that the employee cost share is actually less than 17% |
And now the last two parents are going crazy because MCPS doesn't have the money or the teachers to bring back the failed program. |
Stop making up non-sense. |
Many of the kids didn't return, which makes up part of the kids leaving MCPS. Be thankful you or your child doesn't have health issues. Maybe if you'd be more cautious, their kids could return. |
|
On no. MCPS is funding the failed program. It is called MCPS. Taylor is going to offer a money back guarantee if your child can’t read or do math in 10 years! What a deal! |
Clearly you have never been in a school before. This is life and the MVA was an added layer. |
MCPS got burned on the unexpected costs last year and they must not have confidence in the consultant's predictive ability for the coming year. |
Uh no, from the sessions I've watched they seem pretty confident the premiums aren't covering costs. |
+1. They know premiums are not covering cost and that the employer share is too high. I think it was over 80%. |
Let's see...how many BOE members owe their victories to the union? |
So, they keep failing kids in MCPS as they aren’t willing to actually educate kids and expect Mc to fix it? Too little too late. |
The school has higher test scores than some in person. By your logic all underperforming schools should be closed. What is your obsession? |
What’s yours? MVA didn’t exist prior to the pandemic and no promised it would exist forever following said pandemic. There is not enough medically frail students to make it fiscally viable without it serving other student needs. And in that case it would need to include other teachers for select periods. |
That's why a state program would work better than a district-level program. Even then it might not have enough students, so states may need to partner on such a program. |