Chicago--ICE teargassing local police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coming to a Halloween near you. https://abcnews.go.com/US/border-patrol-agents-fire-allegedly-disrupting-childrens-halloween/story?id=126900354

"On Saturday, Border Patrol agents converged on the Old Irving Park neighborhood on the city's Northwest Side to conduct an immigration enforcement raid. Neighborhood residents claimed the agents interrupted a children's Halloween parade and allegedly deployed tear gas without warning on residents trying to intervene.

Video footage that was verified by ABC News showed agents deploying tear gas and tackling and arresting several people, including U.S. citizens, outside homes decked out in Halloween decorations."

So LICE tear gassed a neighbor Halloween parade?

All to get one construction worker....

Don't we all feel so safe with a bunch of goons randomly popping off tear gas and pepperballs in residential neighborhoods?

[Anonymous]

Update from Chicago- there are videos of immigration agents entering a day care center with their weapons and abducting a teacher in front of children and parents from this morning. The agents were masked and armed. Word is the teacher they took is an American citizen.

Do not forget that this is happening. The media is sleeping on the horror of what’s going on. Please amplify!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update from Chicago- there are videos of immigration agents entering a day care center with their weapons and abducting a teacher in front of children and parents from this morning. The agents were masked and armed. Word is the teacher they took is an American citizen.

Do not forget that this is happening. The media is sleeping on the horror of what’s going on. Please amplify!

Please post link to video so we can amplify

[Anonymous]

https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/video-daycare-teacher-detained-by-ice-agents-on-chicagos-north-side/?fbclid=IwY2xjawN4UDJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFhT1ZxZE90Qmt5SW1rWjFYc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHodH7C3YwV4A9dX-CH2Z2Jj5l8nG6LNOwWm-gpTBR1XZSdAK7wnKsHh8i_Bz_aem_3DXpBuCq94Bq5t0RlxOAAw&brid=vtG-sZYHjqjZJDPVx3_HBQ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/stories/highlights/17912881713231859/

Thugs pull a 67 year old white suburban guy out of his car, break his ribs and nearly choke him to death for no reason. If this can happen to him, it can happen to you.

[Anonymous]

Good, the president is doing the right thing. Love the proud president of USA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Body-camera video appears to contradict the government’s claim that Marimar Martinez, 30, drove toward officers before one of them opened fire at her late Saturday morning in Brighton Park, her attorney claimed.


https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2025/10/06/marimar-martinez-anthony-ian-santos-ruiz-border-patrol-shooting-brighton-park


US taxpayers will be paying off claims against ICE for decades.

She rammed their car.

Nope. Apparently the video shows that ICE rammed her, not the other way around.

Parente said the video shows an agent turn a federal vehicle left into Martinez’s vehicle, after which an agent says, “Do something b----.” The agent then exits the vehicle and shoots at Martinez.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Body-camera video appears to contradict the government’s claim that Marimar Martinez, 30, drove toward officers before one of them opened fire at her late Saturday morning in Brighton Park, her attorney claimed.


https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2025/10/06/marimar-martinez-anthony-ian-santos-ruiz-border-patrol-shooting-brighton-park


US taxpayers will be paying off claims against ICE for decades.

She rammed their car.

No she absolutely did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bovino was just orded to report into court DAILY because he and his agents were consistently breaking court orders.

DHS has zero credibility. They continue to lie and flout the law and I'm glad that this judge is paying attention.

Chicago does not back down without a fight.

Another ridiculous, out of control judge. She is about to get slapped down hard.

Yep. And she did get slapped down.

To summarize:


Last year, Ellis entered orders not just prohibiting ALL law enforcement officers in northern Illinois from using certain tools to fend off ICE demonstrators but also forced DHS chief Greg Bovino to essentially check in with her on a daily basis.

In a 2-1 panel decision yesterday (h/t Jonathan Turley), the court minced no words. The same appellate court had already stepped in last year and put a hold on her injunction and its terms.

Judges Brennan (chief judge) and Scudder lambasted Ellis for violating court rules; refusing to consider Article III standing; expanding the area in question (Broadview ICE facility) in the complaint; and ignoring requests by the plaintiffs' dismissal motion in a way that "risks spawning serious legal consequences if it is not vacated."

"This case involved extraordinary circumstances. Working on a highly compressed timeline, the district court granted an overbroad, constitutionally suspect injunction."

The panel also took aim at Ellis' egregious demands of Greg Bovino:

"It puts the court in the position of an inquisitor rather than that of a neutral adjudicator of the parties’ adversarial presentations. Second, it sets the court up as a supervisor of Chief Bovino’s activities, intruding into personnel management decisions of the Executive Branch. These two problems are related and lead us to conclude that the order infringes on the separation of powers."

More from the 7th Circuit as to the plaintiffs' move to dismiss the case pending appeal since most ICE activity had halted by then:

"At first, the district court followed the Rule 23 procedures. It conducted the necessary hearing and provided four weeks for any objectors to make their concerns known. No members of the certified class objected to the plaintiffs’ proposal to dis miss the case with prejudice.1 And the government did not oppose the motion to dismiss. At the final hearing, the district court dismissed the case. In doing so, the court deviated from Rule 23 and the plaintiffs’ motion. It sua sponte de-certified the class. Then the court dismissed the case without prejudice—even though plaintiffs had asked for dismissal with prejudice."

In other words--Ellis violated federal rules and on her own (sua sponte) in decertifying the class of plaintiffs in an apparent backdoor move to keep the case alive, hence "without prejudice."

Back to Ellis' original injunction:

"The court’s injunction also impermissibly infringes on separation of powers principles. It effectively established the district court as the supervisor of all Executive Branch activity in the city of Chicago—a role another federal court of appeals has found problematic." (The 8th Circuit.)