That labor often doesn’t get paid well. And that ‘labor’ often gets treated very poorly. Same story in India. Not a very robust OSHA to be found in China. Workers are seen as dispensable. As we saw what happened in Qatar. |
Same here. Especially for women. And even more so for women of color. |
Republicans controlled at least one house of Congress, if not both, during both administrations. For at least the least 30 years the Republican Party has campaigned on reducing domestic spending and taxes. |
NP. I agree on all your points except the part about “defending the freaking world”. Seriously? That’s what we were doing in Vietnam? Iraq? Afghanistan? |
The US might take more immigrants in absolute terms but not in % terms. And for a large country, you don't take many refugees. |
Really? You don't think Canada, Australia or New Zealand might be better? |
It's not official but that's who most of the immigrants coming from the southern border are, legal or illegal, asylum seekers or "just" economic workers. |
https://www.pwc.ro/en/press-room/press-release-2020/the-total-number-of-cars-in-use-in-europe-will-decline-by-2025--.html |
| Pork, the mob, Davis-Bacon. We get nothing but money for Dems out of our infrastructure spending. |
Huh. When I come back from a trip like that I thank whatever gods there are that I live here. |
PP here. Funny how all of you who claim to value diversity immediately jump to assuming a reference to racial homogeneity is necessarily meant to be positive. OP is the one claiming Japanese society is superior. I personally don’t homogeneity should be the goal and prefer the American approach. The Japanese pressure to conform, like the technology, is probably necessary for a society trying to cram that many people into such a small area, but I would find it stultifying and, in the long term, counterproductive. Japanese society is dying. Literally. If not for immigration, the US would be heading in the same direction. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/japan-births-new-low-population-shrinks-ages-94078296 And, duh, the challenge of density is the point. In the US, we have lots of space (even in our relatively dense areas) so we don’t have to redevelop the old. There’s plenty of space, so we spread out and build new. No one wants to live near the rail road tracks. In Japan real estate is too valuable to waste, so even the less desirable areas get rebuilt. Not to mention that, in Japan, houses are effectively disposable. They don’t build a house expecting it to last for multiple owners over centuries. A house is considered to be worthless after 20-30 years. Think about what an incredible waste of resources that is. Those shiny new houses may look nice, but they’re the ultimate token of a disposable, consumerist society. Give me a slightly shabby, well-built 19th Century house any day. https://www.archdaily.com/980830/built-to-not-last-the-japanese-trend-of-replacing-homes-every-30-years |
You’re not supposed to say Third World Country anymore. Ridiculous but true. The liberal censors will take you down for that |
I had to LOL at OP thinking that seeing zero homeless people is a good thing. Does OP think these societies don’t have mentally ill people or drug users? What does OP think these countries do with these people? I’m not a fan of the US approach that basically makes the commitment of mentally ill impossible, but liberals praising the end result of what are seriously oppressive societies with regard to mental health is always astounding. (See, also, immigration) Japan claims to have a very low rate of mental illness, but has the highest number of people hospitalized with mental illness in the world, and almost no diagnosed depression, but the highest suicide rate in the OECD. Japan is probably 75 years behind the US with regard to the societal understanding of, and compassion of, mental illness. |
| You people saying the US has given up on development and infrastructure need to get out more. You’re spending too much time in the Northeast. Head South and West, my friends. |
Agree. OP sounds naive. |