Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This kind of thing drives me crazy because dressing up isn’t necessarily free. How is it equity to add one more costume request to a family budget?
What about pajama day? I never understood how that was equitable. PJs are optional, kids can sleep in their clothes.
A lot of schools eliminated this —also under pressure from fundamentalists.
why are you blaming fundamentalists when you probably dont really know why pajama day was cancelled?
I can tell you why our school cancelled it. Not all kids have nice pajamas that they would feel good about wearing out of the house.
Then they can wear sweats/shorts and a t-shirt. No need to cancel these things.
So...why have pajama day?
I meant the kids that don’t want to wear pjs can opt to do that, why do any event under your philosophy?
My son never wanted to wear pjs to school and we are not low income. But that shouldn’t keep others from doing it. My your standard nothing would be okay.
Why not have a different day? Like if the schools had Wear Your Horseback Riding Clothes day, on the one hand, you could say, "Just wear jeans and a t-shirt," or on the other hand, you could say, "Maybe the school should have a different school-spirit day that all kids can participate in."
For what it's worth, in elementary school, my middle-class kids slept in adult T-shirts, which were their pajamas, and they didn't wear them to school on pajama day. So it's not just the poors who have potential issues participating in a pajama day.