|
slac with A STRUCTURED curriculum that will make sure he takes writing intensive courses.
Hamilton is a great school, but I think their curriculum is very unstructured. Franklin & Marshall might be good for your child. |
Being a good LEGAL writer is a must. There are plenty of generically good writers who can't write like lawyers to save their lives. You need to understand the difference. |
The question is can being a good writer helps you to be a good legal writer? |
| SLACs, Ivy, Berkeley, Michigan, Chicago, UVA. |
Yes, obviously. Legal writing is not that hard, IMO. You're quoting a lot of case law and rules to prove your argument. |
| Some colleges have writing requirements for graduation, as in you cannot graduate without earning your writing credential, including requirements for basic writing and writing specific to your major and degree. Your writing portfolio is reviewed by a panel of professors across disciplines in your senior year. If it is rejected, you have remediate it in the summer to get your degree. Look for something like that in the schools your child is interested in attending. |
You're obviously not a lawyer. If you were, you'd know that persuasive legal writing involves much more than that. And, at times, much less than that. |
Lol. I am a lawyer. |
| Denison |
LOL! Law school has turned many a fine writer into a terrible writer. |
I went to a SLAC with an unstructured curriculum and every single class had a heavy/strong writing component. This was purposeful. |
Well, ok, then. How often have you seen a brief and thought "wow, this guy/woman really can't write?" I'll bet you've thought that many, many times. Because I sure have. And if so many lawyers can't write a good legal brief, then by definition it's not easy. |
the only undergraduate class that really helped me in this regard was symbolic logic because it made me thing about the structure of arguments. Law schools have writing classes and legal writing really doesn't have too much in common with writing for a history or philosophy class. I think if you wrote a history paper in the same format as a legal memo you'd probably get an F |
I don't disagree. But you've proven my point that being a good writer doesn't necessarily translate into being a good legal writer. Two different skill sets. |
my first thought is usually a dozen people probably wrote and edited this thing and then some poor sap had to merge it together hours before filing |