Why delete the post about Facebook/Twitter censorship of Washington Post article?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting word choice - "hoax." Many things that are called hoaxes turn out not to be, don't they?

I think if you review my posts you will find that when I have called things hoaxes, I have been fairly accurate. In contrast, Republican investigations into Benghazi turned up nada. Barr has launched one investigation after another which conservatives have hyped in our Political Forum. They have turned up nada. One might say that Republican-led investigations are almost universally hoaxes.

The investigation by Durham has not been finished so I'm not sure how you can say it has turned up nothing.

If it turned up anything it would have been released (either officially or through leaks). It won't do Barr any good after the election. Just like the unmaking investigation which turned up nada.

[Anonymous]

Analysis from a security researcher I follow (his conclusions are consistent with Jeff’s) -

https://krypt3ia.wordpress.com/2020/10/14/the-biden-october-surprise-is-here/

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting word choice - "hoax." Many things that are called hoaxes turn out not to be, don't they?

I think if you review my posts you will find that when I have called things hoaxes, I have been fairly accurate. In contrast, Republican investigations into Benghazi turned up nada. Barr has launched one investigation after another which conservatives have hyped in our Political Forum. They have turned up nada. One might say that Republican-led investigations are almost universally hoaxes.

The investigation by Durham has not been finished so I'm not sure how you can say it has turned up nothing.

If it turned up anything it would have been released (either officially or through leaks). It won't do Barr any good after the election. Just like the unmaking investigation which turned up nada.

You shouldn't be expecting findings to be officially released prior to its completion, of course. The unmasking work that was being done by Bash has been taken over by Gregg Sofer.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/06/acting-us-attorney-gregg-sofer-to-pick-up-unmasking-probe-report/

There has been no word from any named DOJ source saying it's over, but hey, there's your anonymous leak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting word choice - "hoax." Many things that are called hoaxes turn out not to be, don't they?

I think if you review my posts you will find that when I have called things hoaxes, I have been fairly accurate. In contrast, Republican investigations into Benghazi turned up nada. Barr has launched one investigation after another which conservatives have hyped in our Political Forum. They have turned up nada. One might say that Republican-led investigations are almost universally hoaxes.

The investigation by Durham has not been finished so I'm not sure how you can say it has turned up nothing.

If it turned up anything it would have been released (either officially or through leaks). It won't do Barr any good after the election. Just like the unmaking investigation which turned up nada.

You shouldn't be expecting findings to be officially released prior to its completion, of course. The unmasking work that was being done by Bash has been taken over by Gregg Sofer.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/06/acting-us-attorney-gregg-sofer-to-pick-up-unmasking-probe-report/

There has been no word from any named DOJ source saying it's over, but hey, there's your anonymous leak.

I am sure Gregg Sofer will give all the information of the case to.... Rudy Giuliani. Just like the unnamed computer repair guy did...lol

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I am sure Gregg Sofer will give all the information of the case to.... Rudy Giuliani. Just like the unnamed computer repair guy did...lol

The computer repair guy has been named. He is a crazy Trumpster who believes in the Seth Rich conspiracy theory.

[jsteele]

Related to this discussion:

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What makes it so obvious?

The store owner doesn't know who dropped off the laptop. For some reason he appears to have searched the data -- something no ethical person would have done. The owner made a copy of the drive and gave it to Rudy Giuliani's lawyer. Guiliani and Bannon provided it to the Post. Giuliani has been working with known Russian agents and has been engaged in disinformation activities. The "smoking gun" emails were not actually emails, but PDF's of the emails that were created over a year ago. Giuliani has also had the hard drive for nearly a year, meaning that he sat on in throughout the impeachment process and everything else.

No forensics were done by the Post and the fact that the "emails" were PDFs means that there weren't even email headers to investigate. The author of the article is a former Hannity employee and this was her first article in the Post. Also, the "smoking gun" email doesn't even say what the Post claims it says and it is, in fact, not incriminating.

There is a lot more, but it was obvious to me from my first read of the article that the entire thing was hogwash (I didn't notice all of this stuff -- some of which others pointed out -- during my first read but I noticed a lot). My first suspicion was that the laptop was stolen from Hunter and laundered through the store. Now I think the entire thing was created from whole cloth.

Ding! Ding! Ding!

[Anonymous]

Post is going to get sued for libel over this. It's actual malice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting word choice - "hoax." Many things that are called hoaxes turn out not to be, don't they?

Like the Pandemic?
Like Hydroqloquine?
Like Trumps' daily lies?
Like the Virus is gone?

Shall I continue.... TRUMP and his CRONIES LIE DAILY.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was the post about the NY Post article regarding Hunter Biden deleted?

It is an obvious hoax. DCUM is not going to be used as a platform for spreading obvious misinformation.

There are photos of Hunter Biden doing drugs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was the post about the NY Post article regarding Hunter Biden deleted?

It is an obvious hoax. DCUM is not going to be used as a platform for spreading obvious misinformation.

There are photos of Hunter Biden doing drugs.

So?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting word choice - "hoax." Many things that are called hoaxes turn out not to be, don't they?

Like the Pandemic?
Like Hydroqloquine?
Like Trumps' daily lies?
Like the Virus is gone?

Shall I continue.... TRUMP and his CRONIES LIE DAILY.

Every. Fcking. Day.