Will COVID at school of ACB’s kids prevent appointment to court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

Ugh, please. The kids should have been kept at home for 14 days from the day of exposure - 14 days is today. A negative test is not the standard because all that tells you is that you don't have any or enough viral load at the time of the test. The POSITIVE test, especially after symptoms is how you do contract tracing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I am NO fan of ACB, but some of you people are off your rockers. Wow.

+100. There is no way to tie this to her.

This is not about being a fan or not. It's about proper public health protocols and the willingness of our governmental officials to adhere to them. We don't know if it's tied to her or not. That is what contract tracing and quarantine/isolation would do to help stop the spread.

My husband was exposed to a person that tested positive - this was back in March. He isolated for 14 days per CDC guidelines.

Obviously the WH is completely thumbing its nose at most protocols, but that doesn't mean every other branch of government has to go along.

Exactly. I’m the “no fan” PP. I in no way think she should be on the SC (or any court). But I don’t think a couple of coronavirus cases at a school, or even the Rose Garden nightmare, could be used to derail her.

In my opinion she should be derailed for many other reasons. Coronavirus is a stretch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

You believe a "senior White House official"? I don't. When have they been honest ONCE about this Covid outbreak? They won't even say the last time Trump was negative.

A senior White House official said the Barretts kept their children home from school as soon as they learned that some attendees of the White House event had tested positive. The children have not experienced symptoms of infection, and they tested negative for the virus before they returned to the classroom, the official said.

I do believe the parents at the school, though, who seems to know where the infection came from.

Parents expressed concern that the outbreak might have been tied to the Rose Garden event. One parent, who asked not to be identified, said at least one of the Barrett children attended classes in person the following week, even though the school offers an online learning option.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I am NO fan of ACB, but some of you people are off your rockers. Wow.

+100. There is no way to tie this to her.

Ummm, her name is Amy COVID Barrett.

[Anonymous]

I thought they already had it?

https://www.businessinsider.com/amy-coney-barrett-tested-positive-for-coronavirus-this-summer-reports-2020-10



I hate the fact that I'm so cynical about the current state of affairs, but *technically* she could have "had it" (a.k.a. "tested positive") (a.k.a. "already past it") less than a week before the Rose Garden Event.

The statement "she had it this past summer" could still be true while not being even close to what actually happened.

Last Day of Summer: Sept 21

Rose Garden Event: Sept. 26

Covid at the school: Oct 9




I seriously want this election over and done with so I can stop considering tinfoil hats. I ALSO really don't like that "contract tracing" is now a negative thing.

[Anonymous]

Makes you wonder if White House decided not to do contact tracing to avoid ACB quarantining and slowing down confirmation hearings.

[Anonymous]

Where's the proof her kids tested negative and when were they tested? There is NO WAY the cases at the school are unrelated to the rose garden. She was reckless to take her kids unmasked around all those unmasked people, travel with her whole family, and then send them in to school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

No. You are wrong.

Read.

You can see I did not say her kids tested positive, Trumper.

I think the problem is you do not read well.

Are you one of the teenagers Turning Point pays to troll the internet?

OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

Ugh, please. The kids should have been kept at home for 14 days from the day of exposure - 14 days is today. A negative test is not the standard because all that tells you is that you don't have any or enough viral load at the time of the test. The POSITIVE test, especially after symptoms is how you do contract tracing.

Look at the photos. Her kids spoke to many COVId-positive people and sat tightly packed next to COVId positive people like Melania, Kellyanne, Tilles and Trump. I know you do not like facts but thems are the facts.

[Anonymous]

I think for the safety of the Senate judiciary committee, she needs to have the PCR test. Obviously the antibody test will not help since it is already known that she had the virus over the summer, so she definitely has the antibodies. But they need to make sure that she does not have active cells before she meets in person with the judiciary committee.

Of 22 members on the judiciary committee, 3 are in their 80's, 3 are in their 70's, 8 are in the 60's (3 of which are 68, 68 and 69). That means 14/22 members are 60's-80's (9/22 are 68+). They are very vulnerable ages. before you expose these judiciary committee members to someone who is one of the potential super-spreaders, she needs to be adequately tested.

In addition, they should be setting up precautions, a large plexiglass screen like Jaime Harrison used in the recent debates and box fans to circulate the air away from the Senators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

Ugh, please. The kids should have been kept at home for 14 days from the day of exposure - 14 days is today. A negative test is not the standard because all that tells you is that you don't have any or enough viral load at the time of the test. The POSITIVE test, especially after symptoms is how you do contract tracing.

Look at the photos. Her kids spoke to many COVId-positive people and sat tightly packed next to COVId positive people like Melania, Kellyanne, Tilles and Trump. I know you do not like facts but thems are the facts.

All the indoor photos have the kids right up close to Trump, senators, Melania, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think for the safety of the Senate judiciary committee, she needs to have the PCR test. Obviously the antibody test will not help since it is already known that she had the virus over the summer, so she definitely has the antibodies. But they need to make sure that she does not have active cells before she meets in person with the judiciary committee.

Of 22 members on the judiciary committee, 3 are in their 80's, 3 are in their 70's, 8 are in the 60's (3 of which are 68, 68 and 69). That means 14/22 members are 60's-80's (9/22 are 68+). They are very vulnerable ages. before you expose these judiciary committee members to someone who is one of the potential super-spreaders, she needs to be adequately tested.

In addition, they should be setting up precautions, a large plexiglass screen like Jaime Harrison used in the recent debates and box fans to circulate the air away from the Senators.

Every Senator should be required to test negative before showing up in person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

Ugh, please. The kids should have been kept at home for 14 days from the day of exposure - 14 days is today. A negative test is not the standard because all that tells you is that you don't have any or enough viral load at the time of the test. The POSITIVE test, especially after symptoms is how you do contract tracing.

Look at the photos. Her kids spoke to many COVId-positive people and sat tightly packed next to COVId positive people like Melania, Kellyanne, Tilles and Trump. I know you do not like facts but thems are the facts.

Say it again for the dumbasses in the back.

Donald Trump, President with Daughter 1
Chris Christie, Debate Partner with Son 1


William Barr, Attornel General with Son 1
Alex Azar, HHS Secretary with Son 1


Thom Tillis, Senator / Judiciary Committee with Son 1

[Anonymous]

What a vile swamp these people swim in, full of Covidians.

Please, everyone VOTE for Biden!! End this national nightmare!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did her children test positive?

Read the article. Her kids tested negative. Way to go on spreading malicious rumors about kids, op. Well done.

Ugh, please. The kids should have been kept at home for 14 days from the day of exposure - 14 days is today. A negative test is not the standard because all that tells you is that you don't have any or enough viral load at the time of the test. The POSITIVE test, especially after symptoms is how you do contract tracing.

Look at the photos. Her kids spoke to many COVId-positive people and sat tightly packed next to COVId positive people like Melania, Kellyanne, Tilles and Trump. I know you do not like facts but thems are the facts.

All the indoor photos have the kids right up close to Trump, senators, Melania, etc.

They were willing to risk transmission for the sake of glurgy cute photo ops with kids.

Either they don't believe in science, or they rate opics higher than human life. I cannot believe people who identify as pro-life are not bothered by that.