So… Tucker Carlson just ended Ted Cruz’s career

[Anonymous]

A wife and kids means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A wife and kids means nothing.

This seems like a major dig at Sen Graham

[Anonymous]

It’s the “92 million.” affect in Tucker’s response that kills me.

Ted is done-zo as a serious person, if he ever was considered one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wife and kids means nothing.

This seems like a major dig at Sen Graham

Speaker Johnson, Scott, Cruz, Cotton, Rubio, Hawley…?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Think. Who will benefit from this war?
The military-industrial complex, that's who.
Cruz is not bought by Israel, he's bought by corporate warmonger interests who love Israel's spending on arms mostly paid for by the United States.

Nope. It’s Zionist billionaires and AIPAC. Nice try, though.

Can everyone start using more words and remove "Zionist" from their vocabulary? Not the slur you think it is.

[Anonymous]

I am in Texas. His seat is very safe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in Texas. His seat is very safe.

Which is sad...he likes porn tweets, talks about the "basketball ring" and jets off to Cancun when his constituents need him the most. I'm not sure if I've seen a less authentic politician.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in Texas. His seat is very safe.

Which is sad...he likes porn tweets, talks about the "basketball ring" and jets off to Cancun when his constituents need him the most. I'm not sure if I've seen a less authentic politician.

He is terrible. But his seat is safe because he won't get a legit primary due to the billionaires who support him.

[Anonymous]

This was so obviously fake & then astroturfed everywhere to give Carlson anti-war bonafides before the war broke out. As the PPs above note, Cruz can’t and won’t be voted out. It doesn’t matter what he says, his very top priority is to be a shameless AIPAC slave. Swap Cruz out and the next man or woman will also……be an AIPAC slave. The point of this going viral days before an imminent war was make Carlson THE anti-war gatekeeper. Controlling all sides is what intelligence, neocons and AIPAC are after.

[Anonymous]

Among others, one of Tucker’s puppetmasters is Israeli Yoram Hazony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't finished the interview yet. But here's my issue. He brings up that Iran is actively trying to kill Pompeo, Bolton, and Hook. Yet, Trump had their security details pulled. Cruz made a comment that during the Biden administration, the government was spending- I think he said $2M a month?- to protect these three from serious threats to their lives from Iranian assassins.

If you believed that Iranians were trying to assassinate them for work they did under Trump's first term, why pull their security? If the answer is out of spite (he accused them of disloyalty, against all evidence) then it means that they are okay facilitating Iranian assassinations. Is that okay? And if it is, then lets drop this argument that the existence of Iranian assassins targeting government people is a reason to attack Iran. It wasn't even reason enough to defend our officials that carried out the Iran policy during Trump 1.

The interview is full of outright contradictions like this. It's a master class in demonstrating the complete and total lack of seriousness of some of our most powerful leaders. By any standard, Cruz should be one of our most serious statesman - Princeton, Harvard, clerked for Rehnquist. What an embarrassment.

Ted Cruz is on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism. He ought to know the Iran issue inside and out, as well as Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yes exactly. I'm quite warm to a "peace through strength" approach to foreign policy and I do agree that Iran is a terrible threat to our national security. And I'm a Trump voter. However, that doesn't mean that I will get on board with every war against Iran that we are invited to, especially since we (the US) literally change our policy on Iran every 2-4 years. Every 2-4 years, we literally completely reverse our policy. That's insane and it suggests that we are too incompetent on this issue to manage a war responsibility.

The Pompeo/Bolton/Hook contradiction is really a deal breaker for me. If its true that they are being targeted for assassinations, then we won't spend a couple million to defend them on our own soil-- but we will launch a war because of it? But, wait, I thought (per the President's tweet) this security was unnecessary. Which one is it? Because, America First. I believe in that. We defend our people. And if we aren't doing that, it raises broader questions about the focus and discipline of the foreign policy wing of this administration.

I’d like to hear an update from this poster tonight.

[Anonymous]

Tucker worked very hard and took a lot of money to help Trump win and help the GOP win control of congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in Texas. His seat is very safe.

Weak minded Texans. The man admitted on tape that his primary reason for becoming a senator was to protect Israel, not Texas. He has lived up to his claim as Texans are an afterthought

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

We all know that little b1 tch Tucker learned that fact about a minute before he rolled tape. And nobody in the US (except for about 36 people in DC) knew the pop either.