You got me. I entered DCUM’s religion forum where a thread on Dawkins was at the top. I read OP’s summary of what Dawkins said, as quoted by Focus. I didn’t click though (bad idea to click on random links). I’m willing to bet 99% of the other posters here did the same thing. If you see some massive conspiracy in that, or some unhealthy obsession with Dawkins—that’s on you. |
I hate to break this to you, but not everything posted on DCUM is about you. And hopefully you don’t get most of your “news” from DCUM. |
Lame. You lost the argument so you post abuse. Better not to post anything at all. Unless you’re a religious troll trying to make atheists look bad. |
Clearly, the comment wasn’t directed at PP if he’s not starting threads about Dawkins or complaining that he’s “too loud” and covered often in the news. |
Google Dawkins and cultural Christian; mainly religious news and media outlets are discussing the interview he gave and his comments. For some reason, mainstream media doesn’t seem interested in Dawkins telling the interviewer he likes living in a Christian society and would choose to live in a Christian society.
I think it’s also quite ironic that the man who ran the Dawkins website in the US, designed the red atheist logo, created the videos in which Hawkins attempts to discredit the existence of God, and was so close to Dawkins that Dawkins dedicated one of his books to him, now is Christian. That’s not in the media either, oddly. For some mysterious reason we may never understand, msm doesn’t get all chatty about atheists converting to Christianity. |
You hounded pp for his own sources. When you didn’t like his answer, you abused him. Such bad faith. Atheists get a bad rap because of behavior like this. |
You can search the New York Times for their coverage of Richard Dawkins. Link: https://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/richard-dawkins You can search the Guardian for their coverage of RD. Link: https://www.theguardian.com/science/dawkins Casually perusing one cannot see any stories at either link about Dawkins interview from 1 April 2024. Both media outlets have discussed Dawkins and his views, his books, his tours, his predictions for the future, etc. |
The answer is that we all clicked on OP’s link and none of us are following Dawkins obsessively like someone here keeps claiming. This is such a pointless derailment. Can we get back to discussing what Dawkins actually said in the link. |
Because that’s not actually newsworthy. Russell Brand is a celebrity and might get more press. But some random guy? No one cares. Except OP. |
More projection. If that’s the same PP as before then they must get their “news” from DCUM. So then they only hear about Dawkins a lot because some believers post about him often. Ok. So going forward, I’m going to judge all Christians based on Russell Brand’s behavior. He’s your representative now. Good luck with that. |
You’re proving my point. The only recent mention in the NYT was a couple of years ago, with a couple sentences that he coined the term “meme”. He’s not newsworthy. |
ZOMG. You repeatedly and shrilly accused everybody here of reading Focus on the Family and Fox. When we all ignored your attempted derailment, you accused us of trolling. A single poster finally answered you and (successfully) proved that no, they don't read either Fox or FotF. So now you're hounding that single poster - for pages! over two different threads! - about The Guardian's coverage. Newsflash: yes, we all clicked on OP's link, and that's why we know what Dawkins said 2 days ago. End of Story. Finished. Done. This is pathological. Get help. |
Why are you confusing the Russell Brand thread with this one? |
Bring it up with him. He’s your representative now. |
There have been multiple posters claiming that this was covered in normal media. It’s not. Because it’s not newsworthy. Except to OP and the other believers who post often about Dawkins. |