Is MCPS systemically Biased against Boys?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t there a social emotion component to Girls on the Run? Encouraging and empowering girls to be leaders? No different than Asian Alliance and African American clubs.


My younger DD did it at a private school where it was focused on body positivity because they had girls with ED as early as third grade. My DD was obsessed with weighing less than 100 lbs. it helped her be proud of having a strong body rather than a stick thin one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep we've seen it too. Also in our Bethesda ES, there are no male teachers and no male adminstrators. The only males working in the building are the building services and janitorial staff.

I've seen little attempts by MCPS to address the massive gender imbalance in hiring.


It's not an MCPS imbalance in hiring. It's a gender imbalance in the number of education majors who are women vs. men. Teaching has always traditionally been seen as a woman's career (I bet teachers would be paid much better if it was a male-dominated field!). The way to address the gender imbalance in schools is to encourage more boys to go into teaching, which won't happen until we change societal expectations of men as providers and women as nurturers.


We heard the same thing in tech -- not enough "pipeline" of women so that's why STEM fields had a huge gender imbalance. So, we focused on ensuring gender balance at the college level, which is why the STEM fields at many universities are now evenly balanced in terms of students studying. The result is more women in STEM fields, since more women are being educated in those fields. We made STEM "cool" even at the grade school level, which is great.

But... no such efforts when the gender imbalance is the other way. Again, we're failing our boys.






The problem with your comparison with STEM is that girls/women have traditionally been seen as not being good enough for these professions, while teaching was seen as not good enough for boys/men - because it doesn't pay enough, it's "easy," etc. (in both cases, boys/men are seen as superior).



Excuses, excuses. We heard a million reasons why women couldn't enter field X and they proved them wrong. Why don't we apply the same to boys?


You realize that women still drop out of STEM careers at shockingly high rates? The problem of women in STEM is far from over. Do not be so smug. You have nothing to be smug about.


Some of us acknowledge brain differences between biological sexes, rather than blame some bogeyman for our preference toward the verbal.


NP. You couldn’t answer PP’s argument, so you’re trying to have it both ways. If there are “brain differences between biological sexes,” then why should we encourage boys to go into education?



No, I am saying that women "on average" are less likely to be successful in STEM due to brain differences, so I do not attribute women dropping out as due to discrimination against girls, therefore we do not need the entire education system to be tilted toward helping girls succeed in STEM. Follow along...


https://cerebromente.org.br/n11/mente/eisntein/cerebro-homens.html
Source?



You'll have to go back to 2014 and prior to find some real studies.


Crazy how these brain differences don't exist in developing countries.
https://engineering.purdue.edu/ENE/News/the-stem-paradox-why-are-muslimmajority-countries-producing-so-many-female-engineers
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: