Is Emory a Top Choice For Anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.

how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce

Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.

Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.

https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6

You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.

Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.

You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth

What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"

… who has been preapproved….

where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply

and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.

[Anonymous]

Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.

how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce

Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.

Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.

https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6

You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.

Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.

You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth

What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"

… who has been preapproved….

where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply

and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.

Preapproval does not mean a hard cutoff. For URM that stats is qualifying for medical school.

At WashU they do weed out premed students. Your table shows there are only 200+ applicants per year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.

how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce

Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.

Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.

https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6

You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.

Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.

You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth

What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"

… who has been preapproved….

where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply

and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.

Preapproval does not mean a hard cutoff. For URM that stats is qualifying for medical school.

At WashU they do weed out premed students. Your table shows there are only 200+ applicants per year.

He was white. Not sure what you mean by weedout. if you mean classes being difficult sure, but that happens at every school. It certainly isn't happening at the application stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

Yes WashU has poor IB placement, at least Rice and Vady have an excuse because they dont have bba programs. WashU mba program is also pitiful.

[Anonymous]

Emory was a top choice for my kid who wanted a school that was Southern, urban, liberal, diverse and medium-sized. Not many places check off all these boxes.

[Anonymous]

If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.

This thread is the Trumpification of America. So sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.

how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce

Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.

Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.

https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6

You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.

Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.

You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth

What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"

… who has been preapproved….

where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply

and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.

Preapproval does not mean a hard cutoff. For URM that stats is qualifying for medical school.

At WashU they do weed out premed students. Your table shows there are only 200+ applicants per year.

He was white. Not sure what you mean by weedout. if you mean classes being difficult sure, but that happens at every school. It certainly isn't happening at the application stage.

Emory has 1.5 times of medical school applicants than WashU. Enough said.

Just follow the simple logic, and you will be fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?

Selectivity is on par with any other too 20 school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
ND has been a solid T20 forever. Emory not.

Actually, Emory was ranked higher than Notre Dame by US News almost every year until 2011. Odd definition of “forever.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?

Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?

Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.

LOL No.

Class of 2029:
Emory acceptance rate with gaming: 15%
Washu < 12%
Notre Dame 9%
Georgetown: 12%
USC: 10.4%

Nice try with this pathetic garbage

[Anonymous]

Source:

https://www.ivywise.com/blog/college-admission-rates/

Emory is and always will be second tier compared to the actual top schools let alone mid tier schools like Umich and Georgetown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.

So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?

Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.

LOL No.

Class of 2029:
Emory acceptance rate with gaming: 15%
Washu < 12%
Notre Dame 9%
Georgetown: 12%
USC: 10.4%

Nice try with this pathetic garbage

You're adding Oxford, Emory is 10% and I was talking about test scores. Emory has higher test scores or in the case of WashU more students submitting. You're a one man army against Emory. You're the pathetic one.