Hogan Administration Official Praises Teen Kenosha Shooter on Social Media, Loses Job

[Anonymous]

I can predict the end of Kenosha Shooter in the next 5 years. He will be another Zimmerman but this time someone will probably take him out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He deserves an angry crowd of protesters outside his home tonight. Don’t be a turd of you can’t handle a herd.

This.

Bullshit. Showing up at peoples houses to bully them in person for speech is a fascist tactic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

He did not use an automatic weapon. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. He did not have a machine gun.

An AR16 IS a machine gun, dumbass. Same gun the army uses. You can watch the video and hear him firing multiple shots with it.

Did you even see the video, idiot?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can predict the end of Kenosha Shooter in the next 5 years. He will be another Zimmerman but this time someone will probably take him out.

Yep. Hopefully they also take out his parents, too. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, and if they’re still around, they’ll see to it the little nazi becomes a martyr.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

He did not use an automatic weapon. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. He did not have a machine gun.

An AR16 IS a machine gun, dumbass. Same gun the army uses. You can watch the video and hear him firing multiple shots with it.

Did you even see the video, idiot?

100% wrong.

[Anonymous]

In his press conference, he tearfully said all he wanted was his old life back. Pretty ironic, considering he showed support for someone who committed murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

He did not use an automatic weapon. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. He did not have a machine gun.

An AR16 IS a machine gun, dumbass. Same gun the army uses. You can watch the video and hear him firing multiple shots with it.

Did you even see the video, idiot?

100% wrong.

100% don’t care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

He did not use an automatic weapon. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. He did not have a machine gun.

An AR16 IS a machine gun, dumbass. Same gun the army uses. You can watch the video and hear him firing multiple shots with it.

Did you even see the video, idiot?

What's an AR16?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

He did not use an automatic weapon. An automatic weapon is a machine gun. He did not have a machine gun.

He still committed several felonies. Even if he is innocent of the homicide charge, he stlll will have to deal with the following.
Illegal use of a firearm. Both IL and WI law says you need to be 18 to use a firearm. In IL you need to be 21 to own a gun.
Illegal transportation of a weapon across state lines for a illegal purpose, e.g. for a minor to use.

He is guilty of a misdemeanor of violating curfew. He was actually warned by a passing officer and told to evacuate the area and he did not.

He is being tried as an adult, so those felonies will be charged, prosecuted and if found guilty (not sure how he can be innocent of those) and sentenced for those. There will be even more civil unrest if he does not do some prison time.

Sounds like felony murder. Felony murder is a legal rule that expands the definition of murder to anyone involved in a certain felonies and someone else dies in the course of it. It doesn't matter whether the death was intentional or accidental—the defendant is liable for it. In death penalty states, people who weren't even the shooter have been put to death under the felony murder rule.

What a world we live in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

You think the guy roaming the street with a gun, who killed two people with it, didn't bring the gun to shoot people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

He committed other felonies besides the curfew issue and yes the law states you can’t declare self defense while committing a crime.

You think somebody that breaks into your house, you attack them... they can kill you and declare self defense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

He committed other felonies besides the curfew issue and yes the law states you can’t declare self defense while committing a crime.

You think somebody that breaks into your house, you attack them... they can kill you and declare self defense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

He committed other felonies besides the curfew issue and yes the law states you can’t declare self defense while committing a crime.

You think somebody that breaks into your house, you attack them... they can kill you and declare self defense?

No one broke into anyone's home. The streets belong to the public. Violating curfew isn't a felony. I'm either arguing with a retard (also, see inability to master simple formatting) or a 12 year old. If I'm carrying a rifle down King Street tonight and some idiot attacks me with blunt instrument and I shoot and kill him I have committed no crime. Same with Kyle. He was only charged to appease the masses while all this percolates. No way does he see time.