MD State Cup Scores?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Got to GotSoccer.com.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?


If they are in ECNL, you can look. Otherwise, got soccer is usually not updated at least for the younger age groups.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PPA 09 girls won. Don't know scores.

2-1 PPA

06 Potomac boys 2-1
07 Liverpool 0-1 over SAC
08 Matrix beat Potomac
04 potomac boys won in the last minute on header over brasusa

Very fun and hot day to watch the games.


My hat is off to anyone who stayed to watch multiple games in that heat!


three of the games were at the same time. But still fun to watch, especially since this is the first time we have been at the soccerplex.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?



Why not?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?



Why not?


They should not even post rosters on gotsoccer till kids are in HS. Really no reason to have them listed at all in my opinion. Just promotes people trying to see a roster and poach a kid to their team.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?



Why not?


They should not even post rosters on gotsoccer till kids are in HS. Really no reason to have them listed at all in my opinion. Just promotes people trying to see a roster and poach a kid to their team.


Also they are minors - particularly not great to spread names of 11-13 year olds. Or younger!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is there any way to see rosters for the teams?


Why?



Why not?


They should not even post rosters on gotsoccer till kids are in HS. Really no reason to have them listed at all in my opinion. Just promotes people trying to see a roster and poach a kid to their team.


Also they are minors - particularly not great to spread names of 11-13 year olds. Or younger!


Exactly- it is why our club does not put them on gotsoccer till after u16 age. Again- not even necessary then.
Anonymous
LOL. Roster poster is crazy and creepy. You want to see the names of a bunch of 11 or 12 year old kids for what purpose?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U12 boys Bethesda lost to PPA. 6-1.


Troll post. 2009 PPA Boys won 3-1. They also won the 2009 girls, 2-1. Hats off for beating Bethesda in both however.

Watched both games. PPA had a stronger performance in the Boys game. It wasn't dominant but was much much stronger. The PPA girls on the other hand were dominated by Bethesda possession. Just one of those games where the few shots that were had, a couple went in. Both teams should have played out of the back more as they just punted to each often.

Boys game was much more fun to watch. Both teams played out of the back.

Supposedly one of the best games was the 2008 FC Frederick Girls vs. MD Rush. I think it was 3-3, went through over time where Rush won on PKs.


NOT a troll post. MD State Cup website has 2009 PPA Boys winning 6-1 and Girls winning 2-0.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U12 boys Bethesda lost to PPA. 6-1.


Troll post. 2009 PPA Boys won 3-1. They also won the 2009 girls, 2-1. Hats off for beating Bethesda in both however.

Watched both games. PPA had a stronger performance in the Boys game. It wasn't dominant but was much much stronger. The PPA girls on the other hand were dominated by Bethesda possession. Just one of those games where the few shots that were had, a couple went in. Both teams should have played out of the back more as they just punted to each often.

Boys game was much more fun to watch. Both teams played out of the back.

Supposedly one of the best games was the 2008 FC Frederick Girls vs. MD Rush. I think it was 3-3, went through over time where Rush won on PKs.


NOT a troll post. MD State Cup website has 2009 PPA Boys winning 6-1 and Girls winning 2-0.


6-1 is pretty embarrassing for a state cup final.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:LOL. Roster poster is crazy and creepy. You want to see the names of a bunch of 11 or 12 year old kids for what purpose?


Jeez, calm down people.
My son plays for one of the programs that made the finals, but on a lower team, and is curious who's on the top team. That's it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U12 boys Bethesda lost to PPA. 6-1.


Troll post. 2009 PPA Boys won 3-1. They also won the 2009 girls, 2-1. Hats off for beating Bethesda in both however.

Watched both games. PPA had a stronger performance in the Boys game. It wasn't dominant but was much much stronger. The PPA girls on the other hand were dominated by Bethesda possession. Just one of those games where the few shots that were had, a couple went in. Both teams should have played out of the back more as they just punted to each often.

Boys game was much more fun to watch. Both teams played out of the back.

Supposedly one of the best games was the 2008 FC Frederick Girls vs. MD Rush. I think it was 3-3, went through over time where Rush won on PKs.


NOT a troll post. MD State Cup website has 2009 PPA Boys winning 6-1 and Girls winning 2-0.


Boys score is correct. Girls score 2-1 and was reported wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:6-1 is pretty embarrassing for a state cup final.


Bethesda 09 is a very good team, but anyone who has seen PPA play recently, this isn't surprising. The margin maybe, but definitely not the W.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:6-1 is pretty embarrassing for a state cup final.


Bethesda 09 is a very good team, but anyone who has seen PPA play recently, this isn't surprising. The margin maybe, but definitely not the W.


It was 1-1 at half-time. Then BSC got schooled. I guess you can call that “playing from the back!” Haa.
post reply Forum Index » Soccer
Message Quick Reply
Go to: