She is going to face significant capital gains no matter what because of when she and her husband purchased the house. Honestly an additional $250k in gains may not make that much difference. |
Oops. Brain fart. *capital gains exclusion |
| If she has dementia, who has legal authority/capacity to make the sale? Did she give her son Power of Attorney before she developed dementia? |
| I wouldn't leave it empty too long. Wasn't it that area where Bethesda teens found the empty house and started using it for parties? Several years back, I think the owners were posted overseas. |
|
Thanks PPs. She’s 88, has just the one son, and her husband died about four years ago. She did sign a POA years ago, but it needs to be updated as her son was primary and her late husband was secondary. So if anything happens to her son, there’s no longer a back up, and closest living relative after her son is NOT a trustworthy individual (think theft and fraud).
For now, she has not been formally declared incapacitated, but she really does not have the capacity to make reasonable judgments about her care or financial decisions. She and her husband bought the house close to 50 years ago, so yes, there’d be a lot of gain. If her husband died 4yrs ago would she also get “credit” for the step-up of his half the property? If so, that would help a lot, but there would still be a pretty meaningful gain. |
| Sell. And then do as much paperwork as possible (closing down old accounts) before she is formally declared incapacitated. DH sits with his mother who also has mild dementia, makes the calls and then hands the phone over to her so that the agent can confirm her intentions. |
It isn’t a “loophole” at all, pp. It is deliberate and sensible tax policy. I don’t know why you think it is “unfair.” It is available to everyone — it isn’t some special tax break like carried interest (which is more like a loophole since it isn’t really intended tax policy). Stepped up basis is also much easier to administer. Carryover basis in real estate would be ridiculously burdensome. |
4 years ago? Definitely consult an attorney (to get an accurate answer on how exactly when she would need to claim the exemption by) and get going if you even think she will sell. Every house needs fixes to be in its best shape before going on the market. You also need to talk to some realtors to get their ideas on what needs to be done and what you should ignore and let the buyer deal with. How were she and her husband holding the property? Was it only in his name (pretty common even in the 60s and 70s) and then transferred to her upon his death? FWIW I would probably hold onto it and keep renting it out for the monthly rental income but that's me. If you think you want to sell then you need to get your rear in gear to get it done before the ability to use the husband's exclusion would run out. |
Yes — you lose the capital gains exclusion, but it doesn’t matter, because you get a stepped up basis upon inheritance. |
|
As other people have mentioned, do not have her gift the house to the son. Horrible idea from a tax perspective.
Keep the house, rent it out. It will be a pain in the butt, but it will provide her with a steady income. Dementia care is VERY expensive. And what they don't tell you is that it gets even more expensive as time goes on and the dementia gets worse. Also, primary homes are not included when determining eligibility for financial help for care. But everything else is. Say the house is worth 500K. If she sells it for 500K and then has 500K in investments, those investments count towards determining whether she is eligible for $ from the government for her care (she would not be). If she keeps the house, only the monthly rent (less expenses) would be used to determine if she was eligible. If she has enough money in savings/investments, this doesn't really matter. But as I said before, dementia care is expensive, she could go through that other money fast. |