I know a handful of kids who have started immersion in later grades (4th and 5th), specifically at Stokes, that have done fine and have gone on to DCI. I am confident OP’s child will be okay. It is a very supportive school |
And here I assumed that if someone is moving to DC for 4th grade and enters the lottery for Stokes or another dual-language program, the child has had enough exposure to the target language that they're not going to be utterly lost. |
This last part is important. People who go there want to be there. Just because people in $2M houses across the street don't like it and are actively trying to scare you away (and clearly $$ doesn't equal smarts. if you don't like the Title I aspect, then stop trashing it. the school isn't going away, people, maybe try to make it better?), doesn't mean it is not worth the commute. We live in Hill East--the commute is tough, but it is doable. |
Then the Spanish must be pretty weak and English is used also because the kid would be totally lost at our school |
DCI at least has different levels of language tracks. Maybe some of its feeders do too. |
Hi OP, I would definitely recommend transferring to the EE campus. Is your child in the French or Spanish track? I only ask because I know many of the rising kids in the 4th grade French class and it's a great group. I wish you all the luck; let us know what you figure out! |
Nope, none. |
You would think but OP has made some very poor choices without researching logistics so……….. |
Probably not. People, especially children, pick up language very quickly in immersive settings. You might be surprised. |
Charter schools are required to accept anyone who gets a spot off the waiting list. They aren't allowed to ask about language proficiency, IEP status, or anything else. So they have to give support. |
That sounds like a recipe for disaster actually. |
+1. |
Sure. They can help support what they can but no amount of money and support is going to make an 8 or 9 year old succeed in doing well when in an immersion setting when the other kids have had 6-7 years of true immersion. If you think otherwise then you are wrong. Unless of course the program is super weak and it’s not really true immersion standards or expectations. |
It seems to work ok for most immigrant kids who enroll in English speaking schools with ESL support, especially if they have a strong educational background in their primary language. |
I was an immigrant kid and that is totally different. You are immersed in english everywhere around you - school, stores, TV, music, etc…It’s constant 24/7 because you are living in the country that speaks the language you are learning. You are immersed 24/7. Plus these kids are usually younger that start like 3-6. You can still pick it up like my cousin who came over older but not as good in tone, writing, etc.. Immersion for a few hours in school and that it is, above ain’t happening. Kids will not pick it up easily when it’s english at home and everywhere. |