Former Trump Chief of Staff Kelly Warns Trump would Rule as a dictator

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

This woman is not an impartial voice. She is a leading never Trumper.

Why do we have to believe his motive for stating this is pure? He didn’t offer anything but his personal opinion. He provided no concrete evidence of Trump planning a fascist government or dictatorship. He hasn’t even spoken to him recently.

I personally believe he is part of a hit job by the Harris campaign and their liberal media allies. They know Kamala is losing the election, so the campaign and its media allies have launched incessant personal attack against President Trump.

Do you honestly believe that Trump is running on behalf of the country? He’s a crazy 78-year old man who only cares about himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe General Kelly - he was part of Trump's "inner circle" and worked directly for him and knows him much better than anyone on this thread.

Our friends and closest colleagues usually say nice things about us and it's not that compelling because it's in their own personal interest to do so. But when a close colleague or friend says something negative, that puts them at risk, it's brave and more credible. Kelly has nothing to personally gain from this. He is a Republican who used to believe in Trump - until he worked closely with him and saw him for who he is.

Not just his former chief of staff but also Trump's own VP is not endorsing him. When has that ever happened before in US history?

Fox News had the exclusive on that and has mentioned it like once ever since.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

She forgot one:

“America’s Hitler and a moral disaster.”
—JD Vance before his lips got stuck on Trump’s @ss

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

This woman is not an impartial voice. She is a leading never Trumper.

Why do we have to believe his motive for stating this is pure? He didn’t offer anything but his personal opinion. He provided no concrete evidence of Trump planning a fascist government or dictatorship. He hasn’t even spoken to him recently.

I personally believe he is part of a hit job by the Harris campaign and their liberal media allies. They know Kamala is losing the election, so the campaign and its media allies have launched incessant personal attack against President Trump.

It pains me to say this because I heard she used to work for Santorum but Longwell is one of the smartest people in today’s politics because she literally listens to voters in focus groups all day long as a big part of her job. And everything she listed are direct quotes from Kelly and a dozen others who worked for Trump. This is not a her problem, or a Jelly problem. It’s a Trump problem.

[Anonymous]

Trump has been consistently a Hitler fan for decades. This isn't a new thing. Here's an article from 1990s sharing he kept a book of Hitler's speeches by his bedside table:

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1990/08/09/Repor...dside/6398650174400/

The article said wife Ivana Trump has told her attorney, Michael Kennedy, that 'from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler's collected speeches, 'My New Order,' which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed.'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

She forgot one:

“America’s Hitler and a moral disaster.”
—JD Vance before his lips got stuck on Trump’s @ss

She forgot this one, too:

If the former president “hasn’t committed indictable offenses, I don’t know what one is.”
“I just hope that he’ll have to pay a price for it [Jan. 6].”
—Mitch McConnell

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Believe General Kelly - he was part of Trump's "inner circle" and worked directly for him and knows him much better than anyone on this thread.

Our friends and closest colleagues usually say nice things about us and it's not that compelling because it's in their own personal interest to do so. But when a close colleague or friend says something negative, that puts them at risk, it's brave and more credible. Kelly has nothing to personally gain from this. He is a Republican who used to believe in Trump - until he worked closely with him and saw him for who he is.[/quote]

Kelly knows firsthand the dangers of a Trump presidency. Listen to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe General Kelly - he was part of Trump's "inner circle" and worked directly for him and knows him much better than anyone on this thread.

Our friends and closest colleagues usually say nice things about us and it's not that compelling because it's in their own personal interest to do so. But when a close colleague or friend says something negative, that puts them at risk, it's brave and more credible. Kelly has nothing to personally gain from this. He is a Republican who used to believe in Trump - until he worked closely with him and saw him for who he is.

+1

Kelly expected Trump or any president for that matter to be deferential to him rather than the other way around. Also, this episode bothered him so much he waited 4 years and two weeks before the election to get it off his chest?

A) Kelly expected Trump to be deferential to the Constitution and the rule of law, not to him.
B) Kelly has been talking about this for years - to Goldberg and Schmidt and others - but didn’t go on the record until now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe General Kelly - he was part of Trump's "inner circle" and worked directly for him and knows him much better than anyone on this thread.

Our friends and closest colleagues usually say nice things about us and it's not that compelling because it's in their own personal interest to do so. But when a close colleague or friend says something negative, that puts them at risk, it's brave and more credible. Kelly has nothing to personally gain from this. He is a Republican who used to believe in Trump - until he worked closely with him and saw him for who he is.

+1

Kelly expected Trump or any president for that matter to be deferential to him rather than the other way around. Also, this episode bothered him so much he waited 4 years and two weeks before the election to get it off his chest?

A) Kelly expected Trump to be deferential to the Constitution and the rule of law, not to him.
B) Kelly has been talking about this for years - to Goldberg and Schmidt and others - but didn’t go on the record until now.

+1

[Anonymous]

just getting caught up on the audio interview with general kelly and yikes this is a terrible indictment of trump.

kelly's criticism of trump is not just saying he no longer likes him or thinks he is a good leader. he is saying trump is not a patriot, and will be as bad as hitler. kelly was trump's actual chief of staff came for years and worked more closely with him than anyone else in trump's admin.

yikes on bikes this is as bad as it gets, and scary about trump!

[Anonymous]

Anyone who knows or has worked with 3 and 4-star generals, like these men, know they are not prone to hyperbole. They are calm, measured people, who speak carefully and factually.

Nothing - except maybe the Helsinki news conference - has worried me as much as these comments by Kelly, Mattis and Milley. I hope they remember their oath to the Constitution to defend it against ALL enemies (including domestic) and speak publicly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

This woman is not an impartial voice. She is a leading never Trumper.

Why do we have to believe his motive for stating this is pure? He didn’t offer anything but his personal opinion. He provided no concrete evidence of Trump planning a fascist government or dictatorship. He hasn’t even spoken to him recently.

I personally believe he is part of a hit job by the Harris campaign and their liberal media allies. They know Kamala is losing the election, so the campaign and its media allies have launched incessant personal attack against President Trump.

You ignore that the thread is nothing more than quotes from the people who worked closest with trump during his Administration. Unless you are falsely asserting that she conjured the quotes out of thin air, the ire is misplaced. She is just the messenger. So please tell us, do you think all of these people who were at the very top of the Trump administration are all lying? Or, perhaps do you think Trump, instead, has a serious problem that voters should know about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who knows or has worked with 3 and 4-star generals, like these men, know they are not prone to hyperbole. They are calm, measured people, who speak carefully and factually.

Nothing - except maybe the Helsinki news conference - has worried me as much as these comments by Kelly, Mattis and Milley. I hope they remember their oath to the Constitution to defend it against ALL enemies (including domestic) and speak publicly.

Yes, you nailed it.

Trump voters at least please listen to Kelly's interview, read Mattis and Milley's comments and reflect for a few minutes prior to voting. If you are still a Republican, you can still save your party by ending Trump's hijacking of it. There's a home for you in Harris' big tent. And if after listening to the interview and reading these generals' remarks, you are still a proud American who loves our democracy and our country, you won't be able to vote for Trump. It just doesn't add up. Listen to these Republican Generals at least before deciding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread - please share it

This woman is not an impartial voice. She is a leading never Trumper.

Why do we have to believe his motive for stating this is pure? He didn’t offer anything but his personal opinion. He provided no concrete evidence of Trump planning a fascist government or dictatorship. He hasn’t even spoken to him recently.

I personally believe he is part of a hit job by the Harris campaign and their liberal media allies. They know Kamala is losing the election, so the campaign and its media allies have launched incessant personal attack against President Trump.

LOL. Clearly you didn't read it. Every tweet is a quote from someone in the administration saying how dangerous he is.

I know Trumpsters are allergic to facts and data and statements that skewer your dear leader. But, why do you need evidence from him that Trump said it when Trump himself said he wants to be a dictator on day one? If you want "proof" that Trump is dangerous, here is a catalog of all the times he's praised dictators (from Putin, to Xi, to Erdoğan, to Orban):

<iframe src='//players.brightcove.net/1155968...meborder=0></iframe>

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Believe General Kelly - he was part of Trump's "inner circle" and worked directly for him and knows him much better than anyone on this thread.

Our friends and closest colleagues usually say nice things about us and it's not that compelling because it's in their own personal interest to do so. But when a close colleague or friend says something negative, that puts them at risk, it's brave and more credible. Kelly has nothing to personally gain from this. He is a Republican who used to believe in Trump - until he worked closely with him and saw him for who he is.

+1

Kelly expected Trump or any president for that matter to be deferential to him rather than the other way around. Also, this episode bothered him so much he waited 4 years and two weeks before the election to get it off his chest?

A) Kelly expected Trump to be deferential to the Constitution and the rule of law, not to him.
B) Kelly has been talking about this for years - to Goldberg and Schmidt and others - but didn’t go on the record until now.

Hw came out two weeks before an election, while people are already voting, in order to attempt to swing the election against a former boss he dislikes.