|
Answer: No, MCPS didn't talk to teachers. MCPS is lying, saying that the state mandated this.
Yang immediately called out the lie. Someone concurred with Yang, maybe Montoya? Not sure. MCPS claims state mandated "exclusionary tracking" |
|
Claims that the state policy requires that they take away "exclusionary tracking"? Is that true?
|
Ooh, and Yang calls that out! |
| Montoya and Rivera-Oven pushing back. |
| How is it acceleration if its one classroom and some kids are ahead and some are behind... |
Yes, but they are not requiring they take away acceleration. |
|
Yay!! Kids who somehow don't meet criteria for compacted elem math (many of whom are not high SES, hmm) are forever held back and on a separate, unequal track.
Fully support this decision MCPS. Ignore all the haters |
Integrated Math 1 and 2 is a stripped down version of Alg 1, Alg 2 and Geometry, removing content to save time (3 year -> 2 year) , not accelerating |
| But what is "exclusionary tracking"? Doesn't their model still include this because kids will take Algebra 1 at different grades? I'm so confused. |
|
Yang: "3 levels of math in class. how do we operationalize?"
Have to catch your plane! Rivera-Oven, and Montoya, carry the banner! |
| Yang is so sweet while calling out bullsht. |
This is the state definition of exclusionary tracking/what the state prohibits: "Exclusionary Tracking refers to the practice of placing students into rigid learning tracks, often arbitrary and based on assumptions about their abilities, which limits their future opportunities in mathematics." |
| BOE members will represent their constituents. BOE should be county wide as a district, since MCPS is |
Right. Current tracks are NOT exclusionary. Kids can move up/down based on performance. |
That's the knock supposedly against compacted math, that it skips over material, but that's literally what they're changing to later on. And I would argue skipping/rushing over algebra and geometry is more detrimental than going through elementary math quickly. |