Agree - Barnard is TECHNICALLY NOT PART OF COLUMBIA UNVERSITY, rather it is affiliated through a contractual agreement that allows barnard to describe itself as being under the columbia umbrella and to alow barrnard participation in sports/clubs and some classes. Basically, Columbia undergrad includes the columbia college and columbia engineering admissions/stats combined. This is never the case with barnard. The columbia trustees and administration have no responsibility for barnard, which is separately managed. I think Barnard pays rent to columbia for some facilities, and perhaps that is why Columbia continues to "help" barnard. |
They are not the same. Columbia requires a wide array of classes called the core. You might not want to take those. Barnard also requires breadth, but not quite as rigid about the structure. There is more to picking a school than pretty buildings and rankings. The colleges feel different. |
|
Barnard is part of the university. It is not the flagship Ivy college one thinks of, but very much part of the place. It has a different feel and separate admissions from Columbia college.
Back in the day, most ivies had a men’s college and a women’s college. Newcomb, Radcliffe, Evelyn.... most died away and were subsumed into the men’s college. But not Barnard stayed standing. |
What you mean is that at most universities the women’s college was separate. The men got to go to the main university that we all know, and the women had to go to an affiliated college. Calling it a men’s college makes it sound like it was also something different. It wasn’t. The men got to go to the main university and women had to go elsewhere. |
Thank you. A plus answer for DCUM! |
Vassar is still standing. Yale wanted to combine with its sister college back in the days. Their plan was to send all the women Vassar students to New Haven. Vassar decided to go co-ed without Yale. Yale then had to scramble to go co-ed itself. |
|
It is easier to get into Barnard than Columbia OP.
I had 2 HS friends attend. Their dorms were enormous, apartments where there were sometimes 6 to a room, but a huge room with huge windows etc. It was a very cool place to be in the late 80s/ early 90s. And super safe. |
| So Barnard is prestigious? |
yes |
|
Excellent explanation from the horse’s mouth:
https://www.columbiaspectator.com/required-reading/2017/04/03/decoding-the-tricky-barnard-columbia-relationship/ |
|
Yes, of course it is prestigious.
I went to Columbia College and knew plenty of gifted women who were students at Barnard. They were very bright, indeed; and many went onto medical schools, law schools, doctorates. I read some where that Barnard has the largest number of alumnae who go on to earn doctorates. Columbia College ( from a man's perspective) quite frankly has the best of both worlds : women at Columbia College and women at Barnard. An intellectual and social paradise if/when one has the time from the heavy course load. I guess a case of Adam thanking Eve twice over ! Two Eves are better than one. Barnard provides a great contribution to the Columbia campus alongside its own campus, with all sorts of good things. |
This is gross and offensive |
I went to Barnard and my diploma says Columbia University Board of Trustees. |
Barnard is a draw in its own right aside from the odds of admission. DD preferred Barnard to Columbia because she found the Core overly restrictive. She also liked the fact that resources at Barnard are devoted to empowering and supporting women, right down to the heights of counters in the labs, we were told. |
Sorry. Absolutely no offense was intended. I was simply saying that I had a great time in College and Barnard was a big part of that. Great students, great teachers, nice traditions at Barnard. The meal plan was coed and was a lot of fun, too. Thank you, Barnard. |