Franconia SB Candidate St. John-Cunning disqualified

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What makes her stand out ?

She has really obnoxious partisan supporters. Maybe she's less obnoxious than her supporters? I certainly hope so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is back on the ballot

That’s good! Wonder what happens to the write-ins? It’s probably not too many at least since this remedy came quickly.

That's the new question

[Anonymous]

because John-cunning is stupid and incompetent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

The Democrats running and serving on the School Board are always willing to throw county employees (here, a registrar) under the bus to excuse their own incompetence. Why should this time be any different?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

[Anonymous]

Democrat Tammy Derenak-Kaufax sat by while Lee\Lewis rotted and now people want to continue much of the same with another Democrat endorsed school board member? You deserve what you get.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

A right wing judge who used to work for the NRA. Then a better judge gave a better ruling.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrat Tammy Derenak-Kaufax sat by while Lee\Lewis rotted and now people want to continue much of the same with another Democrat endorsed school board member? You deserve what you get.

Tammy always seemed like she was wearing contacts that were bothering her or something…not quite all there. And now the local Democrats offer up Marcia, who can’t even manage to fill out her address correctly? This is not progress, folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

It was a right-wing judge who used to work for the NRA who delivered a bad ruling on a suit brought by the Republicans.

Then a better judge gave a different decision yesterday and admit signatures the office of elections refused to accept.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

It was a right-wing judge who used to work for the NRA who delivered a bad ruling on a suit brought by the Republicans.

Then a better judge gave a different decision yesterday and admit signatures the office of elections refused to accept.

Can you knock off your partisan court bashing? It is unhelpful and contributes to the degradation of our civil society. It's wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

It was a right-wing judge who used to work for the NRA who delivered a bad ruling on a suit brought by the Republicans.

Then a better judge gave a different decision yesterday and admit signatures the office of elections refused to accept.

These are the supporters that make me vote for the other guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Either way it’s good that folks were put on notice that she’s not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

She did everything correctly. This whole thing was the fault of the registrar.

Sure. No one else got tripped up by the registrar. Only her, and her buddy. Hmm.

Nobody else had lawsuits filed. The GOP only targeted her.

Was she targeted by an election official who was in cahoots with the local gop? She’s the only one who has this problem.

It was a right-wing judge who used to work for the NRA who delivered a bad ruling on a suit brought by the Republicans.

Then a better judge gave a different decision yesterday and admit signatures the office of elections refused to accept.

These are the supporters that make me vote for the other guy.

“The judge is only good if they rule in my favor.”

What a profound misunderstanding of the role of the judiciary on the part of local Democrats and one more reason to vote for Pinkney.

[Anonymous]

The only thing that’s wrong is a right wing judge kicking someone off the ballot for the registrar’s mistakes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only thing that’s wrong is a right wing judge kicking someone off the ballot for the registrar’s mistakes

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing that’s wrong is a right wing judge kicking someone off the ballot for the registrar’s mistakes

+1.

So who is going after the election officials for trying to wrongfully disenfranchise a candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only thing that’s wrong is a right wing judge kicking someone off the ballot for the registrar’s mistakes

I know, right? A judge, following the law! That's wrong!!!