flashy - big hair - lots of designer duds head to toe - very Nuevo riche - think stereotypical Texas and complete opposite of elite northeastern old money |
Rank (Total) Institution #Employed Top Employer (Total) Top Employer (Share)
1 University of Pennsylvania 408 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 2 New York University 257 JP Morgan Guggenheim Partners 3 Cornell University 214 JP Morgan Guggenheim Partners 4 University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 213 Jefferies PJT Partners 5 Columbia University 177 Goldman Sachs Morgan Stanley 6 Harvard University 175 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 6 University of Chicago 175 Morgan Stanley Credit Suisse 8 Georgetown University 162 Bank of America Centerview Partners 9 University of Southern California 149 JP Morgan Perella Weinberg Partners 10 University of Texas at Austin 147 Moelis & Company Greenhill & Co. 11 University of California, Berkeley 143 Goldman Sachs Credit Suisse 12 University of Notre Dame 129 Bank of America Evercore 13 University of Virginia 122 Jefferies Guggenheim Partners 14 Duke University 121 Goldman Sachs Perella Weinberg Partners 15 Yale University 103 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 16 Dartmouth College 98 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 16 Boston College 98 Citi Barclays 18 Princeton University 92 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 19 Brown University 89 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 20 Northwestern University 88 Bank of America Greenhill & Co. 21 University of California, Los Angeles 84 Citi PJT Partners 22 Emory University 77 Citi Evercore 23 Vanderbilt University 73 Bank of America PJT Partners 24 Stanford University 67 Goldman Sachs Centerview Partners 25 Washington University 65 Guggenheim Partners Perella Weinberg Partners 26 Southern Methodist University 60 Jefferies Moelis & Company 27 Middlebury College 56 Goldman Sachs Barclays 28 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 50 Bank of America JP Morgan 29 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 49 Goldman Sachs Perella Weinberg Partners 30 Willams College 48 Guggenheim Partners Barclays |
lol it’s not the 90s, big hair lol. But yes new-rich vibes. The kids are very good looking. And southern- during football game days, the girls march over to the field, in skirts with white cowboy boots. |
Thank you for this list, I will make sure my kids don’t apply to any of these schools. |
We already see this, I think particularly so in the non-profit sector, where few execs have actually struggled. |
Really? I'm from Colorado (a town that borders Boulder, actually) and that's not my experience at all. It's true that there's a large contingent of normal middle class Colorado kids, but the out of state crowd, which is about half of the student body, most certainly gives "rich AF coming to ski and/or party in Boulder" vibes. (Years ago legalized weed was a big draw too, but that's obviously less so now as more states have legalized.) And CU Boulder is pretty easy to get into, so many students are a particularly ...notable...combination of rich + not overly academic. |
With the exception of Wake Forest, all of these schools have roughly the same percent of students on Pell Grants... Amherst - 21% USC - 21% Williams - 20% Middlebury - 19% Colorado College - 19% NYU - 18% Dartmouth - 17% Bowdoin - 16% |
Facts. |
If op had only used Google, The NY Times already has put this list together:
38 colleges had more students from the top 1 percent than the bottom 60 percent STUDENTS FROM ... THE TOP 1% ($630K+) BOTTOM 60% (<$65K) 1. Washington University in St. Louis 21.7 6.1 2. Colorado College 24.2 10.5 3. Washington and Lee University 19.1 8.4 4. Colby College 20.4 11.1 5. Trinity College (Conn.) 26.2 14.3 6. Bucknell University 20.4 12.2 7. Colgate University 22.6 13.6 8. Kenyon College 19.8 12.2 9. Middlebury College 22.8 14.2 10. Tufts University 18.6 11.8 |
NESCAC schools recruit from NE boarding schools, so I'm going with the NESCAC. |
Pepperdine
DePauw (not DePaul) |
USD - University of San Diego/Univ of Spoiled Daughters |
That article was written in 2017, and per the study, "The researchers tracked about 30 million students born between 1980 and 1991." So those were people who were in college (roughly) between 1998-2013. That's a loooong time ago - heck, some of the people in that study are likely to be *parents* of college students (or high schoolers in their college search). A LOT has changed in the higher education landscape, I don't think that study is particularly relevant for the current crop of college students who weren't even born for a good chunk of the data collectoin period. |
Surprised by Stanford |
Some of these schools are much smaller than others—so “total number” is not straightforward |