to be possible," Estes says. "But then there is this portion of an increase that is not accounted for in a lot of statistical studies that are done."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, the numbers of autism, the incidence, is actually increasing.

https://www.science.org/content/article/autism-rates-are-it-really-rise

The possibility that autism numbers have jumped as children's' diagnoses are changed has been discussed, says Annette Estes, director of the University of Washington's Autism Center in Seattle. The Penn State study's use of the vast special education database makes a convincing case that is happening, she says. But it doesn't explain all of the increase. "People who are in the field are generally in consensus that the majority of the increase is due to progress in our ability to diagnose and identify people with autism in a broader spectrum than used to be possible," Estes says. "But then there is this portion of an increase that is not accounted for in a lot of statistical studies that are done."

A portion. How much? Is it other dx now being labeled as autism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, the numbers of autism, the incidence, is actually increasing.

https://www.science.org/content/article/autism-rates-are-it-really-rise

The possibility that autism numbers have jumped as children's' diagnoses are changed has been discussed, says Annette Estes, director of the University of Washington's Autism Center in Seattle. The Penn State study's use of the vast special education database makes a convincing case that is happening, she says. But it doesn't explain all of the increase. "People who are in the field are generally in consensus that the majority of the increase is due to progress in our ability to diagnose and identify people with autism in a broader spectrum than used to be possible," Estes says. "But then there is this portion of an increase that is not accounted for in a lot of statistical studies that are done."

That is the opposite of what the article says


But Baio, believes much of the increase they have seen since 2000 comes from growing awareness of autism and more sensitive screening tools. For example, he says, there are now more autism cases with milder symptoms, such as normal or above-normal intellectual ability. At the same time, the number of children identified with autism by experts in the community—such as the school special education programs examined by the Penn State scientists—has come closer to matching the CDC's more comprehensive screening methods.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, the numbers of autism, the incidence, is actually increasing.

https://www.science.org/content/article/autism-rates-are-it-really-rise

The possibility that autism numbers have jumped as children's' diagnoses are changed has been discussed, says Annette Estes, director of the University of Washington's Autism Center in Seattle. The Penn State study's use of the vast special education database makes a convincing case that is happening, she says. But it doesn't explain all of the increase. "People who are in the field are generally in consensus that the majority of the increase is due to progress in our ability to diagnose and identify people with autism in a broader spectrum than used to be possible," Estes says. "But then there is this portion of an increase that is not accounted for in a lot of statistical studies that are done."

That is the opposite of what the article says


But Baio, believes much of the increase they have seen since 2000 comes from growing awareness of autism and more sensitive screening tools. For example, he says, there are now more autism cases with milder symptoms, such as normal or above-normal intellectual ability. At the same time, the number of children identified with autism by experts in the community—such as the school special education programs examined by the Penn State scientists—has come closer to matching the CDC's more comprehensive screening methods.

Read the article again. Especially the last paragraph, which was quoted. Much of the increase is in diagnosing - some of it cannot be explained and seems to be a real increase in incidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, the numbers of autism, the incidence, is actually increasing.

https://www.science.org/content/article/autism-rates-are-it-really-rise

The possibility that autism numbers have jumped as children's' diagnoses are changed has been discussed, says Annette Estes, director of the University of Washington's Autism Center in Seattle. The Penn State study's use of the vast special education database makes a convincing case that is happening, she says. But it doesn't explain all of the increase. "People who are in the field are generally in consensus that the majority of the increase is due to progress in our ability to diagnose and identify people with autism in a broader spectrum than used to be possible," Estes says. "But then there is this portion of an increase that is not accounted for in a lot of statistical studies that are done."

That is the opposite of what the article says


But Baio, believes much of the increase they have seen since 2000 comes from growing awareness of autism and more sensitive screening tools. For example, he says, there are now more autism cases with milder symptoms, such as normal or above-normal intellectual ability. At the same time, the number of children identified with autism by experts in the community—such as the school special education programs examined by the Penn State scientists—has come closer to matching the CDC's more comprehensive screening methods.

Read the article again. Especially the last paragraph, which was quoted. Much of the increase is in diagnosing - some of it cannot be explained and seems to be a real increase in incidence.

The article doesn't say that at all. It says 2/3 of the new diagnosis correspond to a label change and they clearly see that because that population dropped off what they used to label as intellectual disability. The other 1/3 comes from growing awareness of what autism is. That's it.


Add to that, accwss to the INTERNET has enabled parents to find information about symptoms they are observing at home and find answers and then seek diagnosis.

There are many reasons who more people are being DIAGNOSED with autism. There is zero EVIDENCE that there is an increase in the rate of autism.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Autism is a medical condition causing brain inflammation. I wonder how many years it will take for this to be accepted ? How many kids will suffer, how many families will suffer?

There are so many groups trying to normalize autism, saying it's not a bad thing. That will hinder the search for a cause and a cure or prevention.



No. It. Is. Not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Autism is a medical condition causing brain inflammation. I wonder how many years it will take for this to be accepted ? How many kids will suffer, how many families will suffer?

There are so many groups trying to normalize autism, saying it's not a bad thing. That will hinder the search for a cause and a cure or prevention.

No. It. Is. Not.

DP. I'm not sure about inflammation but it's clearly a medical condition - rather than a quirky personality, if that's the alternative.