I was 0 to 3 with triplets. No transition was hard after that. |
Once you get to 3, anything passed that is easy. So, 1 to 2 is always the biggest change. |
2 to 3 was very very hard for me |
Wow! You’ve got me beat. |
For me, 0 to 1 was the hardest.
For DH it was 1 to 2. We now have 3, and 2 to 3 was by far the easiest for both of us. That said, we're also done at 3. |
I’m the PP, and yeah, pretty much this. The dynamics frequently shift with three, the laundry is a lot more, the schedule coordinating gets to be a lot, etc.—and our kids weren’t even in a lot of activities BC. The hardest part is the dynamics, IME. With two kids, you have their dynamic. More than that, and it’s the multiple, often shifting ones that becomes really challenging. My kids are all talkers, too, so that’s a lot of voices wanting to be heard. |
0 to 1. |
I think 1 to 2 was harder for my husband too, probably because he had to really step up with two! |
0-1. Our marriage, my identity, loss of our community, being far from family. It was so so hard.
Once we were in the routine of having kids, adding more wasn’t an issue. 2-3 was the easiest actually. |
I totally agree with this BUT I spend a lot of time with my kids in the summer by myself. So going from 1 to 2 felt difficult but going from 2 to 3 wasn't such a big deal because I was already outnumbered. However, actually having 3 kids seems like mathematically much more work than 2--it doesn't feel like 3 times the laundry, it feels like 10 times the laundry, 10 times louder, 10 times more coordination of pick up/drop off/doctors appointments, etc. But I wouldn't trade it for anything, my third balances out my older two and is the sweetest and still gives me cuddles!! |
I think this is very dependent on your age gap. My kids are 10, 8 and nearly 4 and 1 to 2 was my harshest transition (2 year age gap). The 4.5 year age gap and settled childcare situation made 2 to 3 a breeze. |
Agree with all of this, but especially 10 times the laundry. Oh, the laundry! |
Yes! I think when it got to be more than one load s day, it just felt unmanageable. |
+1 |
PP you're quoting, and yes I agree with you that I wouldn't trade it for anything. I do think that the issue around being outnumbered and solo parenting 2 vs. 3 is part of it. Taking three kids out on your own--or even just having them at home on your own--is such a different ballgame than with two kids. I'm pretty capable of doing it, but it was a learning curve. Whenever I hear parents who feel overwhelmed with two say they're considering a third, I want to scream. If you're already overwhelmed, DON'T have another kid. |