The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically the Mueller Report was a giant nothing burger weak attempt to delay the inevitable, which is a full investigation into treason of the Obama administration.

Who ordered the Steel Dossier? What grounds were the FISA warrants obtained? When did Obama knowingly order the DOJ and FBI to spy on candidate Trump?

So many questions and far worse than Watergate.

Lololollolololololololololololol..,, gotta catch my breath... lololololololololololol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - more than five times the redactions on volume 1 (collusion) or the lack of redactions on volume 2 (obstruction)?

There's still so many active investigations into Trump and his cronies. I think something big is still going to hit him.

The lack of redactions confirms that obstruction was flimsy at best. The 4 methods didnt substantiate obstruction on way or another like the redactions did on volume 1 proves no collusion.

Volume 2 continues the theory of a silent coup without proof and now the left are moving the goalposts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - more than five times the redactions on volume 1 (collusion) or the lack of redactions on volume 2 (obstruction)?

There's still so many active investigations into Trump and his cronies. I think something big is still going to hit him.

The lack of redactions confirms that obstruction was flimsy at best. The 4 methods didnt substantiate obstruction on way or another like the redactions did on volume 1 proves no collusion.

Volume 2 continues the theory of a silent coup without proof and now the left are moving the goalposts.

No the lack of redactions confirms that Trump did so much of his obstructing so publicly that they couldn't justify redactions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I just started.

"Although. . . the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, [it did not conspire or coordinate] with the Russian government."

Isn't this like finding stolen money and keeping it?

It's more like there is money that you know was stolen by someone that was then given to another person who also knew the money was stolen and that person offered it to you as a gift and you said "Thanks!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - more than five times the redactions on volume 1 (collusion) or the lack of redactions on volume 2 (obstruction)?

There's still so many active investigations into Trump and his cronies. I think something big is still going to hit him.

The lack of redactions confirms that obstruction was flimsy at best. The 4 methods didnt substantiate obstruction on way or another like the redactions did on volume 1 proves no collusion.

Volume 2 continues the theory of a silent coup without proof and now the left are moving the goalposts.

No the lack of redactions confirms that Trump did so much of his obstructing so publicly that they couldn't justify redactions.

Are you smoking right now or did the edibles kick in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is still quite a bit pending with a Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury was disband at the end of March.

Is that what Fox News is telling people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. I’m watching the news in Ohio right now. I would say the local news here has a conservative bent. It’s not always overt, but its there.
And even my local news is basically saying this report doesn’t exonerate him. They are saying he appears to have engaged in criminal behavior.
I’m floored.

This is what is happening outside of the bubble.
Pay attention.

[Anonymous]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-russian-interference-donald-trump.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

Mr. Mueller inherited a sweeping inquiry 23 months ago into whether Mr. Trump or any of his aides had coordinated with the Russian government’s campaign to sabotage the presidential election. The report found numerous contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Russians in the months before and after the election — meetings in pursuit of business deals, policy initiatives and political dirt about Hillary Clinton — but said there was “insufficient evidence” to establish that there had been a criminal conspiracy.

While the report does not find that the president or his campaign aides had committed any crimes in their contacts with Russians, it lays bare how Mr. Trump was elected with the help of a foreign power. When a federal inquiry was started to investigate the Russian effort, he took numerous steps to try to undermine it.

This is the heart of it - Russia helped Trump get elected President. Think about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. I’m watching the news in Ohio right now. I would say the local news here has a conservative bent. It’s not always overt, but its there.
And even my local news is basically saying this report doesn’t exonerate him. They are saying he appears to have engaged in criminal behavior.
I’m floored.

Interesting, thanks for sharing. I hope local news all over the country are like this.

[Anonymous]

I don't recall ever hearing that Guccifer 2.0 was *in fact* the GRU before.

[Anonymous]

Teflon Don

He may not make it for another run, but he'll make it through this term.

[Anonymous]

Vol. 2 is clearly the secret anri-pedopgile report that Mueller has been working with Trump on (at least according to Qanon)!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically the Mueller Report was a giant nothing burger weak attempt to delay the inevitable, which is a full investigation into treason of the Obama administration.

Who ordered the Steel Dossier? What grounds were the FISA warrants obtained? When did Obama knowingly order the DOJ and FBI to spy on candidate Trump?

So many questions and far worse than Watergate.

Sure, Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cons continue to look away from the dumpster fire. They don't care that Trump pressured his staff numerous times to break the law.

Think about that. They don't GAF that the president of the United States broke his oath of office to uphold the laws of the country.

Break what law?

He repeatedly asked his staff to break the law. They held firm and did not.

What law? Be specific.

18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2).

Hey PP, you got your answer. Now what do you say? Or are you too shy to respond?

Crickets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the Obama admin ordered the spying on an opposing party presidential candidate all based on a fake dossier paid for by a member of the Obama admin.

Here you go, timeline of treason.


06/15/16 Ex-MI-6 agent Christopher Steele is hired by Hillary Clinton’s campaign through Fusion GPS, according to UK court filings

06/20/16 Fusion GPS contractor Christopher Steele releases first memo related to Russian “Dossier”

07/05/16 FISA Court denies FBI request for surveillance of Trump campaign

07/05/16 Fusion GPS contractor Christopher Steele shares Russian “Dossier” with the FBI

07/30/16 FBI opens counterintelligence investigation into possible Russian “collusion” with Trump campaign led by Peter Strzok

08/15/16 FBI investigator Strzok texts mistress about needing an “insurance policy” against Trump

09/15/16 FISA Court approves FBI request for surveillance of Trump campaign based upon Russian “Dossier”


[url]https://theblacksphere.net/2018/01/timeline-of-treason-how-democrats-tried-to-fix-the-election/

Your timeline ignore the Trump Treason activity that dates back to 2013 as it relates to the 2016 campaign and election. So starting at June ignores all of the 5Eye material from before that launched the formal counterintelligence investigation.