Would you move to Arlington or Mclean for SFH living?

Anonymous
Thanks to PP for putting to rest any claim that Arlington residents are even remotely laid back. They just pick different areas to reveal their nerdy competitiveness (walk scores rather than SAT scores).
Anonymous
^ You sound laid back too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So...let's recap.

Arlington: smaller houses, lots, better commute, better walking possibilities

McLean: bigger houses, lots, better schools, worse commute

I'll leave out the bigger question of diversity.

Many of the posts in this thread address diversity. McLean is the better option. N Arlington posters are in denial of their own bias.


Hm. I think it's still in the toss-up pile. Self-proclaimed POCs here prefer McLean. McLean is also more white based on straight demographics.


That comes back to the North/South issue.

McLean is whiter and less diverse than Arlington as a whole, but the whitest parts of NoVa are in North Arlington (the areas that feed into Discovery, Jamestown, McKinley, Nottingham, Taylor and Tuckahoe ES, and Williamsburg MS).

While some might claim the North/South divide is artificial, it was people in Arlington, not McLean, who popularized that distinction, so it must mean something to them. Route 50 existed long before the residents of the area made “North Arlington” a thing, so it’s clearly intended to get at something besides geography.


Arlington is divided because of historical housing patterns based on race and SES. Poor and minority families have lived here - segregated - for many years and, sadly, the effects of segregation are still seen today. Even today, new affordable housing developments are not well distributed across the county.

McLean doesn't have that issue because historically it didn't have a significant # of poor or black/brown residents. Maybe little pocket here or there. But most of "those" people were segregated further south in Fairfax County. Even today there is very little SES diversity. How much affordable housing is there in McLean today?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find McLean more attractive. Arlington seems to be a mix of old houses built for WWII-era government workers and new McMansions that are way too big for their postage-size lots. You see some of that in McLean as well, but at least the lots are generally big enough to leave some room for a yard.


The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either.


You obviously have never even been to Arlington. Why are you commenting?

Hint: look at a map and see where the Metro stations are.



I’m also from NYC. Your definition and my definition of walkable may be different.


OK - let's call it "Arlington walkable".

If you want less arbitrary terms, how about this for my N Arlington neighborhood:
Walk score: 85 / 100
Transit score: 72 / 100
Bike score: 83 / 100

Regardless, many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington.

Or maybe you don't understand N v. S Arlington? Rt 50 is the dividing line. Everything N of Rt 50 (incl. 7 of 9 metro stops) is considered "North Arlington".


DP. It depends on where you live in N Arlington. I’d be lying if I said most of it is walkable. Maybe 20% of it is. The rest is the straight up suburbs. many streets don’t even have sidewalks.


OK? No one said MOST of it is walkable. But, the overall walkscore is 69 so a good portion is walkable (https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington).

Which streets in Arlington don't have sidewalks?

McLean doesn't have sidewalks...perhaps you are confusing the two...




Re-read your own post, dude.


Yes, and?

"Many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington." <> "Most of Arlington is walkable"


Except the website you provided for that 69 walk score is for both N and S Arlington... not just N Arlington.

Are you having trouble keeping up with your own information? First you claim that many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington, but that 69 number includes S Arlington stats...

If you’re gonna to provide stats, try to make sure you understand what you’re saying...


What exactly is incorrect about "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"?

16 of the top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA.
https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington

I'd say that counts as "many".

If the WalkScore website listed NA separately I'd be happy to give a more precise number.

The metro line (Ballston-Rosslyn) is walkable. Your own stats show that. That area isn’t “most” of N Arlington.

The rest of N Arlington is the straight up burbs. Wavered, Cherrydale, Yorktown, Bellevue, etc is all not very walkable.

I used to live in N Arlington, and there’s no way that I’d ever lie and say that “many of N arl is walkable”. It’s not.

There’s nothing wrong with that. And it’s not a big deal but for whatever reason, you’re going out your way to give me and others the impression that it is when it’s not.


Here is exactly what I said: "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington". It was in response to someone who mistakenly thought the Metro stations were all in South Arlington.

I'm not sure why you continue to misread that after I've explained and repeated it a few times.

If you'd like to share any facts to prove otherwise, feel free. But what I wrote is true AND I provided factual backup - 16 of top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA. Oops - that should be 15.5 (one splits across Rt 50).

If you're too lazy to click on the link:


Nothing is misread. I already said what you’re showing me. The metro line from Ballston to Rosslyn is walkable. The rest isn’t.

This isn’t hard.



It's not hard when you don't misread what I wrote.

So you agree with me that "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"? Great. Could have just agreed with me a few pages ago.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find McLean more attractive. Arlington seems to be a mix of old houses built for WWII-era government workers and new McMansions that are way too big for their postage-size lots. You see some of that in McLean as well, but at least the lots are generally big enough to leave some room for a yard.


The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either.


You obviously have never even been to Arlington. Why are you commenting?

Hint: look at a map and see where the Metro stations are.



I’m also from NYC. Your definition and my definition of walkable may be different.


OK - let's call it "Arlington walkable".

If you want less arbitrary terms, how about this for my N Arlington neighborhood:
Walk score: 85 / 100
Transit score: 72 / 100
Bike score: 83 / 100

Regardless, many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington.

Or maybe you don't understand N v. S Arlington? Rt 50 is the dividing line. Everything N of Rt 50 (incl. 7 of 9 metro stops) is considered "North Arlington".


DP. It depends on where you live in N Arlington. I’d be lying if I said most of it is walkable. Maybe 20% of it is. The rest is the straight up suburbs. many streets don’t even have sidewalks.


OK? No one said MOST of it is walkable. But, the overall walkscore is 69 so a good portion is walkable (https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington).

Which streets in Arlington don't have sidewalks?

McLean doesn't have sidewalks...perhaps you are confusing the two...




Re-read your own post, dude.


Yes, and?

"Many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington." <> "Most of Arlington is walkable"


Except the website you provided for that 69 walk score is for both N and S Arlington... not just N Arlington.

Are you having trouble keeping up with your own information? First you claim that many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington, but that 69 number includes S Arlington stats...

If you’re gonna to provide stats, try to make sure you understand what you’re saying...


What exactly is incorrect about "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"?

16 of the top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA.
https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington

I'd say that counts as "many".

If the WalkScore website listed NA separately I'd be happy to give a more precise number.

The metro line (Ballston-Rosslyn) is walkable. Your own stats show that. That area isn’t “most” of N Arlington.

The rest of N Arlington is the straight up burbs. Wavered, Cherrydale, Yorktown, Bellevue, etc is all not very walkable.

I used to live in N Arlington, and there’s no way that I’d ever lie and say that “many of N arl is walkable”. It’s not.

There’s nothing wrong with that. And it’s not a big deal but for whatever reason, you’re going out your way to give me and others the impression that it is when it’s not.


Here is exactly what I said: "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington". It was in response to someone who mistakenly thought the Metro stations were all in South Arlington.

I'm not sure why you continue to misread that after I've explained and repeated it a few times.

If you'd like to share any facts to prove otherwise, feel free. But what I wrote is true AND I provided factual backup - 16 of top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA. Oops - that should be 15.5 (one splits across Rt 50).

If you're too lazy to click on the link:


Nothing is misread. I already said what you’re showing me. The metro line from Ballston to Rosslyn is walkable. The rest isn’t.

This isn’t hard.

Also, you were trying to sneakily use all of Arlington stats (that 69 number) to go in your favor when you were clearly only talking about N Arlington.

So again, no one misread anything. I just called you out on your shit and now you’re still scrambling to defend yourself.


I clearly said "overall" and gave the link for all of Arlington...

Anyway, like I said, many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington. Not in S Arlington like the PP mistakenly thought.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find McLean more attractive. Arlington seems to be a mix of old houses built for WWII-era government workers and new McMansions that are way too big for their postage-size lots. You see some of that in McLean as well, but at least the lots are generally big enough to leave some room for a yard.


The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either.


You obviously have never even been to Arlington. Why are you commenting?

Hint: look at a map and see where the Metro stations are.



I’m also from NYC. Your definition and my definition of walkable may be different.


OK - let's call it "Arlington walkable".

If you want less arbitrary terms, how about this for my N Arlington neighborhood:
Walk score: 85 / 100
Transit score: 72 / 100
Bike score: 83 / 100

Regardless, many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington.

Or maybe you don't understand N v. S Arlington? Rt 50 is the dividing line. Everything N of Rt 50 (incl. 7 of 9 metro stops) is considered "North Arlington".


DP. It depends on where you live in N Arlington. I’d be lying if I said most of it is walkable. Maybe 20% of it is. The rest is the straight up suburbs. many streets don’t even have sidewalks.


OK? No one said MOST of it is walkable. But, the overall walkscore is 69 so a good portion is walkable (https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington).

Which streets in Arlington don't have sidewalks?

McLean doesn't have sidewalks...perhaps you are confusing the two...




Re-read your own post, dude.


Yes, and?

"Many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington." <> "Most of Arlington is walkable"


Except the website you provided for that 69 walk score is for both N and S Arlington... not just N Arlington.

Are you having trouble keeping up with your own information? First you claim that many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington, but that 69 number includes S Arlington stats...

If you’re gonna to provide stats, try to make sure you understand what you’re saying...


What exactly is incorrect about "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"?

16 of the top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA.
https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington

I'd say that counts as "many".

If the WalkScore website listed NA separately I'd be happy to give a more precise number.

The metro line (Ballston-Rosslyn) is walkable. Your own stats show that. That area isn’t “most” of N Arlington.

The rest of N Arlington is the straight up burbs. Wavered, Cherrydale, Yorktown, Bellevue, etc is all not very walkable.

I used to live in N Arlington, and there’s no way that I’d ever lie and say that “many of N arl is walkable”. It’s not.

There’s nothing wrong with that. And it’s not a big deal but for whatever reason, you’re going out your way to give me and others the impression that it is when it’s not.


Here is exactly what I said: "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington". It was in response to someone who mistakenly thought the Metro stations were all in South Arlington.

I'm not sure why you continue to misread that after I've explained and repeated it a few times.

If you'd like to share any facts to prove otherwise, feel free. But what I wrote is true AND I provided factual backup - 16 of top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA. Oops - that should be 15.5 (one splits across Rt 50).

If you're too lazy to click on the link:


Nothing is misread. I already said what you’re showing me. The metro line from Ballston to Rosslyn is walkable. The rest isn’t.

This isn’t hard.

Also, you were trying to sneakily use all of Arlington stats (that 69 number) to go in your favor when you were clearly only talking about N Arlington.

So again, no one misread anything. I just called you out on your shit and now you’re still scrambling to defend yourself.


I clearly said "overall" and gave the link for all of Arlington...

Anyway, like I said, many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington. Not in S Arlington like the PP mistakenly thought.


Lol the classic “moving the goalposts”. Nice.

And from your own post, S Arlington is ...fairly..walkable.

Shirlington, Columbia Pike, Pentagon and Pentagon City, Arlandria suddenly aren’t walkable now? News to me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find McLean more attractive. Arlington seems to be a mix of old houses built for WWII-era government workers and new McMansions that are way too big for their postage-size lots. You see some of that in McLean as well, but at least the lots are generally big enough to leave some room for a yard.


The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either.


You obviously have never even been to Arlington. Why are you commenting?

Hint: look at a map and see where the Metro stations are.



I’m also from NYC. Your definition and my definition of walkable may be different.


OK - let's call it "Arlington walkable".

If you want less arbitrary terms, how about this for my N Arlington neighborhood:
Walk score: 85 / 100
Transit score: 72 / 100
Bike score: 83 / 100

Regardless, many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington.

Or maybe you don't understand N v. S Arlington? Rt 50 is the dividing line. Everything N of Rt 50 (incl. 7 of 9 metro stops) is considered "North Arlington".


DP. It depends on where you live in N Arlington. I’d be lying if I said most of it is walkable. Maybe 20% of it is. The rest is the straight up suburbs. many streets don’t even have sidewalks.


OK? No one said MOST of it is walkable. But, the overall walkscore is 69 so a good portion is walkable (https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington).

Which streets in Arlington don't have sidewalks?

McLean doesn't have sidewalks...perhaps you are confusing the two...




Re-read your own post, dude.


Yes, and?

"Many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington." <> "Most of Arlington is walkable"


Except the website you provided for that 69 walk score is for both N and S Arlington... not just N Arlington.

Are you having trouble keeping up with your own information? First you claim that many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington, but that 69 number includes S Arlington stats...

If you’re gonna to provide stats, try to make sure you understand what you’re saying...


What exactly is incorrect about "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"?

16 of the top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA.
https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington

I'd say that counts as "many".

If the WalkScore website listed NA separately I'd be happy to give a more precise number.

The metro line (Ballston-Rosslyn) is walkable. Your own stats show that. That area isn’t “most” of N Arlington.

The rest of N Arlington is the straight up burbs. Wavered, Cherrydale, Yorktown, Bellevue, etc is all not very walkable.

I used to live in N Arlington, and there’s no way that I’d ever lie and say that “many of N arl is walkable”. It’s not.

There’s nothing wrong with that. And it’s not a big deal but for whatever reason, you’re going out your way to give me and others the impression that it is when it’s not.


Here is exactly what I said: "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington". It was in response to someone who mistakenly thought the Metro stations were all in South Arlington.

I'm not sure why you continue to misread that after I've explained and repeated it a few times.

If you'd like to share any facts to prove otherwise, feel free. But what I wrote is true AND I provided factual backup - 16 of top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA. Oops - that should be 15.5 (one splits across Rt 50).

If you're too lazy to click on the link:


Nothing is misread. I already said what you’re showing me. The metro line from Ballston to Rosslyn is walkable. The rest isn’t.

This isn’t hard.

Also, you were trying to sneakily use all of Arlington stats (that 69 number) to go in your favor when you were clearly only talking about N Arlington.

So again, no one misread anything. I just called you out on your shit and now you’re still scrambling to defend yourself.


I clearly said "overall" and gave the link for all of Arlington...

Anyway, like I said, many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington. Not in S Arlington like the PP mistakenly thought.


Lol the classic “moving the goalposts”. Nice.

And from your own post, S Arlington is ...fairly..walkable.

Shirlington, Columbia Pike, Pentagon and Pentagon City, Arlandria suddenly aren’t walkable now? News to me.

My bad. I forgot to throw in Crystal City and Fairlington in there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find McLean more attractive. Arlington seems to be a mix of old houses built for WWII-era government workers and new McMansions that are way too big for their postage-size lots. You see some of that in McLean as well, but at least the lots are generally big enough to leave some room for a yard.


The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either.


You obviously have never even been to Arlington. Why are you commenting?

Hint: look at a map and see where the Metro stations are.



I’m also from NYC. Your definition and my definition of walkable may be different.


OK - let's call it "Arlington walkable".

If you want less arbitrary terms, how about this for my N Arlington neighborhood:
Walk score: 85 / 100
Transit score: 72 / 100
Bike score: 83 / 100

Regardless, many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington.

Or maybe you don't understand N v. S Arlington? Rt 50 is the dividing line. Everything N of Rt 50 (incl. 7 of 9 metro stops) is considered "North Arlington".


DP. It depends on where you live in N Arlington. I’d be lying if I said most of it is walkable. Maybe 20% of it is. The rest is the straight up suburbs. many streets don’t even have sidewalks.


OK? No one said MOST of it is walkable. But, the overall walkscore is 69 so a good portion is walkable (https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington).

Which streets in Arlington don't have sidewalks?

McLean doesn't have sidewalks...perhaps you are confusing the two...




Re-read your own post, dude.


Yes, and?

"Many of the "walkable" areas ARE in North Arlington." <> "Most of Arlington is walkable"


Except the website you provided for that 69 walk score is for both N and S Arlington... not just N Arlington.

Are you having trouble keeping up with your own information? First you claim that many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington, but that 69 number includes S Arlington stats...

If you’re gonna to provide stats, try to make sure you understand what you’re saying...


What exactly is incorrect about "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington"?

16 of the top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA.
https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Arlington

I'd say that counts as "many".

If the WalkScore website listed NA separately I'd be happy to give a more precise number.

The metro line (Ballston-Rosslyn) is walkable. Your own stats show that. That area isn’t “most” of N Arlington.

The rest of N Arlington is the straight up burbs. Wavered, Cherrydale, Yorktown, Bellevue, etc is all not very walkable.

I used to live in N Arlington, and there’s no way that I’d ever lie and say that “many of N arl is walkable”. It’s not.

There’s nothing wrong with that. And it’s not a big deal but for whatever reason, you’re going out your way to give me and others the impression that it is when it’s not.


Here is exactly what I said: "many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington". It was in response to someone who mistakenly thought the Metro stations were all in South Arlington.

I'm not sure why you continue to misread that after I've explained and repeated it a few times.

If you'd like to share any facts to prove otherwise, feel free. But what I wrote is true AND I provided factual backup - 16 of top 20 walkable neighborhoods are in NA. Oops - that should be 15.5 (one splits across Rt 50).

If you're too lazy to click on the link:


Nothing is misread. I already said what you’re showing me. The metro line from Ballston to Rosslyn is walkable. The rest isn’t.

This isn’t hard.

Also, you were trying to sneakily use all of Arlington stats (that 69 number) to go in your favor when you were clearly only talking about N Arlington.

So again, no one misread anything. I just called you out on your shit and now you’re still scrambling to defend yourself.


I clearly said "overall" and gave the link for all of Arlington...

Anyway, like I said, many of the walkable areas are in N Arlington. Not in S Arlington like the PP mistakenly thought.


Lol the classic “moving the goalposts”. Nice.

And from your own post, S Arlington is ...fairly..walkable.

Shirlington, Columbia Pike, Pentagon and Pentagon City, Arlandria suddenly aren’t walkable now? News to me.



OMG - are you being intentionally obtuse? Or can you really just not read?

I said MANY of the walkable parts are in N Arlington. Not ALL or even MANY.

PP thought that Ballston-Clarendon-Courthouse areas were in S Arlington. Here was PP's comment that I responded to:
"The nicer neighborhoods of McLean are way nicer looking than Arlington. The N Arlington and McLean neighborhoods that border Arlington and falls church look very similar. Then parts of south Arlington are more urban and walkable. I would not say N Arlington is a walkable area either."

How many more pages are you going to completely misread what I wrote?

Anonymous
^^ and the PP came back to admit her mistake:
"PP here. I stand corrected. I didn't realize that Ballston, Ballston and Clarendon were in N Arlington. I thought that was S Arlington. I can admit when I am wrong."

Anonymous
^^ and that should say "Not ALL or even MOST"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:^^ and the PP came back to admit her mistake:
"PP here. I stand corrected. I didn't realize that Ballston, Ballston and Clarendon were in N Arlington. I thought that was S Arlington. I can admit when I am wrong."



I am the pp who mistakenly thought Clarendon and Ballston were in S Arlington.

Both S AND N Arlington are more walkable than McLean.

Can we just give it a rest?
Anonymous
OP here. Lots of info to process, thank you all for informative input! I didn't realize it would be controversial and certainly was a bit surprised it turned into a political discussion. I do find some things said about Arlington to be a turn off, but I think there are other pragmatic issues to decide upon as well.

We drove around different areas last year, there is a part where Arlington meets Mclean and these parts are very similar and indistinguishable to me looking at them from the car, very similar homes and yards and walkability, which seems non-existent. We aren't looking into these areas because we need some walkability, we will have our foreign family living with us 6 months out of the year and they don't drive, don't want them to feel trapped without being able to walk to coffee shop or at least a couple of restaurants. We also want our older kids to be able to walk to some places without driving, so areas where teens are seeing walking around to coffee/ice cream/fast food/each other's homes are preferred.

It appears that both Mclean and Arlington have areas with some walkability while being SFH suburban communities. Mclean has downtown area with SFH communities around it and Arlington areas we would look into are around Highway 29, so it would be walking to strip mall type of places in both locations. Comparing areas walkable to DT Mclean and Arlington areas walkable to businesses along its busier streets, Arlington still seems a bit more urban by character and what I would personally prefer, plus closer to DC. I also like descriptions some poster shared of their Arlington neighborhoods, and it's what we are looking for, especially if considering that there are enough kids of MS/HS age, we aren't interested in toddler/ES kid age only type of areas. Proximity to Metro is better in N.Arlington, but it's still not walkable in my eyes for commute, maybe as a backup option very occasionally? We are coming from a very dense urban area, lived in apartments and a rowhouse, N.Arlington and Dt.Mclean still are very suburban areas for us and we will be relying on a car, which is ok, but want to also have an option to walk somewhere.

Schools might be something I would want to discuss further, as I didn't feel Arlington schools would be a good fit, as they were described as laid back. We are not looking for laid back environment, we actually had to switch our kids from a more laid back good school to another more academically intense school. Kids are happier in more rigorous academic setting after having tried both. If schools are considered more rigorous and academically advanced in Mclean, this is what might be a deciding factor for us as we cannot afford private schools.

Ideally if we had a lot of money we would live in a very urban area and go to private schools, but we also need more space (5 bedrooms) and our budget won't allow living in places like Clarendon/Ballston or parts of DC. This would be a compromise. So, I am wondering if there are any people who can chime in from Mclean who live in more walkable parts of it closer to downtown strips and whether anyone is walking there. Arlington posters say that people generally do walk in their suburban neighborhoods. I like that.

Basically we would prefer somewhat walkable suburban community with academically rigorous public schools, with decent commute to DC/Tysons/Amazon campus where we can get a 5-bedr house for under 1.2m (older home and small yard are ok) and a short drive into the city on weekends (10-20min max). If there are any other areas that meet the needs I haven't considered, please chime in.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Lots of info to process, thank you all for informative input! I didn't realize it would be controversial and certainly was a bit surprised it turned into a political discussion. I do find some things said about Arlington to be a turn off, but I think there are other pragmatic issues to decide upon as well.

We drove around different areas last year, there is a part where Arlington meets Mclean and these parts are very similar and indistinguishable to me looking at them from the car, very similar homes and yards and walkability, which seems non-existent. We aren't looking into these areas because we need some walkability, we will have our foreign family living with us 6 months out of the year and they don't drive, don't want them to feel trapped without being able to walk to coffee shop or at least a couple of restaurants. We also want our older kids to be able to walk to some places without driving, so areas where teens are seeing walking around to coffee/ice cream/fast food/each other's homes are preferred.

It appears that both Mclean and Arlington have areas with some walkability while being SFH suburban communities. Mclean has downtown area with SFH communities around it and Arlington areas we would look into are around Highway 29, so it would be walking to strip mall type of places in both locations. Comparing areas walkable to DT Mclean and Arlington areas walkable to businesses along its busier streets, Arlington still seems a bit more urban by character and what I would personally prefer, plus closer to DC. I also like descriptions some poster shared of their Arlington neighborhoods, and it's what we are looking for, especially if considering that there are enough kids of MS/HS age, we aren't interested in toddler/ES kid age only type of areas. Proximity to Metro is better in N.Arlington, but it's still not walkable in my eyes for commute, maybe as a backup option very occasionally? We are coming from a very dense urban area, lived in apartments and a rowhouse, N.Arlington and Dt.Mclean still are very suburban areas for us and we will be relying on a car, which is ok, but want to also have an option to walk somewhere.

Schools might be something I would want to discuss further, as I didn't feel Arlington schools would be a good fit, as they were described as laid back. We are not looking for laid back environment, we actually had to switch our kids from a more laid back good school to another more academically intense school. Kids are happier in more rigorous academic setting after having tried both. If schools are considered more rigorous and academically advanced in Mclean, this is what might be a deciding factor for us as we cannot afford private schools.

Ideally if we had a lot of money we would live in a very urban area and go to private schools, but we also need more space (5 bedrooms) and our budget won't allow living in places like Clarendon/Ballston or parts of DC. This would be a compromise. So, I am wondering if there are any people who can chime in from Mclean who live in more walkable parts of it closer to downtown strips and whether anyone is walking there. Arlington posters say that people generally do walk in their suburban neighborhoods. I like that.

Basically we would prefer somewhat walkable suburban community with academically rigorous public schools, with decent commute to DC/Tysons/Amazon campus where we can get a 5-bedr house for under 1.2m (older home and small yard are ok) and a short drive into the city on weekends (10-20min max). If there are any other areas that meet the needs I haven't considered, please chime in.


We live in McLean behind Total Wine etc. We can walk to Giant, Total Wine, Cava, AutoZone, Starbucks, 3 7/11s, 6 banks, Balducci's, Salons/Spas/Barbers/Dry Cleaning/Music and Arts, 2-3 good restaurants and to Lewinsville Park. My house has a walk score of 84, which I think is pretty decent for a suburb. In McLean you have to focus on neighborhoods around Franklin Sherman ES close to Old Dominion and/or Chain Bridge Rd, you will find a lot walkability in this area. This area can be expensive, TH's go for 950k+ and SFH start at 1.2mil, just to give you an idea. Good luck with your search!
Anonymous
PP above. Yes, we do walk a lot, especially in Summers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Lots of info to process, thank you all for informative input! I didn't realize it would be controversial and certainly was a bit surprised it turned into a political discussion. I do find some things said about Arlington to be a turn off, but I think there are other pragmatic issues to decide upon as well.

We drove around different areas last year, there is a part where Arlington meets Mclean and these parts are very similar and indistinguishable to me looking at them from the car, very similar homes and yards and walkability, which seems non-existent. We aren't looking into these areas because we need some walkability, we will have our foreign family living with us 6 months out of the year and they don't drive, don't want them to feel trapped without being able to walk to coffee shop or at least a couple of restaurants. We also want our older kids to be able to walk to some places without driving, so areas where teens are seeing walking around to coffee/ice cream/fast food/each other's homes are preferred.

It appears that both Mclean and Arlington have areas with some walkability while being SFH suburban communities. Mclean has downtown area with SFH communities around it and Arlington areas we would look into are around Highway 29, so it would be walking to strip mall type of places in both locations. Comparing areas walkable to DT Mclean and Arlington areas walkable to businesses along its busier streets, Arlington still seems a bit more urban by character and what I would personally prefer, plus closer to DC. I also like descriptions some poster shared of their Arlington neighborhoods, and it's what we are looking for, especially if considering that there are enough kids of MS/HS age, we aren't interested in toddler/ES kid age only type of areas. Proximity to Metro is better in N.Arlington, but it's still not walkable in my eyes for commute, maybe as a backup option very occasionally? We are coming from a very dense urban area, lived in apartments and a rowhouse, N.Arlington and Dt.Mclean still are very suburban areas for us and we will be relying on a car, which is ok, but want to also have an option to walk somewhere.

Schools might be something I would want to discuss further, as I didn't feel Arlington schools would be a good fit, as they were described as laid back. We are not looking for laid back environment, we actually had to switch our kids from a more laid back good school to another more academically intense school. Kids are happier in more rigorous academic setting after having tried both. If schools are considered more rigorous and academically advanced in Mclean, this is what might be a deciding factor for us as we cannot afford private schools.

Ideally if we had a lot of money we would live in a very urban area and go to private schools, but we also need more space (5 bedrooms) and our budget won't allow living in places like Clarendon/Ballston or parts of DC. This would be a compromise. So, I am wondering if there are any people who can chime in from Mclean who live in more walkable parts of it closer to downtown strips and whether anyone is walking there. Arlington posters say that people generally do walk in their suburban neighborhoods. I like that.

Basically we would prefer somewhat walkable suburban community with academically rigorous public schools, with decent commute to DC/Tysons/Amazon campus where we can get a 5-bedr house for under 1.2m (older home and small yard are ok) and a short drive into the city on weekends (10-20min max). If there are any other areas that meet the needs I haven't considered, please chime in.


You're going to have a tough time in either location for a 5 BD with that budget.

Check out Pimmit Hills as a PP joked about earlier. I believe Marshall offers an IB program which is academically rigorous. Falls Church or Falls Church City might have more options in your budget and still be walkable.

And FWIW I do think the laid back comments were describing parents, not academics...

McLean:
https://www.redfin.com/VA/McLean/1601-Evers-Dr-22101/home/9398785 (bit of a walk to DT McLean but you could do it)

Arlington:
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Arlington/5805-26th-St-N-22207/home/11226263 (Yorktown area - walkable near Rt 29)
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Arlington/5709-6th-St-N-22205/home/12027083 (west of Ballston - little bit walkable along Wilson)

Pimmit Hills:
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Falls-Church/7413-Sportsman-Dr-22043/home/9473414
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Falls-Church/1823-Olney-Rd-22043/home/9398518

Dunn Loring:
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Dunn-Loring/2169-Harithy-Dr-22027/home/9833786 (near Tysons/Mosaic)
post reply Forum Index » Real Estate
Message Quick Reply
Go to: